Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Maybe with his experience with executive orders, the presidency , expertise with constitutional law, and his dislike for Donald Trump, he helped craft the legislation to block the Donald's dumb Muslim ban law. Big deal he's a private citizen. Let face it the Donald's acumen has proven to be not much of a challenge for Judges and comedians alike.
Just another example of how so many people buy into every conspiracy theory out there - now Obama is some sort of "evil overlord who must fly to Hawaii to give orders to his minions."
Meanwhile, actual facts, such as Trump being a grossly unqualified moron who molests women and pays neither his taxes nor his employees, go ignored.
We've entered a "fact-free" era of politics, where the more true something is, the fewer people believe it because they are nuts enough to think "everything is a conspiracy" and they are "smarter than everyone else." Sad.
Wow, you claim such offense about conspiracy then go off on one yourself.
"Meanwhile, actual facts, such as Trump being a grossly unqualified moron who molests women and pays neither his taxes nor his employees, go ignored."
So what if he did stop and help the judge write up the rebuttal? He is a private citizen, a constitutional lawyer, and he has the sitting president making up stuff about him personally being a phone tapper and tweeting it. He no longer owes Trump any benefit of the doubt or respect. If, as a private citizen, he believes the ban is unconstitutional, there's not a darn thing wrong with him participating in the process.
Last edited by ChristineVA; 03-16-2017 at 03:35 PM..
So what if he did stop and help the judge write of the rebuttal? He is a private citizen, a constitutional lawyer, and he has the sitting president making up stuff about him personally being a phone tapper and tweeting it. He no longer owes Trump any benefit of the doubt or respect. If, as a private citizen, he believes the ban is unconstitutional, there's not a darn thing wrong with him participating in the process.
Thank you
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.