Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2017, 07:44 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,739,641 times
Reputation: 9728

Advertisements

As I was watching the news a couple of days ago, they showed footage of the dam in California and the evacuation. And it was impossible not to notice the large number of obese people. Made me wonder, why is there no war on sugar? We have wars on drugs and terrorism, but compared to the costs obesity and resulting conditions cause for the healthcare system, drugs and terrorism are peanuts.

Why are there no clear warnings, like for instance, Don't drink cola! Nobody seems to have a problem with Don't smoke! or Don't take drugs! Are politicians and agencies paid by Coke, Pepsi etc.?

I have seen several documentaries on sugar over the years, the amounts of it people in the West consume are crazy.

Shouldn't public health be far more important than any business profits?

 
Old 02-17-2017, 07:47 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,310,667 times
Reputation: 7364
I guess you were asleep the entire time Michele Obama was prompting healthy eating, eating clean?
 
Old 02-17-2017, 07:49 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,351,440 times
Reputation: 73932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
As

Shouldn't public health be far more important than any business profits?
When has it ever been?

The corn lobby own congress so you can forget it.
 
Old 02-17-2017, 07:50 AM
 
Location: The analog world
17,077 posts, read 13,364,015 times
Reputation: 22904
Well, you could probably start with the Fanjul brothers.
 
Old 02-17-2017, 07:51 AM
 
11,558 posts, read 12,050,932 times
Reputation: 17757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
I guess you were asleep the entire time Michele Obama was prompting healthy eating, eating clean?
Was that the same Michelle Obama who was caught ordering fattening spare ribs and chowing them down at a restaurant in Vail, CO?
 
Old 02-17-2017, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,211 posts, read 19,516,181 times
Reputation: 21679
Quote:
Originally Posted by katie45 View Post
Was that the same Michelle Obama who was caught ordering fattening spare ribs and chowing them down at a restaurant in Vail, CO?
Everything in moderation, sweetheart.
 
Old 02-17-2017, 07:55 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,739,641 times
Reputation: 9728
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
I guess you were asleep the entire time Michele Obama was prompting healthy eating, eating clean?
Well, many people did not like her, nor is she a qualified nutritionist or anything. So people thought it was merely her personal opinion that she tried to force on them.
 
Old 02-17-2017, 07:59 AM
 
Location: USA
18,491 posts, read 9,157,203 times
Reputation: 8523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
Shouldn't public health be far more important than any business profits?
Maybe in Europe. Not here in America.
 
Old 02-17-2017, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Minnysoda
10,659 posts, read 10,724,472 times
Reputation: 6745
Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
When has it ever been?

The corn lobby own congress so you can forget it.

except they don't use corn to make sugar
 
Old 02-17-2017, 08:00 AM
 
4,491 posts, read 2,225,152 times
Reputation: 1992
There are a number of issues with fighting sugar.

1) The corn lobby, responsible for the production of the sugar alternative high fructose corn syrup, are highly active in congress. This is why lobbying is bad.

2) Libertarians and conservatives resist with passion laws that add additional taxes onto high sugar products. This is A) because their congressmen say it's bad (who are paid by the lobbyists) and B) they've been told government is the antonym to freedom.

3) Food companies also lobby. It's often noted how many poor people are obese while on food stamps and people always ask, why doesn't food stamps require healthier foods. Well, Coca-Cola is one of the biggest lobbyists for SNAP benefits.

Basically, call your congressmen and demand changes in lobbyists laws. That's almost the only thing that I think will work. You can sign an online petition or hold up a sign with a crowd of people, but honestly, why bother? You can Google your representatives phone number and talk directly to them about why Coca Cola should not decide what's available in Food Stamps.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top