Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-06-2017, 10:07 AM
 
11,989 posts, read 5,253,466 times
Reputation: 7284

Advertisements

What amazes me is how many mainstream conservatives are buying into Trump's nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2017, 10:11 AM
 
624 posts, read 368,705 times
Reputation: 338
I don't believe in any polls until we go to vote again
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2017, 10:12 AM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,914,365 times
Reputation: 9225
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
I'm honestly concerned about the people that can't accept the fact that the polls are not reliable.

It's as if the people on the left learned nothing from this past election.
He didn't say polls are unreliable. He said negative polls are "fake". Huge difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2017, 10:12 AM
 
624 posts, read 368,705 times
Reputation: 338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
What amazes me is how many mainstream conservatives are buying into Trump's nonsense.
You did alot of research on Hillary Clinton and George Soros and not smart enough to realize politicians are bought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2017, 10:18 AM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,352 posts, read 28,426,105 times
Reputation: 24876
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
He didn't say polls are unreliable. He said negative polls are "fake". Huge difference.
You don't consider the New York Times poll showing that Hillary had an 85% chance of winning as being fake? Really?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2017, 10:18 AM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,914,365 times
Reputation: 9225
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
You don't consider the New York Times poll showing that Hillary had an 85% chance of winning as being fake?
Words mean things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2017, 10:19 AM
 
18,986 posts, read 9,013,499 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
You don't consider the New York Times poll showing that Hillary had an 85% chance of winning as being fake?
But will you consider any poll that is positive to Trump to be legitimate? Because that's pretty much what Trump is saying here. You can't have it both ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2017, 10:20 AM
 
51,584 posts, read 25,589,248 times
Reputation: 37784
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffbase40 View Post
Let me guess, they conducted this poll with 50% Californians and 50% New Yorkers.
Probably so. But since it is a Raleigh-based firm, they probably called some local yokels away from their bathroom monitoring duties to interview.

But I wouldn't pay any attention to it if I were you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2017, 10:20 AM
 
25,781 posts, read 16,408,424 times
Reputation: 15965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Empidonax View Post
The reality show star has a hard time with reality!

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...74430800539648
The pollsters made their own bed. No one believes them anymore.

I don't need polls to tell me how my President is doing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2017, 10:20 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,490,969 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
He didn't say polls are unreliable. He said negative polls are "fake". Huge difference.
How did Hillary get 85% of chance?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top