Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That Republicans "won the battle but lost the war"
That Democrats are favored in the future
True or false?
You can NEVER count ANY party OUT. History is full of politicians and political parties who were commonly assumed to be ruined: Richard Nixon in 1962, Democrats in 1972, 1988 and now, Repubs in 1976, 2008, etc. If Dems could find a young, energetic candidate that could motivate the young voters, they would have a good chance. Cory Booker and Gavin Newsom come to mind. Barry Sanders could have beat Trump if he was given the chance, but alas he's too old.
It is a choice election. A vote for somebody else was a vote for Hillary and she is def. not going to be pro-life.
He also said he changed his mind on abortion.
I love how you don't think it is fair to point out Hillary is very pro choice.
so you couldn't even go two sentences without mentioning Hillary as I challenged you to do? Good to know how brain washed you are....does Hillary come to you in your dreams as the boogey man too?
And again you don't address how a group that supposedly bases their entire world view on their moral convictions turned out in record numbers to support an adulteror , philanderer, twice divorced individual who magically "changed his mind of abortion" when he started seeking the GOP nomination....glad we've laid the cards on the table here....
I love how you think you set the terms of the debate. You don't get to control what points I can make.
Yes, because I don't have your liberal opinion, I'm brainwashed.
You are suggesting it makes sense for them to help elect Hillary Clinton, the most pro-abortion and pro Planned Parenthood candidate in history vs take a chance with Trump.
Obviously they don't get the conservative judge that Trump appointed with your candidate Hillary.
so you couldn't even go two sentences without mentioning Hillary as I challenged you to do? Good to know how brain washed you are....does Hillary come to you in your dreams as the boogey man too?
And again you don't address how a group that supposedly bases their entire world view on their moral convictions turned out in record numbers to support an adulteror , philanderer, twice divorced individual who magically "changed his mind of abortion" when he started seeking the GOP nomination....glad we've laid the cards on the table here....
I love how you think you set the terms of the debate. You don't get to control what points I can make.
Yes, because I don't have your liberal opinion, I'm brainwashed.
I asked you to make an argument for your Daddy that didn't involve mentioned one against Hillary...I know thinking is tough....it;s why so many Trump lemmings try to avoid it.
you seem to be confused, take a seat and get a cookie perhaps...all I've asked is for any of your Trump lemmings to make an argument that doesn't involve Hillary...which you all seem unable to do....it seems the sight of pants suits has given you all PTSD somehow...
I asked you to make an argument for your Daddy that didn't involve mentioned one against Hillary...I know thinking is tough....it;s why so many Trump lemmings try to avoid it.
Seems like all you do is insult people on here.
You wanted them to make a choice that helps your liberal pro-abortion candidate get elected. You are frustrated that they aren't dumb.
False. However, I see the Republican Party becoming more moderate in the future. Most modern Republicans are socially moderate and Trump has turned the party left on trade and immigration. Fair trade, protectionism, and closed borders are all liberal ideas. Trump recently praised Australia's health care system which is quite socialist. At the state level Republicans are once again realizing that low taxes don't equal economic growth. 4 Republican states, including mine, have raised taxes. From my perspective conservative ideology is on the way out (not anytime soon, but with the next couple generations), which isn't a bad thing, being so idealistic isn't a good thing, and that's why many of the red states are able to fix budget problems, because they are more willing to be open to new ideas.
Nationalism on the other hand I do think is grasping at straws and basically this is the end for nationalism to be influential in America, which is great, nationalism is a terrible disease. It's entirely possible to be patriotic and be for law and order, and not be nationalistic.
The Democratic Party has some real soul searching to do if they want to become relevant anywhere outside the major cities and and a small handful of other areas.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
