Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ya think? If she was the democrat's first lady they'd be protecting her from insults like pitbulls. lol
Since when is a model a hooker? Oh, since she's Trumps wife. lol
So apparently this was a private conversation between an NYT reporter and Emily R (not even going to try to spell it). It's not as if the reporter was "reporting" on Melania. Sounds as if the two were having a discussing about Melania and the male reporter indicated that he heard or thought Melania had been a "hooker." Right or wrong, there's a lot of people who have questions about what her "job" was when she first came to this country: model, escort. Those rumors were floating around years ago. So if the conversation went as I read, it doesn't sound like he was ****-shaming her but discussing the mystery of her previous career.
But, yeah, nothing's private anymore--ready to be tweeted at a moment's notice. That reported needs to be more circumspect about what he's saying.
Nice try to make a claim, then with the time it took you to type out your reply, you could have cut and pasted a legit link.
Also, as far as off handed conversations, this was an actual reporter, not just some random kook (from either side) being quoted, now was it.
Deflect much?
Yes I could have...an actually I did not even have to...I had the page up in another window. But there are things so obviously that even the challenged can't help but find them...and given the quote your post suggest you are simply refusing to do the minimum. Looking it up yourself also would expose you to how well disseminated the stories were.
It was not a reporter who had any role in reporting on Trump or Mrs. Trump. He apparently has some other role at the paper. So basically just another person.
So apparently this was a private conversation between an NYT reporter and Emily R (not even going to try to spell it). It's not as if the reporter was "reporting" on Melania. Sounds as if the two were having a discussing about Melania and the male reporter indicated that he heard or thought Melania had been a "hooker." Right or wrong, there's a lot of people who have questions about what her "job" was when she first came to this country: model, escort. Those rumors were floating around years ago. So if the conversation went as I read, it doesn't sound like he was ****-shaming her but discussing the mystery of her previous career.
But, yeah, nothing's private anymore--ready to be tweeted at a moment's notice. That reported needs to be more circumspect about what he's saying.
When the president-elect does that, it's just locker room talk.
No such thing as a "very attractive American woman." Which is why most are jealous of the types such as Melania Trump or Giselle Bundchen. Only in their dreams could they hope to look half as good. If Melania was ugly, this would be a non-issue.
No it would still be an issue. Its about going after Trump, any way any how.
There are many beautiful feminine young American women. My extended family has them, sweet, pretty, not all tatted and pierced, dress like ladies, and two just got engaged last year (to decent young men).
I would not call them hookers, and would not call Melania a hooker unless I knew for certain she had been one. Even then, Melania is a middle aged mom now, she was thrust into this political world and I feel for her. Its gross of that reporter to say that so casually. Glad he was outed.
Well, this liberal doesn't care whether Melania ever took money for sex.
Nor would I have cared if Michelle was born male.
It's not my business, and it is irrelevant to my opinion of their spouses.
I think the issue with some women is that she's from another country. Remember..this comes from people that support the party that is supposedly the party of diversity lol.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.