Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-22-2017, 12:42 PM
 
8,501 posts, read 3,339,003 times
Reputation: 7025

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Retriever View Post
Like you, I don't know which of those possibilities is the worst, but I do consider it to be...extremely disturbing...that somebody with any of those likely behaviors is in command of The US military and that he has access to the nuclear launch codes.
Read a book by Michael Morell a while back that mentioned concern about Nixon's instability grew towards the end to the point where the military guy holding the nuclear football was instructed to immediately notify Haig and/or the Secretary of Defense (?) should Nixon "show interest."

Trump's not Nixon - no way he's that unstable but someone of his personality type could well become more unhinged as frustrations grow.

Here - I'm more than glad that Ivana Trump now has a WH office. I could care less about any Kushner policies - just keep him close. That kind of nepotism is more than fine!!!

 
Old 03-22-2017, 12:43 PM
 
5,731 posts, read 2,192,381 times
Reputation: 3877
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
NOT surveillance of Trump. Trump wasn't the target.
"Surveillance not related to Russia." Who was the target then genius? Maybe they were trying to take down kellyanne Conway??
 
Old 03-22-2017, 12:45 PM
 
8,501 posts, read 3,339,003 times
Reputation: 7025
You folks who love Trump's "skill" at deflection and praise him for doing so ...

Would you feel the same if he used that tactic to put us into a war primarily for that reason?
 
Old 03-22-2017, 12:47 PM
 
8,501 posts, read 3,339,003 times
Reputation: 7025
Duplicate post.
 
Old 03-22-2017, 12:48 PM
 
Location: On a Long Island in NY
7,800 posts, read 10,105,281 times
Reputation: 7366
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoradoOnMyMind View Post
"Surveillance not related to Russia." Who was the target then genius? Maybe they were trying to take down kellyanne Conway??
It means there are multiple investigations involving people on Trump's team.

Translation: your guy Trump is in deep doodoo.
 
Old 03-22-2017, 12:49 PM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,771,287 times
Reputation: 7020
So for all the Trump worshippers, Nunes confirmed with reporters that this does not support Trump's tweet allegations.

This was a legal surveillance of foreign agents, and not necessarily in Trump Tower. There was no actual wiretap of Trump Tower, and this was legal activity conducted by intelligence agencies, not by Obama.

So even Nunes denied your allegations that this supports Trump's claim.
 
Old 03-22-2017, 12:52 PM
 
10,747 posts, read 4,342,219 times
Reputation: 5824
Quote:
Originally Posted by EveryLady View Post
You folks who love Trump's "skill" at deflection and praise him for doing so ...

Would you feel the same if he used that tactic to put us into a war primarily for that reason?
Trump is the most patriotic American I've ever seen, so your post isn't possible.
 
Old 03-22-2017, 12:55 PM
 
10,747 posts, read 4,342,219 times
Reputation: 5824
10 year prison sentence for leaking classified material.
 
Old 03-22-2017, 01:04 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,660,467 times
Reputation: 7485
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitemsohard View Post
10 year prison sentence for leaking classified material.
Is that you, Donald? This is not twitter. You're in the wrong forum. Have KellyAnne give you back your cell phone.
 
Old 03-22-2017, 01:06 PM
 
5,731 posts, read 2,192,381 times
Reputation: 3877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
So for all the Trump worshippers, Nunes confirmed with reporters that this does not support Trump's tweet allegations.

This was a legal surveillance of foreign agents, and not necessarily in Trump Tower. There was no actual wiretap of Trump Tower, and this was legal activity conducted by intelligence agencies, not by Obama.

So even Nunes denied your allegations that this supports Trump's claim.
Bottom line, there was surveillance on trump and his associates after the election not involving Russia. He denied a physical wire tap which people don't even use anymore, it's all digital so that's a straw man. Wiretap = surveillance/monitoring
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top