Quote:
Originally Posted by arjay57
Wow, is it correct that 1 out of 4 doctors in America is an immigrant?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91
How many doctors routinely come from the 7 nations affected by the temporary immigration hult?
How will a temporary halt in immigration cause a vital pipeline of talent will dry up?
|
Exactly, don't believe everything you read hook, line, and sinker. Many of our foreign MD's do not come from those 7 countries, nor is a full 25% foreign to begin with.
However, rest assured Obama & Co were lowering the standards to allow many more foreign MD's to be able to pass the boards and become MD's over here.
Why you might ask?
Simple, because the combo of Obamacare and the stifling regulations requiring our doctors to comply with tons of bureaucratic rules to get paid a pittance of what they use to, has driven many an experienced MD away from medicine.
Just imagine if 10 years ago you would get paid $200 to do a procedure through Medicare and you didn't need three different paper pushers to sign off on it. But now days you must get on the phone with at least one or more people, without the education to understand why the patient needs the procedure. You must explain in simplistic terminology what will happen if the patient doesn't get the treatment. The main convincer is not necessarily what is best for the patient, but rather will it cost more in the long run if the patient does not get it.
Yes, MD's use to be
when this crap started, now they are just
Plus that $200 payment has been reduced to about $30 for reimbursement. How is that for spending all that time in medical school and many years clawing your way up the ladder, only to have your income reduced to that of a plumber (no offense to plumbers).
Also, MD's use to use their own minds when treating patients, but now many are forced to use tablets/computers to hear symptoms, then punch it into a program. That program in turn "suggests" a course of Tx along a certain line of thinking (hint: costs are involved). For the MD to go outside that "suggestion", risks them not getting paid and/or the procedure/testing not being covered by their insurance.
If it is Medicare or especially Medicaid, rest assured it will not be unless a bunch of hoops are jumped through, typically not by the MD's staff. No the MD must personally justify it to the bureaucrats which creates frustration and wastes their time.
Lets not forget the other biggy, that being how the Democrats are in bed with the trial lawyers, and many MD's have decided to practice without medical malpractice because it costs a fortune, even for those who never have had a lawsuit filed against them.
Thus many MD go bare and do not have coverage in the states that allow it. Not a great feeling to have to plan all your assets to be shielded from lawsuits because you cannot afford and/or will not pay the astronomical costs of medical malpractice insurance.
All this just so the trail lawyers can feed their profession off of it with frivolous lawsuits, and trying to hit the lottery for unscrupulous people.
Also all sorts of PA's, NP's and the like are being promoted as a less expensive alternate to MD's, and in some cases are making as much, without all the liability. When Obamacare was hatched, they envisioned a huge increase on the medical profession, and healthcare rationing was a real concern. Since it takes fully 6 years to become an practicing MD after your 4 years of undergrad college, it is not as if you can churn them out like other professions. So again, standards and level of care criteria have been reduced to allow those with inferior educations to practice medicine. Don't get me wrong, there are some fine PA's and NP's, but they are not MD's, now are they.
Regardless, rationing of healthcare was always going to be part of the equation for many a socialist. Also, determining who is more worthy of the rationed healthcare was destined to lead to panels deciding that a 18 year old life was more important than 65 year old life. Never mind that the 65 year old might be a law abiding citizen who worked their whole life, served their country, etc.,,,,,and the 18 year old has been shot and stabbed many times in his few years because he is a gang-banger. No, to people like Ezekiel Emanuel, bioethicist who is a leader of that frightening group (Center for American Progress), lives value are scored.
Lastly, lets not forget that just like many police organizations that are liberal and do not represent the views of the police in the field, the AMA is a liberal group that originally promoted/touted Obamacare, right along with the AARP.
Yet the very notion of AHA is the anathema of what they would want, if they knew any better. Those groups are suppose to protect their members, not sell them out just for ideological reasons. Yet MD's and elderly patients alike had their groups working with Obama & Co, against their own best interests.
Rest assured liberalism is a mental disorder.