Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Please....liberals get in touch with reality.... This is not a ban on immigration -- it's a 90 pause of a few terrorist-prone countries until we get can our security vetting in order.
Our intelligence and Homeland Security has repeatedly told us they can't vet these people properly, and ISIS has repeatedly and openly stated they plan on infiltrating their terrorists into the refugees. Stop with the stupid politicizing of our national security, and GET REAL!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25
And...
We are already doing that via vetting.
Why is that not good enough?
Here is the vetting procedure that was in place prior to President Trump taking office:
Looks nice on paper -- but both our intelligence agencies and HLS have stated repeatedly we can't adequately vet these people, and ISIS has repeatedly and openly stated they are infiltrating the refugees.
Thank you for posting that. I've seen and read that link many times. I'm comfortable with our vetting process. I don't believe it needs to be changed. I do, however, think more money needs to be invested into expanding ICE so we can enforce the rules we already have on the books.
Looks nice on paper -- but both our intelligence agencies and HLS have stated repeatedly we can't adequately vet these people, and ISIS has repeatedly and openly stated they are infiltrating the refugees.
This is who you guys voted and elected , Trump has been saying he will BAN all Muslims and make america white again.
The bolded is a lie. The fact is that immigration for people from certain countries is temporarily suspended. Liberals should attempt to calm down and see how the new process will work before getting into a hysterical, racist rant. Legal permanent residents will be allowed in after carefully reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This is what any country in the world is permitted to do. Why not the U.S.?
Another example of a drive-by post from a liberal-fascist group trying to portray conservatives and independents as racists. This kind of spin keeps many people convinced that most liberals have become too extreme and deceitful to be trusted.
It seems that what upsets liberals the most is that there's now a president who is doing exactly what he said he would do. The audacity of it all--not political posturing, but decisive action. It upsets the delicate flowers like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.
The bolded is a lie. The fact is that immigration for people from certain countries is temporarily suspended. Liberals should attempt to calm down and see how the new process will work before getting into a hysterical, racist rant. Legal permanent residents will be allowed in after carefully reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This is what any country in the world is permitted to do. Why not the U.S.?
Another example of a drive-by post from a liberal-fascist group trying to portray conservatives and independents as racists. This kind of spin keeps many people convinced that most liberals have become too extreme and deceitful to be trusted.
It seems that what upsets liberals the most is that there's now a president who is doing exactly what he said he would do. The audacity of it all--not political posturing, but decisive action. It upsets the delicate flowers like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.
Didn't you guys spent the last year saying not to take him literally? That's your narrative, I didn't vote for the guy in the off chance that our institutions would allow him to do what he said he would. Now here we are, can we expect the eventual total ban of Muslims like he said, or the carpet bombing of middle east like he said, the persecutiong of families of terrorist like he said, or we shouldn't we should pick and choose what he meant because then he is a politician, so your guy is not so special. Either intellectually you can't wrap your head around what's happening or you are who we (progressives) think you are, I think the latter.
FYI that's not a great answer to a question that required substance. LOTS of people say its not good enough. I want to know WHY its not.
The CIA director, FBI director and Director of National Intelligence -- all working under Obama -- said that our vetting wasn't good enough.
If you want to know why they said that, ask them.
They obviously wouldn't have said it if they didn't have good reasons.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DUNNDFRNT
Didn't you guys spent the last year saying not to take him literally? That's your narrative, I didn't vote for the guy in the off chance that our institutions would allow him to do what he said he would. Now here we are, can we expect the eventual total ban of Muslims like he said
I see nothing wrong with that. There is no reason for us to have any Muslims in this country, and a lot of reasons not to have them.
Quote:
or the carpet bombing of middle east like he said
Nothing wrong with exterminating the Jihadists. We should have done that a long time ago.
Quote:
the persecutiong of families of terrorist like he said
Can't see anything wrong with that, either, if they're terrorist sympathizers.
You conservative radicals are something else. We have herr Fuhrer for 4 years. You guys complained every bit as much as we are because you couldn't believe YOU had a black President. He at least wasted almost 2 years trying to work with your people. They even said they wanted him to "fail". Good Americans with their Tea Party get ups and signs of Obama likenesses on the end of a rope. Yes, we have been here before. Obstruction is not new. Just look at the past 8 years....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.