Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981
I am sure you would. LOL
By the way, I saw your post on the Military life forum, funny as hell (although I have no ideas why you posted that, it has nothing to do with the op) lol hahahha
|
Thank ya.
Some people can be uptight over what seems to me to be not that big of a deal. Or maybe some perceptions have to do with generational--or even national or class--differences. Possibly. I don't really get the prohibitions against the cosmetics of tattoos. Like, if a competent brain surgeon had tattoo "sleeves" up and down his arms are you going to prohibit him from operating on you because you don't like his superficial outward looks?
But maybe I want to prick or poke some female Air Force recruiters too. You know, how well you
look in uniform being pertinent to the discussion. (If you're run time is very poor and you don't look well per physique in dress uniform in the Corps, it will slow up or entirely halt your ability to get promoted.)
But the female Air Force recruiters probably don't think how shapely Joy Villa's hips and a&$ looks in a tight dress is sufficient enough to waive her tattooed arms. Maybe just a difference in recruiting style and difference in criteria of importance.
Just to show I'm an open-minded and fair person willing to fit in with the Obama generation of military men and women. If Joy Villa was formerly Joseph Villa having been born a boy, if she came walking into the recruiters office switching those nice curvy hips in that same dress, I still would still grant her a waiver for the tattoos on her arms.