Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't quite think the Dems want Christopher Steele under oath. Because he will be forced to answer who can ntrwcted hos services. And that's when we find out the Clinton campaign hired a foreign intelligence spy, who worked with the Kremlin, in efforts to undermine the current president of the United States. Clinton's vs MI-6, could get good.
That is exactly what I was thinking too.
It is the Clintons with ties into Russia.
I don't quite think the Dems want Christopher Steele under oath. Because he will be forced to answer who can ntrwcted hos services. And that's when we find out the Clinton campaign hired a foreign intelligence spy, who worked with the Kremlin, in efforts to undermine the current president of the United States. Clinton's vs MI-6, could get good.
Sigh. you don't even know who hired him do you? Heres a clue, it wasnt originally the Democrats. They got involved later.
Status:
"“If a thing loves, it is infinite.”"
(set 2 days ago)
Location: Great Britain
27,178 posts, read 13,461,836 times
Reputation: 19472
It states in the article that he is unlikely to attend, however there is the prospect of a meeting in a safe neutral place or in the UK itself and I am sure intelligence services will want to speak to Mr Steele.
I don't quite think the Dems want Christopher Steele under oath. Because he will be forced to answer who can ntrwcted hos services. And that's when we find out the Clinton campaign hired a foreign intelligence spy, who worked with the Kremlin, in efforts to undermine the current president of the United States. Clinton's vs MI-6, could get good.
Are you all right?
Steele turned over the blackmail dossier to the FBI last July.
Regardless, it was long before Trump took the oath of office or was even elected.
Why any American would want to be kept in the dark about the current POTUS being tangled up with the Kremlin is a mystery.
Okay, but isn't the investigations going on centering around Russia's involvement in influencing our election? Russia hacking Hillary associates happened long before she was elected president (and in fact never was).
How is collaborating with Russia / Wikileaks to release John Podesta emails different than Clinton campaign hiring a foreign spy to work with Kremlin in order to undermine Trump?
Sigh. you don't even know who hired him do you? Heres a clue, it wasnt originally the Democrats. They got involved later.
What does it matter who originally hired him? As you admitted yourself, Dems /Clinton hired Chris Steele / fusion GPS, who is a foreign spy that worked with Russia, in efforts to undermine Trump. If trump collaborated w russia to hack Hillary, I don't see this much different than Hillary hiring an MI6 agent to work w Russia to undermine Trump.
Sigh. you don't even know who hired him do you? Heres a clue, it wasnt originally the Democrats. They got involved later.
Yah. Looks like dude fleeced multiple entities selling this report. First he sold to republicans and then to democrats. Not sure if FBI and agencies again paid him or just got it free from McCain. This report was out in the open so long. They should actually force him for giving evidence. I want to see how many times people paid for same report and reliability.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
