Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sources of proof start with the Intel sources that the New York Times and other reporters quote as saying Trump was tapped. There were several other sources as well on the press (left wing side) and no other way that what Flynn was saying could be recorded legally through FISA.
The great news is every attempted or accepted FISA record remains sealed and available from the courts. No spooks are allowed to destroy them.
Like I said, between this and the Obama slush fund in the billions stolen from victims for left wing activists of his choice should make for lots of left-wing bed wetting and charges through the summer.
Smile!
well i guess you are just making stuff up , because you are not providing any links, quotes or in fact anything.
I guess you will need to pretend you are suddenly busy and have to run off..... Or you could wait 4 hours and reply when you think it is safe.
There are over 1630 posts, so I hope I'm not repeating what has already been written.
I just watched Fox and Friends online. Former CIA Director, General Michael Hayden, said that "Trump forgot he was President" since he decided to tweet what he had read on Breitbart instead of consulting the many available sources to confirm or deny these allegations. The quotes in italics are from General Hayden.
“Why didn’t he simply use the powers of the presidency to ask the acting director of national intelligence, the head of the FBI, to confirm or deny the story he apparently read from Breitbart the evening before?”
The 3 hosts kept trying to spin it around and accuse Obama of ordering surveillance on Trump, so he added,
"He wouldn't even be involved," Hayden said. "You stay way back from this because of the separation of powers."
"That authority was taken away from the President" (back in the 70s) he added.
Every time he said Obama couldn't have done this, they kept saying "but he could have...." and he had to correct them. They just couldn't accept his explanation.
Even when he was talking about what Trump might be able to do as an exception, they tried to twist his words and he corrected them by saying, "I'm talking about President Trump."
If you take literally what the president tweeted, the plumbing just doesn’t work that way,” he said. “It could not have happened the way the president said it.
So I guess "Just for a moment, he forgot he was President" is the best explanation he could offer, although I wish he just said, "He's unfit, clueless, and dangerous," but I was probably expecting too much from a Fox interview.
Sources of proof start with the Intel sources that the New York Times and other reporters quote as saying Trump was tapped. There were several other sources as well on the press (left wing side) and no other way that what Flynn was saying could be recorded legally through FISA.
The great news is every attempted or accepted FISA record remains sealed and available from the courts. No spooks are allowed to destroy them.
Like I said, between this and the Obama slush fund in the billions stolen from victims for left wing activists of his choice should make for lots of left-wing bed wetting and charges through the summer.
Smile!
The NY Times said no such thing, let's see all your other sources that said Trump was tapped.
Why would they need an FISA for Flynn, they weren't tapping his phone.
I mean hell, Trump used the NATIONAL ENQUIRER as a "legit" source when he said Ted Cruz's dad was part of something with Lee Harvey Oswald. The National Enquirer??? Seriously?
If anything, I'm still waiting on any confirmation on the whole Russian thing, since the left have yet to provide ZERO evidence of Russia working with Trump to get him in the White House. ZERO.
Let's end fake news talk radio blowhards lies and make them pay for it. Talk radio has poisoned this country with its lies and nonsense for too long.
how did mark levin lie about the wiretaps when he was reading from news reports about the issue? you can try to sue him, well obama can try, but the reality is that if there was false information given, then the source of the information is who should be sued, and that isnt levin. its your new york times and other left wing media.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Mark Levin Should Be Sued for Lying About Wiretaps
