Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-25-2017, 07:20 PM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,958,439 times
Reputation: 7983

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by KS_Referee View Post
I was wrong. I just read the 1st and 5th Amendment implications regarding net neutrality, and despite what I was told, the text appears to prohibit ANY limitation of free speech as the ISPs themselves will NOT be engaging in the speech as did cable providers who selected content and placed their own commentary on their network. ISPs will simply be a conduit for the free exchange of information.

There is a downloadable .pdf located right next to "FCC Record:" slightly down the page. This document is the TEXT of the FCC New Neutrality regulation.

https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-rel...internet-order

Constitutional considerations begin at paragraph 544 of the document.
It's not good that the admin wants to undermine this right?

I'm glad you did some research, hopefully you'll join the right side of this fight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-25-2017, 07:22 PM
 
6,822 posts, read 6,634,329 times
Reputation: 3769
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDnurse View Post
I'm buying as little as possible during the next 4 years. Loans are getting paid off early.

Eff this administration.
Good.

It's good to pay your debts off. Bravo! What he's doing is working
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 07:25 PM
 
6,822 posts, read 6,634,329 times
Reputation: 3769
Quote:
Originally Posted by fibonacci View Post
And here I thought Trump was SUPPOSED to drain the swamp that was filled to the brim with special interest groups, yet the only thing Trump does while in office is kowtow to the demands of his big business friends. The FCC under this administration has now no longer required ISPs to provide basic information such as broadband prices, speeds, and fees.

Tell me exactly how this administration will create jobs if and when ISPs will start throttling websites that might be associated with a competitor, businesses can even figure out what type of speeds to expect for their broadband, and consumers could possibly get socked with hidden fees.
All you have to do is sit back and watch it get better.

There is no where but up from here. The results will speak for themselves. You will continue your consumer spending habits. You as well as everyone else posting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 07:38 PM
 
Location: Planet earth
3,617 posts, read 1,821,367 times
Reputation: 1258
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGMotorsport64 View Post
It's not good that the admin wants to undermine this right?

I'm glad you did some research, hopefully you'll join the right side of this fight.

You are correct. This is NOT a good thing Trump is doing. I'm willing to wager he had some of the same news sources I had on the issue, and what was claimed from my news sources several years ago is NOT in the text. Fortunately I am willing to admit when I am wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 08:23 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,563,173 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
Dude, I want to know if the OP knows what it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 09:33 PM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,958,439 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by KS_Referee View Post
You are correct. This is NOT a good thing Trump is doing. I'm willing to wager he had some of the same news sources I had on the issue, and what was claimed from my news sources several years ago is NOT in the text. Fortunately I am willing to admit when I am wrong.
I'd like to think the president has better sources than tabloid style news, but I'm not gonna get my hopes up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 10:09 PM
 
46,951 posts, read 25,984,404 times
Reputation: 29441
Quote:
Originally Posted by KS_Referee View Post
Net neutrality was simply a means for government to eventually control CONTENT on the internet. As usual, we can simply look around at the responses then determine which political party insists on being able to block differing opinions.

They (the left) hypocritically call themselves champions of free speech... as long as that speech agrees with their opinions and fits their narrative. All other speech must be content neutral because well... because that's free speech according to the left.


Edited to add: These statements above by me are NOT true. I finally quit being lazy on the issue and read the important part (to me) of the text. I was 100% wrong with what I said above in THIS post. My apologies.
MAD props on doing research, changing your mind and admitting it openly. I will endeavor to follow that example.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2017, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Twin Falls Idaho
4,996 posts, read 2,444,621 times
Reputation: 2540
Quote:
Originally Posted by KS_Referee View Post
I was wrong. I just read the 1st and 5th Amendment implications regarding net neutrality, and despite what I was told, the text appears to prohibit ANY limitation of free speech as the ISPs themselves will NOT be engaging in the speech as did cable providers who selected content and placed their own commentary on their network. ISPs will simply be a conduit for the free exchange of information.

There is a downloadable .pdf located right next to "FCC Record:" slightly down the page. This document is the TEXT of the FCC New Neutrality regulation.

https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-rel...internet-order

Constitutional considerations begin at paragraph 544 of the document.
Ongoing still:

FCC takes first step to repeal tough net neutrality rules - LA Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2017, 01:03 PM
 
7,447 posts, read 2,832,835 times
Reputation: 4922
A 1 is a 1 and a 0 is a 0, no such thing as special "1s" or special "0s" which is, at its core, the point of net neutrality.

Undermining it is not a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2017, 02:04 PM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,958,439 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzzSnorlax View Post
A 1 is a 1 and a 0 is a 0, no such thing as special "1s" or special "0s" which is, at its core, the point of net neutrality.

Undermining it is not a good thing.
But MAGA and the Muslim Kenyan?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top