Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LOL at all the unanymous clinging to the rules by all these Putunists.
Deliberating the qualifications of a potential cabinet member by stating your opinion of that candidate and then trying to back it up by reading the words of a nationally reknownked civil rights leader( THE TOPIC OF CONCERN BEING RACISM no less)-you are trying with a straight face to convince us that she was merely seeking to 'impune' him???
LOL maybe that sort of reaching works in podunkistan where youre all from, but not in the world.
1. Milo might have been in physcal danger.
2. So Berkeley authorities took measures to protect him.
3. Elizabeth Warren posed no threat to anyone in the chamber by reading the words of Coretta Scott King to back up her argyment.
4. She was silenced by Senate Republicans.
Her freedom of speech was stomped upon by a deliberately misinterpreted senate rule because those in power didnt want her to speak the truth.
That's quite a bit worse than Milo being taken away for his safety by those in power seeking to protect him by an angry mob of anarchists.
If you cant speak your mind on the senate floor then freedom of speech in America is basically suspended.
The truth?
What's your version of the truth?
From what I've read, Warren's truth is that black people aren't as intelligent as other races who have the brain power to get an ID. She is a racist pretending as though her opponent is a racist.
In fact from a freedom of speech standpoint, what happened to Senator Warren was FAR WORSE than what happened to Milo.
You sound like an anarchist. You are a dangerously naive and uninformed concept of a Republic.
Quote:
He was removed out of safety concerns, otherwise he would have spoken.
Indeed. All these people involved were civilians. Milo was deprived of his civil rights by a criminal band of terrorists under the banner of Antifa. .
Quote:
She was stopped mid-sentence by the senate majority leader of the United States because republicans didnt want to confront the words of a civil rights leader.
Apples and grenades.
Congress does not receive the right of free speech or free assembly as civilians . They are elected officials. They have the power to establish the rules of conduct in their own assembly. .
One was a guy who touts free speech and has anti-super liberal views who literally was barred from speaking due to physical violence by crazy thugs and setting a campus on fire and attacking innocent people.
The other is an elected politician in Congress who tried to bring up an opinionated, race-baiting attempt and was shut down due to established laws and processes. Nobody was injured. Noone was hurt. The only thing that was hurt was Warren's stupid attempt at race-baiting, and now she's using it for attention for "OMG THEYRE RACIST! THEY SHUT DOWN THE WIFE OF A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVIST DURING BLACK HISTORY MONTH! C HOW RACIST DEY R!?"
From what I've read, Warren's truth is that black people aren't as intelligent as other races who have the brain power to get an ID. She is a racist pretending as though her opponent is a racist.
18Montclair you show an inability to grasp simple concepts.
There are limits to free speech, not all speech is protected. Hence libel laws, etc...
Warren doesn't have the right to besmirch fellow senators on the floor. She can on CNN and elsewhere.
Milo had a legal right to give a speech at a paid for event approved in advance by the college and funded by pro-Milo students that invited him. Violent-Liberals broke laws to silence him through violence.
Please think before posting more vacuous nonsense.
18Montclair you show an inability to grasp simple concepts.
There are limits to free speech, not all speech is protected. Hence libel laws, etc...
Warren doesn't have the right to besmirch fellow senators on the floor. She can on CNN and elsewhere.
Milo had a legal right to give a speech at a paid for event approved in advance by the college and funded by pro-Milo students that invited him. Violent-Liberals broke laws to silence him through violence.
Please think before posting more vacuous nonsense.
blah blah blah
Like I said:
Deliberating the qualifications of a potential cabinet member by stating your opinion of that candidate and then trying to back it up by reading the words of a nationally reknownked civil rights leader( THE TOPIC OF CONCERN BEING RACISM no less)-you are trying with a straight face to convince us that she was merely seeking to 'impune' him???
LOL maybe that sort of reaching works in podunkistan where youre all from, but not in the world.
Morning Joe has it right. They handed her a BIG WIN
Just as the actions in Berkeley raised the profile of Milo Bartakamous.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
