Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The people who say "This is propaganda, I've visited Sweden and Europe and they aren't like that" is like somebody visiting only downtown Chicago, the miracle mile, and areas of the north side, and saying that Chicago's crime and poverty issues are a myth. YOU HAVENT BEEN TO THE PROBLEM AREAS if you think either of these things.
rubbish by buddy lives there for at least 15 years now.
He simply loves it there. Anyway point is Sweden is doing great they have the same issues other nations have, but there is no big immigrant problem there , but there is a small group of racists trying to pretend there is.
Look we get it, you love trump and thus feel you need to support his nonsense. But trump is done with this, outside of the alt right nobody is buying the nonsense you guys are selling.
I KNOW the alt right hate this government link, and attack it. But they hate it so much because it is proof they are making it up.
rubbish by buddy lives there for at least 15 years now.
He simply loves it there. Anyway point is Sweden is doing great they have the same issues other nations have, but there is no big immigrant problem there , but there is a small group of racists trying to pretend there is.
Look we get it, you love trump and thus feel you need to support his nonsense. But trump is done with this, outside of the alt right nobody is buying the nonsense you guys are selling.
I KNOW the alt right hate this government link, and attack it. But they hate it so much because it is proof they are making it up.
Look at the evidence already offered in the rest of the thread. Your repeated assertions don't constitute reality.
Your link has already been debunked in this thread.
Sweden is a homeland for a Nordic European tribe. Period.
You mean "outside of the American and European Right"? That's a lot of people.
The fact is that you have racist ethnic interests in assuring that other tribes are disenfranchised. You simply wield the term "racist" to describe anyone who counters your ethnic interests. This is what no one is "buying" anymore.
Look at the evidence already offered in the rest of the thread. Your repeated assertions don't constitute reality.
Your link has already been debunked in this thread.
Sweden is a homeland for a Nordic European tribe. Period.
You mean "outside of the American and European Right"? That's a lot of people.
The fact is that you have racist ethnic interests in assuring that other tribes are disenfranchised. You simply wield the term "racist" to describe anyone who counters your ethnic interests. This is what no one is "buying" anymore.
You can debunk and offer evidence ´til your face turn blue.
The link in evilcarts post is the truth, no matter what your nationalist blogs say.
You can debunk and offer evidence ´til your face turn blue.
The link in evilcarts post is the truth, no matter what your nationalist blogs say.
How debunking and evidence works, BigSwede, is that it means that the link is untrue. That's the nature of evidence.
The prior website quoted, the National Review, is not a nationalist blog.
In fact, they were the most vehemently anti-Trump conservative news outlet in the nation during the U.S. election season.
They were the home of the #NeverTrump movement, meaning that they were voting for Clinton, and were almost apoplectic in their opposition to Trump.
Their pedigree is that of one of the oldest conservative news outlets in the U.S. They also maintain a long running print periodical. Compared to them, almost everyone else is a blog.
Sorry to disappoint you. If they are willing to debunk the liberal Sweden narrative, which gives Trump's platform support, then they are perhaps the most credible news outlet in the U.S.A. that is commenting on the matter.
This is because no one else has gone against their primary political platform throughout any of these politics, to include the WaPo and the NYT who have much less credibility because of the widely held perspective that they will say anything to forward a liberal agenda.
Even people here, to include myself, and you liberals, pale in comparison in credibility due to our various political agendas.
Look at the evidence already offered in the rest of the thread. Your repeated assertions don't constitute reality.
Your link has already been debunked in this thread.
Sweden is a homeland for a Nordic European tribe. Period.
You mean "outside of the American and European Right"? That's a lot of people.
The fact is that you have racist ethnic interests in assuring that other tribes are disenfranchised. You simply wield the term "racist" to describe anyone who counters your ethnic interests. This is what no one is "buying" anymore.
look you give yourself away when you say """Sweden is a homeland for a Nordic European tribe. Period."""
that line alone is the proof that your agenda is all about racism. Nothing more nothing less.
i suggest you look up the word racist, your post is the very definition of racism.
And you have debunked nothing. You have ZERO data to back up your race hate.
You can debunk and offer evidence ´til your face turn blue.
The link in evilcarts post is the truth, no matter what your nationalist blogs say.
I literally posted primary source studies - IN SWEDISH - and your retort is to make a jab about "nationalist blogs"?
