Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What Will The Appeals Court Do?
Votes to Reinstate the Executive Order 37 29.84%
Votes to Continue the Stay by the Seattle Court 77 62.10%
Votes to Restrict New Visitors Only 7 5.65%
Votes to Send the Stay Back to Seattle 3 2.42%
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2017, 06:22 PM
 
Location: Billings, MT
9,884 posts, read 10,974,080 times
Reputation: 14180

Advertisements

I find it interesting that obama used that law to write EOs 19 times.
clinton did it 12 times.
Bush did it 6 times.
NONE of those times had a TRO against them.
As I say, interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-18-2017, 07:20 AM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,100,379 times
Reputation: 11535
Many people have exchanged being Americans for comfort.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2017, 08:48 AM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,924,139 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Obama gave Trump two templates to use, the one for the ban on Iraqi immigrants, and the one for the ban on South Sudanese immigrants.

"By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, find that the situation in and in relation to South Sudan, which has been marked by activities that threaten the peace, security, or stability of South Sudan and the surrounding region, including widespread violence and atrocities, human rights abuses, recruitment and use of child soldiers, attacks on peacekeepers, and obstruction of humanitarian operations, poses an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat. ... I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 1(a) of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions)." - Executive Order 13664 of April 3, 2014

[emphasis mine]
https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnews...edirected=true

The full text of the original Executive Order is here (see Section 4):

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-ce...h_sudan_eo.pdf

All Trump had to do was copy this Executive Order and add 6 countries.
To what do you attribute the present administration's failure to do so?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2017, 08:51 AM
 
18,323 posts, read 10,661,093 times
Reputation: 8602
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
Many people have exchanged being Americans for comfort.

I see you are talking about yourself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2017, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,100,379 times
Reputation: 11535
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1.. View Post
I see you are talking about yourself.
I wonder if you're ok man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2017, 09:52 AM
 
3,569 posts, read 2,520,572 times
Reputation: 2290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redraven View Post
I find it interesting that obama used that law to write EOs 19 times.
clinton did it 12 times.
Bush did it 6 times.
NONE of those times had a TRO against them.
As I say, interesting.
Because none of them went to the Trump extreme. None of them tried to bar permanent residents or people with valid work and student visas.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Obama gave Trump two templates to use, the one for the ban on Iraqi immigrants, and the one for the ban on South Sudanese immigrants.

"By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, find that the situation in and in relation to South Sudan, which has been marked by activities that threaten the peace, security, or stability of South Sudan and the surrounding region, including widespread violence and atrocities, human rights abuses, recruitment and use of child soldiers, attacks on peacekeepers, and obstruction of humanitarian operations, poses an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat. ... I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 1(a) of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions)." - Executive Order 13664 of April 3, 2014

[emphasis mine]
https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnews...edirected=true

The full text of the original Executive Order is here (see Section 4):

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-ce...h_sudan_eo.pdf

All Trump had to do was copy this Executive Order and add 6 countries.
You haven't the expertise to interpret this--or you are intentionally obfuscating. In the bolded section, note the conditional clause "unrestricted . . . entry . . . of aliens determined to meet one or more criteria in section 1(a) of this order." What is section 1(a)? It is the section that determines which Sudanese leaders are subject to sanctions for their crimes against peace & humanity.

The short version is: we are sanctioning elements of the regime who are contributing to crimes against humanity, and we are not going to let those hostis humani generis--enemies of all humanity--enter the country.

What's the deal with people trying to pin Trump's travel ban on Obama?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 05:10 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,064 posts, read 17,006,525 times
Reputation: 30213
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCityTheBridge View Post
Because none of them went to the Trump extreme. None of them tried to bar permanent residents or people with valid work and student visas.
Unfortunately given that much of the world is at war with the West, see Security Theater v. Profiling - Are Blocked Streets Warranted?we do need to think about some restrictions. We cannot be quite so open to people that are here to destroy and not build our society.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 04:32 AM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,924,139 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCityTheBridge View Post
Because none of them went to the Trump extreme. None of them tried to bar permanent residents or people with valid work and student visas.



You haven't the expertise to interpret this--or you are intentionally obfuscating. In the bolded section, note the conditional clause "unrestricted . . . entry . . . of aliens determined to meet one or more criteria in section 1(a) of this order." What is section 1(a)? It is the section that determines which Sudanese leaders are subject to sanctions for their crimes against peace & humanity.

The short version is: we are sanctioning elements of the regime who are contributing to crimes against humanity, and we are not going to let those hostis humani generis--enemies of all humanity--enter the country.

What's the deal with people trying to pin Trump's travel ban on Obama?
Re: the bold: Personally, I've no idea of Mr. Mircea's intent.

Speaking of intent, so-called President's still active campaign web site illustrates his intent:

Quote:
​DONALD J. TRUMP STATEMENT ON PREVENTING MUSLIM IMMIGRATION

(New York, NY) December 7th, 2015, -- Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on. ...
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-r...im-immigration

This is & was his intent. Unfortunately (for him) those whom he called 'so-called Judges' aren't falling for his, as usual, attempts at conning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2017, 09:32 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,064 posts, read 17,006,525 times
Reputation: 30213
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiGeekGuest View Post
Re: the bold: Personally, I've no idea of Mr. Mircea's intent.

Speaking of intent, so-called President's still active campaign web site illustrates his intent:



https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-r...im-immigration

This is & was his intent. Unfortunately (for him) those whom he called 'so-called Judges' aren't falling for his, as usual, attempts at conning.
If Trump's intent can be evaluated, why not the judges of Washington State, Hawai'i, Maryland and the 9th Circuit? Maybe they're part of the "resistance" to Trump. I'd bet on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 10:31 AM
 
3,569 posts, read 2,520,572 times
Reputation: 2290
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
If Trump's intent can be evaluated, why not the judges of Washington State, Hawai'i, Maryland and the 9th Circuit? Maybe they're part of the "resistance" to Trump. I'd bet on it.
The Judges' intent is to do their jobs--evaluate the cases before them and make decisions based on the law. There are rules applicable to judges that govern whether they should recuse themselves from cases before them. There are rules governing their interactions with parties. And there is a system of courts that can reverse the rulings of individual judges if they commit errors of law. That you accuse at least 6 judges of a conspiracy against The Donald, TM, is a sign that you are wading in the realm of tin-foil hat conspiracy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top