Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-10-2017, 03:14 PM
 
8,061 posts, read 4,884,494 times
Reputation: 2460

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sky1949 View Post
I lived through the Watergate fiasco. This currently unravelling story of Flynn, pre-election Russian intelligence communications with the Trump campaign, hacking of emails, lying to the vice-president, etc. is taking on an eerie, uncomfortable familiarity and ugly taste. I think this is leading to a seriously terminal legal or political event for this administration. It's "deja vu all over again" as Yogi Berra would have put it.
Its funny now the tables are turned how Senor Obama people will be looked at for disclosing and unmasking Americans. Truth is The Clintons had more to do with Russian than the Trumps!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-10-2017, 03:21 PM
 
3,357 posts, read 1,233,304 times
Reputation: 2302
I,too, remember. I was in college and my mom took pity on me and brought me a tv (a church rummage sale reject). We all sat around enthralled at the hijinks we saw on that gray and white screen. I have followed politics like a hawk ever since....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2017, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,644 posts, read 26,374,838 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzy24 View Post
I'll go off topic too...As if conservatives wouldn't have given Hillary a hard time if she won the WH. Give me a damn break!




Difference being that Hillary is a actually a criminal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2017, 03:51 PM
 
Location: Twin Falls Idaho
4,996 posts, read 2,444,101 times
Reputation: 2540
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Difference being that Hillary is a actually a criminal.
*yawn* Hillary Clinton is no longer relevant...and one cannot be a criminal with out a conviction, I guess the concept of Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law...escapes you--odd..bet you can quote the 2nd amendment!


I would never call Trump a criminal..as he is afforded the same protections under our system.

Asinine, willfully stupid, pathologically self-centered, clinically paranoid and more than a little deranged..but I would never call him criminal--until he is convicted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2017, 03:53 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,607,699 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jstarling View Post
What scandals?
Lois Lerner ring a bell?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2017, 03:55 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,365,659 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
There is no topic to stick to.


Nine months of investigations haven't yielded proof of anything except that Obama spied on an opposing party's campaign and the Hillary campaign conspired and colluded with reporters to cheat during a presidential election.
Heres a ton of unclassified information on what was revealed. Are you unaware, or just choosing to misrepresent the problem?

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2017, 04:00 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,607,699 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilEyeFleegle View Post
one cannot be a criminal with out a conviction
Nobody ever explained to you the urban dictionary is not a real dictionary?

From the Oxford dictionary ( https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/criminal ):

Criminal
Noun - A person who has committed a crime.

( https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/crime )

Crime
Noun - An action or omission which constitutes an offence and is punishable by law.

You do not have to be charged or convicted in order to be a criminal; you only need to be a person who has committed an unlawful act.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2017, 04:05 PM
 
5,792 posts, read 5,104,962 times
Reputation: 8008
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
Without a doubt! Even a non-scandal warranted 13 hearings and a waste of taxpayer dollars.
Yeah, the cost of all these hearing and investigations are such a waste of taxpayer money. But all those security details for the weekend trips to Florida and the New York stays for family members....they are real cheap in comparison. LOL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2017, 04:07 PM
 
5,792 posts, read 5,104,962 times
Reputation: 8008
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Heres a ton of unclassified information on what was revealed. Are you unaware, or just choosing to misrepresent the problem?

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf
You are trying to talk sense to a brain dead fox news junkie. They've been brainwashed by Fox and friends.....hopeless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2017, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Twin Falls Idaho
4,996 posts, read 2,444,101 times
Reputation: 2540
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
Nobody ever explained to you the urban dictionary is not a real dictionary?

From the Oxford dictionary ( https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/criminal ):

Criminal
Noun - A person who has committed a crime.

( https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/crime )

Crime
Noun - An action or omission which constitutes an offence and is punishable by law.

You do not have to be charged or convicted in order to be a criminal; you only need to be a person who has committed an unlawful act.
Fair enough..however...if one is not proven to be a criminal..than are they a criminal? For the purposes of conversation.

Belief is not proof..period.

I will concede personal knowledge of a crime.. that if you saw a crime take place..and you knew the person who committed it..you would be entitled to use the term.

While there are many criminals out there who will never be caught...one still cannot apply the term to a specific person..without proof--well, I guess you can...but most reasonable people will not believe it..and why should they?

Appreciate the snark re. Urban Dictionary..it's what I'd expect...

If you want a laugh though..check out my profile..makes it even funnier

Last edited by EvilEyeFleegle; 05-10-2017 at 05:45 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top