Typical. The regressive left has, and still does, show itself to be aligned with political Islam. It is, at the very least, an appeaser. It accuses all who warn of political Islam 'bigot', 'racist' - you name it. Just look at the responses on this thread.
look you give yourself away when you say """Sweden is a homeland for a Nordic European tribe. Period."""
that line alone is the proof that your agenda is all about racism. Nothing more nothing less.
i suggest you look up the word racist, your post is the very definition of racism.
And you have debunked nothing. You have ZERO data to back up your race hate.
That's actually not the definition of racist. But I hope you can at least recognize they have a culture that is far superior to 95% of other cultures on this planet (including I can admit those of my own ancestors), as it has managed to produce better outcomes for its people than 95% of other cultures.
Sweden absolutely IS the home of the indigenous Swedish people. Just as China is the home of the Chinese, and Angola the home of the Angolese. Each have a right to their own destiny and culture, and not to be hit with ONE WAY expectations of "accommodating" foreign beliefs and customs into their own - perfectly fine - existing culture on the altar of PC multiculturalism.
Interestingly, I imagine you're also the type of person that will prattle on about gentrification, colonialism and the like? Complain about POC being "pushed out" of certain areas, or having their culture erased? But, only when it's white people threatening the culture of a non-white population is it a problem, amirite? I am willing to bet 100% you have at one time or another derided a non-native American person as having "stolen" this land from its rightful (original) inhabitants, as well. Hypocrisy tends to be a currency of the left.
Cultural relativism is as dead and useless as your incessant chants of RACIST - RACISM - RACISTS, which appears to be your go-to argument (without any self-awareness of how increasingly, that charge has little to no effect on account of its overuse by people like you).
look you give yourself away when you say """Sweden is a homeland for a Nordic European tribe. Period."""
that line alone is the proof that your agenda is all about racism. Nothing more nothing less.
i suggest you look up the word racist, your post is the very definition of racism.
And you have debunked nothing. You have ZERO data to back up your race hate.
Sorry, there is nothing to give away. Your fake "investigation" falls flat.
Your agenda is about race hate. You hate the natives of that region, and wish to disenfranchise them from a homeland due to your own racial self-interest. Period.
You don't hold Jews, Africans, Asians, or anyone else to similar standards. Thus, your only agenda is hate of Europeans.
I don't care about your assertions of racism. It has exactly zero effect on me nor much of the world. It's pure manipulation in an attempt to shame others so that you gain politically, without opposition. Nothing more. Who cares about your cynical accusations. Stuff them.
What a laugh in regard to your supposed data, in your hate of native Swedes and Europeans. It's been debunked as intentionally hiding immigrant crime. Look at the past posts in this thread. Your link is to what is designated as "invalid" data, not that you have the education to be able to decipher statistical terminology.
How debunking and evidence works, BigSwede, is that it means that the link is untrue. That's the nature of evidence.
The prior website quoted, the National Review, is not a nationalist blog.
In fact, they were the most vehemently anti-Trump conservative news outlet in the nation during the U.S. election season.
They were the home of the #NeverTrump movement, meaning that they were voting for Clinton, and were almost apoplectic in their opposition to Trump.
Their pedigree is that of one of the oldest conservative news outlets in the U.S. They also maintain a long running print periodical. Compared to them, almost everyone else is a blog.
Those are the hard facts of the matter.
OH PLEASE!
The national review is a RACIST RAG! Buckley was a segregationist!
William F. Buckley jr is the man behind it, and they have been putting a racist spin on anything and everything they can for decades.
Your source , your proof is coming from a site that promotes race hate and will makeup whatever they need to support their desire for racial purity
You have openly stated your case as one of race. And your only "proof" that there is a problem in sweden comes from a publication noted as being racist for many decades and was run by a man whose racism is fully documented over the course of many many decades.
National review is racist publication and supports race based segregation.
What a joke. Marx would have been a racist in the eyes of DailyKos and MediaMatters. You can't seriously be holding these hack websites as being of the same standard of the National Review.
The information in the National Review articles that I posted is not invented information. The National Review is simply presenting publicly available and acknolwedged information in its articles.
Moreover, if we are assessing organizations based on their founders, the the Democrats are racists? Right?
The liberal media is consumed with the racial welfare of everyone except for Whites. Thus, it's racist. Shall we review the various statements of race hate from the constitutional Left in the last, oh I don't know, pick any period really. Five years, ten years, whatever.
Last, you still are in the mental rut thinking that calling someone "racist" is some kind of convincing political point. It's not. The time for shaming your opponents, for ethnic-racial political gain, is over.
Have anything else to add besides thinking that calling anyone a racist matters in the context of your attempts to sociopolitically and geopolitically disenfranchise them? No? Then have a nice day.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
