Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-27-2017, 05:11 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
I'd like Trump to ban Muslims from all countries and expel all the Muslims living here.

But he's made a good start.

Gee, couldn't we just intern them as with the Japanese? Or perhaps just make them have a yellow star and crescent sewn on their clothing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-27-2017, 05:13 AM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,220,557 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Gee, couldn't we just intern them as with the Japanese? Or perhaps just make them have a yellow star and crescent sewn on their clothing?
Nah, just round them up and deport them.

What you are suggesting is so 1940's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2017, 05:43 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,435,569 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Gee, couldn't we just intern them as with the Japanese? Or perhaps just make them have a yellow star and crescent sewn on their clothing?
Sure, whatever.

My preference, though, is that they simply be removed from the country.

There's no reason to have them here, and a boatload of reasons not to have them here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2017, 05:45 AM
 
Location: Southern Nevada
6,751 posts, read 3,367,193 times
Reputation: 10369
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper 88 View Post
It's not a Muslim ban


</thread fail>
Exactly. It's a 120 day moratorium so they can sort things out and get a better vetting process in place. It is not a "ban" on Muslims, although it should be. Islam is not compatible with our Western culture. You only need to look as far as France and Germany to see what the Muslims are doing over there.

Germany is having its regrets with allowing so many refugees into their county and now wants to deport 100,000 of them. There is something to be learned from that. It would be more prudent to be safe than sorry, but the liberals in this country don't see the reasoning in that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2017, 05:46 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,435,569 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaro5 View Post
Exactly. It's a 120 day moratorium so they can sort things out and get a better vetting process in place. It is not a "ban" on Muslims, although it should be. Islam is not compatible with our Western culture. You only need to look as far as France and Germany to see what the Muslims are doing over there.

Germany is having its regrets with allowing so many refugees into their county and now wants to deport 100,000 of them. There is something to be learned from that. It would be more prudent to be safe than sorry, but the liberals in this country don't see the reasoning in that.
Liberals support anything that they perceive as a threat to America -- particularly white, Christian, law-abiding America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2017, 05:49 AM
 
21,472 posts, read 10,572,809 times
Reputation: 14121
Quote:
Originally Posted by botticelli View Post
and no Saudi Arabia because?
Because Saudi Arabia has an effective government and security apparatus. We can properly vett people coming from there because their government keeps records. The countries he chose have no effective government at all right now, no where to check records to properly vett refugees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2017, 05:52 AM
 
21,472 posts, read 10,572,809 times
Reputation: 14121
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
Sure, whatever.

My preference, though, is that they simply be removed from the country.

There's no reason to have them here, and a boatload of reasons not to have them here.
Why? There are plenty of US citizens here who are Muslim. They have every right of a US citizen. If they commit a crime, they go to jail. Otherwise, they are free.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2017, 05:56 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,435,569 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by katygirl68 View Post
Why? There are plenty of US citizens here who are Muslim. They have every right of a US citizen. If they commit a crime, they go to jail. Otherwise, they are free.
Their religion is poison. It is anti-other religions, anti-democratic, anti-personal freedom, anti-women's rights, etc. It does not fit into a free, democratic society that respects human rights and liberties. It follows that we cannot and must not have committed Muslims in our midst. Serious Muslims divide the world into two "houses" -- the house of Islam, and the house of Jihad. In the house of Jihad, non-Muslims are made to submit ("Islam" means "submission") to Muslim domination. Which means you either become a Muslim, pay a tax for being an infidel, or die by the sword.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2017, 07:05 AM
 
21,472 posts, read 10,572,809 times
Reputation: 14121
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
Their religion is poison. It is anti-other religions, anti-democratic, anti-personal freedom, anti-women's rights, etc. It does not fit into a free, democratic society that respects human rights and liberties. It follows that we cannot and must not have committed Muslims in our midst. Serious Muslims divide the world into two "houses" -- the house of Islam, and the house of Jihad. In the house of Jihad, non-Muslims are made to submit ("Islam" means "submission") to Muslim domination. Which means you either become a Muslim, pay a tax for being an infidel, or die by the sword.
I know plenty of Muslims that are not like that at all. Especially those growing up here. They will eventually moderate as our Pilgrims did. But going completely against the Constitution is not going to help that happen. What you propose is just not right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2017, 08:09 AM
 
Location: USA
7,474 posts, read 7,033,677 times
Reputation: 12513
First they came for the Muslims, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Muslim.

Then they came for the gays, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not gay.

Then they came for the poor, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not poor.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top