Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-14-2017, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Virginia
10,093 posts, read 6,433,756 times
Reputation: 27661

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
Yes, it is.

Women should be picking up the tab now. They can afford it.
Oh, women do. But then they are referred to as aggressive feminazis by the insecure men who are trying to date them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2017, 02:25 PM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,436,622 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Just grab 'em by the "kitty."

Rich guy I know sez it works for him every time.

Give it a try.

Or be like Billary, and take it a few steps further.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 02:28 PM
 
12,905 posts, read 15,660,053 times
Reputation: 9394
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokinouta View Post
Ya think? If she was the democrat's first lady they'd be protecting her from insults like pitbulls. lol

Since when is a model a hooker? Oh, since she's Trumps wife. lol
So apparently this was a private conversation between an NYT reporter and Emily R (not even going to try to spell it). It's not as if the reporter was "reporting" on Melania. Sounds as if the two were having a discussing about Melania and the male reporter indicated that he heard or thought Melania had been a "hooker." Right or wrong, there's a lot of people who have questions about what her "job" was when she first came to this country: model, escort. Those rumors were floating around years ago. So if the conversation went as I read, it doesn't sound like he was ****-shaming her but discussing the mystery of her previous career.

But, yeah, nothing's private anymore--ready to be tweeted at a moment's notice. That reported needs to be more circumspect about what he's saying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,350,196 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vector1 View Post
Nice try to make a claim, then with the time it took you to type out your reply, you could have cut and pasted a legit link.
Also, as far as off handed conversations, this was an actual reporter, not just some random kook (from either side) being quoted, now was it.
Deflect much?
Yes I could have...an actually I did not even have to...I had the page up in another window. But there are things so obviously that even the challenged can't help but find them...and given the quote your post suggest you are simply refusing to do the minimum. Looking it up yourself also would expose you to how well disseminated the stories were.

It was not a reporter who had any role in reporting on Trump or Mrs. Trump. He apparently has some other role at the paper. So basically just another person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 03:23 PM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,381,866 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
I seem to remember another "couple" in the White House named Bill and Monica.

Ew.


Uh, cool?


I'm not sure how that is relevant to the topic under discussion, however.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 04:27 PM
 
1,501 posts, read 1,727,089 times
Reputation: 1444
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristineVA View Post
So apparently this was a private conversation between an NYT reporter and Emily R (not even going to try to spell it). It's not as if the reporter was "reporting" on Melania. Sounds as if the two were having a discussing about Melania and the male reporter indicated that he heard or thought Melania had been a "hooker." Right or wrong, there's a lot of people who have questions about what her "job" was when she first came to this country: model, escort. Those rumors were floating around years ago. So if the conversation went as I read, it doesn't sound like he was ****-shaming her but discussing the mystery of her previous career.

But, yeah, nothing's private anymore--ready to be tweeted at a moment's notice. That reported needs to be more circumspect about what he's saying.
When the president-elect does that, it's just locker room talk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 04:35 PM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,436,622 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Uh, cool?


I'm not sure how that is relevant to the topic under discussion, however.
It's relevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 05:01 PM
 
19,637 posts, read 12,226,539 times
Reputation: 26431
Quote:
Originally Posted by cruisetheworld View Post
No such thing as a "very attractive American woman." Which is why most are jealous of the types such as Melania Trump or Giselle Bundchen. Only in their dreams could they hope to look half as good. If Melania was ugly, this would be a non-issue.
No it would still be an issue. Its about going after Trump, any way any how.

There are many beautiful feminine young American women. My extended family has them, sweet, pretty, not all tatted and pierced, dress like ladies, and two just got engaged last year (to decent young men).

I would not call them hookers, and would not call Melania a hooker unless I knew for certain she had been one. Even then, Melania is a middle aged mom now, she was thrust into this political world and I feel for her. Its gross of that reporter to say that so casually. Glad he was outed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 06:09 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,749,968 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
I didn't know that Michelle was born male.
She wasn't.

But you can google around right now and find right-wing websites that claim this. As I'm quite sure you know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2017, 06:34 PM
 
5,722 posts, read 5,800,250 times
Reputation: 4381
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
Well, this liberal doesn't care whether Melania ever took money for sex.

Nor would I have cared if Michelle was born male.

It's not my business, and it is irrelevant to my opinion of their spouses.
I think the issue with some women is that she's from another country. Remember..this comes from people that support the party that is supposedly the party of diversity lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top