Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Will There Be A War With Iran?
Yes. All-out war with Iran in next two years, including ground troops. 10 21.74%
Yes. War with Iran, heavy airstrikes only, no invasion. 4 8.70%
Partial war. Limited airstrikes against a few chosen targets. 5 10.87%
No war. US will put sanctions back on, no hostilities. 18 39.13%
No war. Nothing changes, just more tough talk and bluster. 9 19.57%
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-04-2017, 01:02 PM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,437,203 times
Reputation: 24980

Advertisements

No reason for war, sanctions or any other meddling with Iran.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacktravern View Post
Hopefully. Ready to turn that part of the world into a parking lot and start over. They are in incorrigible.
God, is that you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-04-2017, 01:06 PM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,138,783 times
Reputation: 13661
It'd be an extremely dumb idea.

Iran is 5x larger in geographic mass than Iraq, with much more variable mountainous terrain that would conceal Iranian insurgents more easily (as opposed to flat deserts in Iraq).

Iranians are much more united as a populace than Iraq. Iran is mostly all Shia Muslim, whereas Iraq is much more fragmented (Sunni, Kurds, etc).

Nobody thought the US would ever lose against Vietnam -- a tiny "backwards" jungle country. But they did. Even with the draft.

Instigating a war with Iran would likely slaughter our sons and daughters. It's not like there's not enough trouble with the declining population of native born Americans.

That said, I am morally and religiously opposed to war altogether, but even for a hawk, this would be a very dangerous idea.

I'd rather we just focus on building the wall and screening who's allowed into the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2017, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Secure, Undisclosed
1,984 posts, read 1,700,367 times
Reputation: 3728
Just spent the better part of a year studying how the Iranian theocracy has practiced foreign and military policies since 1979.

Oh WanderLust (above) is dead on about land size. Iran is too large to invade. Wipe that idea right off the table.

But we're thinking backwards. Rather, consider whether Iran will start a war with us.

Most likely if they do it directly - the military force they will use will be the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The location will be the Straits of Hormuz and the target will be US shipping (civil or naval). They started the 1988 tanker war that way, have rebuilt their strike teams in the area of Qarg Island very recently, and that's where they recently grabbed two US patrol boats. Because they clearly came out on top in that encounter (and used it very publicly for domestic propaganda purposes), their confidence in such an attack should currently be high.

Most likely if they do it indirectly - the proxy force they will use will be the Houthi rebels out of Yemen as a proxy attack force, who are guided by Iran's al-Quds force (the external division of the IRGC). There is a very strong suspicion in the intel world that when the Houthis blew up a Saudi carrier last week with three suicide boats, they thought they were hitting a US Naval vessel.

Now, the question is, what will the US do in retaliation after one of the two events above occur...?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2017, 01:24 PM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,473,841 times
Reputation: 12187
If GOP wants to give up all 1,000 seats gained during Obama's 8 years starting needless wars is the answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2017, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Cape Cod
24,490 posts, read 17,226,594 times
Reputation: 35783
It is scary what Iran is doing with their nuclear program and test launches of ballistic missiles. Everyone in the ME is a potential target.

Is Iran like North Korea in that they need to get noticed now and again or are they much more of a real threat? Imagine them teaming up.

Iran never was and never will be our friend. I don't know why Obama was so keen on trying to buy their friendship.

Trump should back away from the ME and get to work on America first.
Iran will never change. We could drop them or go to war and in the end nothing would have changed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2017, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,621,806 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Will There Be a War with Iran?
I am afraid Trump admin will insist on a war to distract people from the chaos they are creating at home and abroad. Also, Trump has said he likes the idea of stealing oil.

Last edited by Finn_Jarber; 02-04-2017 at 01:58 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2017, 01:54 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacktravern View Post
Hopefully. Ready to turn that part of the world into a parking lot and start over. They are in incorrigible.
And NO threat to the US, let 'em all kill each other if they can't learn to live together, NOT our problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2017, 01:57 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rescue3 View Post
Just spent the better part of a year studying how the Iranian theocracy has practiced foreign and military policies since 1979.

Oh WanderLust (above) is dead on about land size. Iran is too large to invade. Wipe that idea right off the table.

But we're thinking backwards. Rather, consider whether Iran will start a war with us.

Most likely if they do it directly - the military force they will use will be the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The location will be the Straits of Hormuz and the target will be US shipping (civil or naval). They started the 1988 tanker war that way, have rebuilt their strike teams in the area of Qarg Island very recently, and that's where they recently grabbed two US patrol boats. Because they clearly came out on top in that encounter (and used it very publicly for domestic propaganda purposes), their confidence in such an attack should currently be high.

Most likely if they do it indirectly - the proxy force they will use will be the Houthi rebels out of Yemen as a proxy attack force, who are guided by Iran's al-Quds force (the external division of the IRGC). There is a very strong suspicion in the intel world that when the Houthis blew up a Saudi carrier last week with three suicide boats, they thought they were hitting a US Naval vessel.

Now, the question is, what will the US do in retaliation after one of the two events above occur...?
Or maybe the US will stage another Gulf of Tonkin 'incident' as an excuse for yet another asinine war of choice with no benefit to the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2017, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Secure, Undisclosed
1,984 posts, read 1,700,367 times
Reputation: 3728
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd View Post
Is Iran like North Korea in that they need to get noticed now and again or are they much more of a real threat? Imagine them teaming up...
No, and they already are.

Iran just got a bunch of billions of dollars from the US and UN sanctions lifted. They are selling oil hand over fist to Europe. They have all the recognition they need.

DPRK sent something like one or two hundred technicians to Iran to help them with their nuclear program years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2017, 02:11 PM
 
4,534 posts, read 4,929,893 times
Reputation: 6327
If there is a war with Iran let all of the rust belters who wanted to 'show this big city coastal elitists a thing or two' be the first and only ones to sacrifice their children's lives on the altar of Trump.

For ****'s sake you people are lunatics. Can we please go at least just one decade for once without pissing away a trillion dollars for a stupid war in a country where we don't belong? How about using a trillion to build infrastructure, advance R and D, and strengthen our defense? Stupid. Not only a month in and the Trump regime is already trying to stoke phony flames in order to march into Tehran for $2 trillion.

Last edited by fibonacci; 02-04-2017 at 03:40 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top