Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-14-2017, 03:02 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
1,702 posts, read 1,918,951 times
Reputation: 1305

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
I have read the the financials that they HAVE to fill out, contain MUVH MORE info then their tax returns do, so I say NO, if that is true.
A P&L and 2 or 3 years taxes is a pretty common request by a bank if you go in for a loan and are self employed. That does not seem like too big of an ask for someone who wants to be president. The reason they ask for tax returns is that a P&L can be easily kinked. Actual tax returns would require lying to the IRS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2017, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Billings, MT
9,884 posts, read 10,969,651 times
Reputation: 14180
Still waiting for more information about the "emoluments clause".
Which one has trump violated, and exactly how did he violate it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 03:08 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
30,343 posts, read 19,138,862 times
Reputation: 26238
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffrow1 View Post
A P&L and 2 or 3 years taxes is a pretty common request by a bank if you go in for a loan and are self employed. That does not seem like too big of an ask for someone who wants to be president. The reason they ask for tax returns is that a P&L can be easily kinked. Actual tax returns would require lying to the IRS.
I hire lots of employees and have never asked them for their tax returns, don't care. When I hired Trump to work for me as President, still don't care about his taxes because they are irrelevant to the job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 03:11 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,717,658 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Absolutely. Along with any non-profits.
Tax exempt, 501 (c) 3 orgs, are required to disclose and make inf available to the general public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 03:14 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
1,702 posts, read 1,918,951 times
Reputation: 1305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redraven View Post
Still waiting for more information about the "emoluments clause".
Which one has trump violated, and exactly how did he violate it?
Are you asking me? I don't know or even particularly care. It seems pretty obvious that he is going to be allowed to do pretty much whatever he wants until he becomes too much of problem for the republican congress. Not much I can do about that, however in the future I would like full disclosure before giving someone carte blanc with our money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 03:18 PM
 
Location: annandale, va & slidell, la
9,267 posts, read 5,116,634 times
Reputation: 8471
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffrow1 View Post
Should we require tax returns and full financial disclosure from all presidential candidates? In light of the extraordinary amount of latitude we seem to give a sitting president with regards to conflicts of interest don't we deserve full disclosure? If I have to excuse any and all conflicts I want to know ahead of time the potential problems and vote accordingly. Much more should have been made of Trumps lack of tax returns IMO.
Why don't you suggest that to your representative and make it a law. Then you don't need to use the issue as a straw man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 03:20 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
1,702 posts, read 1,918,951 times
Reputation: 1305
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalmove View Post
Why don't you suggest that to your representative and make it a law. Then you don't need to use the issue as a straw man.
I have and that is my point in the first place. Make it a law, as for 45.... too late now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 03:25 PM
 
Location: Billings, MT
9,884 posts, read 10,969,651 times
Reputation: 14180
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffrow1 View Post
Are you asking me? I don't know or even particularly care. It seems pretty obvious that he is going to be allowed to do pretty much whatever he wants until he becomes too much of problem for the republican congress. Not much I can do about that, however in the future I would like full disclosure before giving someone carte blanc with our money.
I am asking anybody who referred to the "emoluments clause".
I merely want clarification of exactly what they have in mind. Statements have been made calling for impeachment because of the "emoluments clause".
I merely want to know which one they are referring too (there are actually two of them), and what actions or lack of actions they find to be impeachable offenses.
If you are one of those people, and "don't know or even particularly care." I would be ashamed to admit it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 04:53 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
1,702 posts, read 1,918,951 times
Reputation: 1305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redraven View Post
I am asking anybody who referred to the "emoluments clause".
I merely want clarification of exactly what they have in mind. Statements have been made calling for impeachment because of the "emoluments clause".
I merely want to know which one they are referring too (there are actually two of them), and what actions or lack of actions they find to be impeachable offenses.
If you are one of those people, and "don't know or even particularly care." I would be ashamed to admit it.
I hope you find someone to pick your fight with..... I'm not interested.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,687 posts, read 21,039,129 times
Reputation: 14238
i think presidents should get vetted- but not with the same congress stand offs- just qualify to be president as you are a fed employee
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top