Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The radio host was a prosecutor under Reagen in the AG office and he cited 8 sources proving wiretapping for over a year of Trump. The New York Times cited Obama Administration sources telling they were tapping Trump for a year as well.
Mark Levin was never a prosecutor for Reagan or anyone else. In the Reagan administration he served as Chief of Staff for Attorney General Edwin Meese. If he had any evidence of wiretapping, he should have met personally with Trump and conveyed that information directly to him, at which time Trump should have demanded that he be shown the FISA warrant.
But that didn't happen because Mark Levin is a hack journalist and has no interest in determining what the truth is in any matter, and because this is another self enforced error. Trump simply should not be left alone at night, he would do well to hire a nurse who could medicate him when he reaches for a phone or ipad.
I was responding specifically to a post about James Clapper, not Trump. You're more than welcome to reply to any post I've made about Trump always telling the truth: (disclosure - I've never made one stating so)
That's a tremendous stretch besides the fact that the Attorney General would need to sign off, I didn't hear that from Trump but as usual he is short on details. He's always a little short on details on his other lies like voter fraud and now we have a listening device in Sessions senate office, I can now include his campaign manager with those needing professional help.
First of all, Wapo and NYT are not extreme leftist. That's just dumb. They're the most well-regarded papers in the world, and NYT holds the record for Pulitzer prizes.
Aside from that, BBC, Reuters, and AP are generally considered the most neutral.
NYT reporter who won 3 pulitzer prizes claims Russians hacked our elections and it is equivalent of 9/11 and Perl Harbor. NYT printed so much stuff but yet to show us any proof. Wapoo who is spreading Russian hacking propaganda with fake power grid hacking story.
Mark Levin was never a prosecutor for Reagan or anyone else. In the Reagan administration he served as Chief of Staff for Attorney General Edwin Meese. If he had any evidence of wiretapping, he should have met personally with Trump and conveyed that information directly to him, at which time Trump should have demanded that he be shown the FISA warrant.
But that didn't happen because Mark Levin is a hack journalist and has no interest in determining what the truth is in any matter, and because this is another self enforced error. Trump simply should not be left alone at night, he would do well to hire a nurse who could medicate him when he reaches for a phone or ipad.
Meese left office in 1988, so that would have been the last time Levin would have been in even the same neighborhood as the inside track. The idea that he somehow has special info about the NSA or FBI under the Obama administration is simply silly.
That's a tremendous stretch besides the fact that the Attorney General would need to sign off, I didn't hear that from Trump but as usual he is short on details. He's always a little short on details on his other lies like voter fraud and now we have a listening device in Sessions senate office, I can now include his campaign manager with those needing professional help.
Trump is short on details. Obama can't order this. It has to be from DOJ. Bush AG knows this stuff and he explains about it. Anchor asks question about special investigation. He asks here where is the crime so far? We are discussing so much stuff. FBI is yet to name a crime.
You keep assuming that politics is/was the reason for the (so far) alleged wiretap.
Maybe it wasn't politics at all. Maybe it was a crime they were pursuing. For instance - and this is a guess on my part - illegal cash transfers.
If they found a crime, they have put forth zero evidence. It's been more than 8 months since their first FISA request. If there had been evidence of anything wrong, Obama would have handled it before Trump was inaugurated. Instead all they did was loosen the sharing rules so they could spread as much suspsiciom as possible.
We know Obama and the Dems would have done anything to keep Trump from becoming President, so clearly the wiretaps relvealed nothing.
The Obama admin spying on Trump actually proves two things- one that there are serious issues with our FISA court (and that Dems are completely fine using them to spy on political opponents), and two-that Trump did nothing wrong. He was being spied on by the federal government and they still couldn't find anything.
A few questions for you:
1. Which is it, FACT or OPINION? Or, is it a FACT that the U.S. Intelligence Agencies have an OPINION?
2. In exactly what way did Russia "interfere in the U.S. election"?
3. What was the net result (if any) of that interference?
4. What proof, if any, is there of that result?
Please, be specific.
The intelligence agencies indicated the Russians hacked into the DNC emails, did you not see them. We will never know what the end result is but their is no question that they attempted to get Trump elected. The only way to get an objective answer would be to do the election over.
If they found a crime, they have put forth zero evidence. It's been more than 8 months since their first FISA request. If there had been evidence of anything wrong, Obama would have handled it before Trump was inaugurated. Instead all they did was loosen the sharing rules so they could spread as much suspsiciom as possible.
We know Obama and the Dems would have done anything to keep Trump from becoming President, so clearly the wiretaps relvealed nothing.
There is zero evidence provided so far. FBI updated House committee about this on Friday. There was nothing there according to Republican guy and Democrats accuse FBI hiding information.
If they found a crime, they have put forth zero evidence. It's been more than 8 months since their first FISA request. If there had been evidence of anything wrong, Obama would have handled it before Trump was inaugurated. Instead all they did was loosen the sharing rules so they could spread as much suspsiciom as possible.
We know Obama and the Dems would have done anything to keep Trump from becoming President, so clearly the wiretaps relvealed nothing.
Just to remind you, the Benghazi investigation didn't stop until after the November election. Those hearings began more than 2 years earlier, including 11 hours of testimony and a fake announcement that more evidence had been found only days before the election. The investigation into Trump's ties to Russia hasn't even begun!
[url=http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/12/house-benghazi-committee-files-final-report-and-shuts-down/95336692/]House Benghazi committee files final report and shuts down[/url]
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
