Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This guy is your typical righty doofus on top of everything else. Look at the bill he proposed for state universities:
Quote:
Under the proposed bill, a job candidate who is seeking a position as a professor or instructor would not be hired if his or her political party affiliation on their hire date would “cause the percentage of the faculty belonging to one political party to exceed by ten percent the percentage of the faculty belonging to the other political party,” the text states.
If that guy really thought his in-house certificate was the same thing as a business degree - he's just too damn dumb to hold office.
And if he did know that that his in-house certificate isn't the same thing as a business degree - then he thinks his constituents are too damn dumb to know the difference.
If that guy really thought his in-house certificate was the same thing as a business degree - he's just too damn dumb to hold office.
And if he did know that that his in-house certificate isn't the same thing as a business degree - then he thinks his constituents are too damn dumb to know the difference.
Probably both. And I would guess that he's right about his constituents.
So...he used to manage a Sizzler? What is really sad...that's more management experience than Obama had when he took office. Not to mention, more than Hillary ever had.
If that guy really thought his in-house certificate was the same thing as a business degree - he's just too damn dumb to hold office.
And if he did know that that his in-house certificate isn't the same thing as a business degree - then he thinks his constituents are too damn dumb to know the difference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. In-Between
Probably both. And I would guess that he's right about his constituents.
This is proven by the fact that more of them voted for him, than the other candidates.
Probably both. And I would guess that he's right about his constituents.
Reading the article, he is just pretty complaisant about not having a college degree but representing himself as a college graduate...
Likely regards a college degree as pretty useless...
And likely his constituents won't give a flip that he scammed them (like Trump did his voters)...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
