Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Declines DOJ Request for Stay (radical, brainwash)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How so? Exactly which Constitutional right and of whom's is he violating?
Aliens that have not stepped foot on American soil have no constitutional rights. It is a different story once they reach America. Green card holders and immigrants do have some protection under the constitution but not the same as a citizen.
Aliens that have not stepped foot on American soil have no constitutional rights. It is a different story once they reach America. Green card holders and immigrants do have some protection under the constitution but not the same as a citizen.
As far as Green Card holders... Once they leave the US, they, as foreign citizens not yet readmitted entry to the US, have no Constitutional rights. They are adequately warned about that and accept such known risks before they travel abroad.
Likewise, I, as a US citizen located abroad, have no Constitutional right whatsoever to keep and bear arms in a foreign country which prohibits such.
Here's what the left fails to understand... those located outside the US and have not yet been permitted entry/re-entry by Immigration do not have Constitutional rights. Constitutional rights apply to those located within the US, only. They do not apply worldwide.
It's interesting, this all or nothing approach. Yes, there will probably be vetting lapses. Humans do vetting, humans make mistakes. The problem is, I don't see all this outrage when there are vetting lapses when it comes to owning a firearm. There are so many lapses with the background check process but, oh well.
I think if you want to have the mentality of being 100% sure about everything that poses a risk to citizens, you need to carry that mentality forward on EVERYTHING. Food, drugs, guns, people.
But I just see a bunch of pickers-and-choosers based on preferential fears.
You're probably talking about the states' process of submitting medical information to NICS, which is driven by HIPPA laws. That's not a lapse, it's the issue of privacy rights.
If anything, when it comes to guns, the mistakes are most likely to happen in the opposite direction. I know quite a few people who have been denied when there's no reason for it. It's mostly due to their name being mixed up with someone else, but for a handful of other strange reasons as well. One friend in the city is being denied a purchase permit because he already has a gun. There is no limit on number in the city, only laws about how they must be stored if you have more than five. This is a case of his assigned investigating officer being an ass and either not knowing the laws, or interpreting them incorrectly. Now he has to spend his time and money fighting it.
And, REMINDER, owning a firearm is a constitutionally protected, natural (as in - you're born with it if you're a citizen of this country) right.
There is no way a country cannot have a say in who it wants to let in and who can't. There is no way this judge order will ever stand.
Trump will ultimately win. You are just asking to be embarrassed by your arrogance when this thread gets bumped in a few weeks showing you were wrong just like all these Trump hate threads predicting him to lose in the elections.
Liberals never learn their lessons. Have to come back for more beat downs.
There is no way a country cannot have a say in who it wants to let in and who can't. There is no way this judge order will ever stand.
Trump will ultimately win. You are just asking to be embarrassed by your arrogance when this thread gets bumped in a few weeks showing you were wrong.
Agree 100%. The ruling is just not defensible in any way, shape, or form. Those located outside the US, who have not yet been permitted entry/re-entry by Immigration at a port of entry simply have no Constitutional rights. Just like I, a US citizen, have no Constitutional right to keep and bear arms in a foreign country which prohibits such.
Those present in the US on (work, student, etc.) visas or green cards are made aware of the risks of leaving the US to travel abroad. As a foreigner, who must travel on their foreign passport, they have no guarantee of re-entry to the US.
It's a shame that so many are ignorant of those facts. The ignorance is creating a lot of strife.
There is no way a country cannot have a say in who it wants to let in and who can't. There is no way this judge order will ever stand.
Trump will ultimately win. You are just asking to be embarrassed by your arrogance when this thread gets bumped in a few weeks showing you were wrong just like all these Trump hate threads predicting him to lose in the elections.
Liberals never learn their lessons. Have to come back for more beat downs.
"liberals never learn their lesson so us real smart conservatives keep voting for war and trickle down economics because that seems to work!"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
