Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Canada is already taking refugees. We're presently talking about a nation refusing them after agreeing to take them..... er.....aren't we?
Yet another moron who characterizes Australia as a "friend" while consigning Canada to some other category.
Oh, and one more thing; in spite of your inflated opinion of yourselves, the U.S. does not get to unilaterally decide to "send" anyone to another sovereign nation.
either way I'm sure Trudeau will love to take them
They are trying to dump their problems on us. They don't care who they unload on. Trump was just not going to let them screw us. Terrorist are not welcome.
Thank God TRump is always there to save the day!!
My brother and his wife used to live in Oklahoma, Tornado Alley. There was an outbreak of deadly tornadoes and one was headed for them in Tulsa-they could see it barrelling down on them. All of a sudden Donald TRump pulls up in his limo, gets out, approaches the funnel, raises his hand and yells "You shall not pass-you're fired"!! Suddenly the tornado vanished, and the storm gave way to clear, blue skies, and calm!
Why are you completely IGNORING facts?? You are TRADING people who YOU are holding in detention centers in Costa Rica. They are not dumping ANYONE on you.
You want a paperbag to hyperventilate in or something?
the people we are trading are very different from those refugees from terrorist prone countries, that is why Australia is OK with them and Obama is dumb enough to support it.
Did you just call Australians traitors?? They've been fighting by your side in nearly every boondoggle of a war you guys have dreamt up since the end of the second world war. Get your head out of your ass. They owe you nothing.
Well why didn't Australia just say "no"?
Why pretend that Australia didn't have a vested interest as opposed to just being sheep?
Quote:
...It is not fair to simply write off the decision as Australia blindly following American policy. It is important to remember that for most of the period before full-scale war erupted in Vietnam, it was Australia who was pushing America into further involvement in the region. SEATO was eventually used by the Americans to justify their presence in Vietnam, but it was the Australians who actually tried to invoke SEATO first. In 1962 when they wanted to stop Indonesian aggression in western New Guinea, they asked America to become involved, but the US had diplomatic commitments with Indonesia as well as Australia and said no.
Quote:
The entry of Australia into the Vietnam conflict was the culmination of over 15 years of domestic and foreign policy for successive Australian governments. That can be seen domestically in the attempted banning of the communist party and the anti-communist propaganda that Australians had been subjected to for years. As for foreign policy, Australia had already demonstrated its eagerness to stop the spread of 'monolithic' communism by going to war in Korea.
I think all Islamic refugees should be resettled in the states of Democrat governors with 2 Democrat Senators preferably in the districts of the Democrat Representatives. I would especially try to place them in the towns where the Democrat singers of This Land Is Your Land, live. That's what they want, right?
why are they forcing their criminals (whom they don't want) onto us, their ally. They know they are threats but would rather put innocent Americans at risk of another truck attack or Boston bomber. A little girl died in that attack and the Australians know the threat involved.
They should consider the lives of innocent Americans before they try to use America as a garbage bin.
You didn't even bother to read the bit about the deal made to TRADE refugees did you?
Secondly; you've arbitrarily consigned them to criminal status when they are no different to the ones you were holding in detention camps in Costa Rica and agreed to trade off.
How do you do this automatic linear jump from refugees to terrorists without any facts to support it?
Australia would not "force" violent offenders upon you and your quantum leap assuming such is just more insanity from your kind.
Take a deep breath and calm down, lest people observe your frightened little snowflake routine and confuse you for a ........"liberal".
They want to send criminals to our shores without payment, what gives. I thought we were friends, guess they want to screw us over like every other country
Don't be an idiot..... maybe you could rad at least part of the many threads on this topic to see the nuances of this agreement. You need to look up "nuance"?
Obviously Australia doesn't want refugees either they have never been on the same page with the EU and Obama.
You don't know much, do you...I have a solution for you...Stop believing alt right alternate facts....
Australia agreed this week to take an additional 12,000 refugees affected by the Syrian conflict. This almost doubles the intake, from 13,750 to 25,750.
the people we are trading are very different from those refugees from terrorist prone countries, that is why Australia is OK with them and Obama is dumb enough to support it.
Nonsense; complete and utter nonsense! More fear induced paranoia.
C'mon now, Land of the Free and Home of the BRAVE....remember? Say it after me, you can do it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
