Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wow man! That's the longest answer to a question I never asked. You're not the "leader" of some sect are you? Congratulations though. You really put some miles on your keyboard. How about giving it a rest and drinking some green beer or something. I'll just google the answer instead.
I realize that IQ isn't the strong point of any liberal, and that liberal propaganda depends on superficial and incomplete information, but you should perhaps watch admitting as much in public.
Also, if you could have googled the answer, then why waste everyone's time, and space in the forum, in starting a thread?
You seem like you enjoy being anti-intellectual and posting troll threads, for which you admittedly don't need or want responses to.
Or was your response to me merely the OP trolling his own thread? Seems like an an obvious occasion for mod action to me.
The alt-right basically consists of those who would have voted for George Wallace in 1968.
Does that make the modern Left those who would have executed the Romanovs in 1918, who started the Gulag system that killed 66 million Russians, and who undertook the Chinese cultural Revolution that murdered 30 million Chinese?
Its plot is about an immigrant horde that invades a white homeland (France) to overthrow white civilization. This is very much in keeping with Bannon's philosophy and policy recommendations. If you think brown people are the enemy of white people, then you surely see a lot to like in Bannon.
So, let's be clear. When is a horde of anyone invading any land not worth defending against?
I realize that IQ isn't the strong point of any liberal, and that liberal propaganda depends on superficial and incomplete information, but you should perhaps watch admitting as much in public.
Also, if you could have googled the answer, then why waste everyone's time, and space in the forum, in starting a thread?
You seem like you enjoy being anti-intellectual and posting troll threads, for which you admittedly don't need or want responses to.
Or was your response to me merely the OP trolling his own thread? Seems like an an obvious occasion for mod action to me.
What do you think?
So you are participating with a verbose respone to a thread that you think is just a troll thread? How does that show this high IQ that you profess to know of?
I reread your wordy response to my question and I am still amazed at it. Your response involves, communism, neocons, liberals, the right, the old right, the 1960's, political economics, pornhub, youtube, twitter, the red scare, the murder of 66 million Russians and 30 million Chinese to name just a few! You can bloviate on about such things but you might want to add another word to your vocabulary. Concise.
The term "Alt-Right" (Alternative Right) was literally created by white supremacist Richard Spencer and his white nationalist think tank.
The alternative right comes out of paleoconservativism, a reaction to neoconservatism which began in the 1970s before Spencer was born. Spencer did not create the term and certainly does not define it.
The Left claims hegemony on social issues. That is, it holds that its view on social issues is inevitable "progress" founded in (an inconsistently applied and thus invalid) moral foundation.
Anyone who opposes liberals on their social issues is not just opposition, but inherently evil and thus an anathema.
And therefore any level of hatred for the opposition can be justifiably displayed. It's the same kind of mentality that is cultivated against the enemy in wartime and against infidels in extremist religious circles. And it's political use was well illustrated with Orwell's "two minutes hate" in 1984. Personally, I saw it for the first time at 16 years old when a church-related event I attended, showing a film featuring Anita Bryant, was crashed by a group of gay activists. The level of hatred displayed by those activists for Bryant, and even for me simply for being in attendance, made quite an impression.
The alternative right comes out of paleoconservativism, a reaction to neoconservatism which began in the 1970s before Spencer was born. Spencer did not create the term and certainly does not define it.
Alt-right are people who are not necessary against leftist policies but more of like against minorities. For example most Republicans would have no qualms with voting for John Kasich. The Alt-right would only vote for him if he was the republican candidate. They are like the most extreme SJW's except IMO their a lot bigger than the extreme SJW's. People who aren't the alt right include 90% of Republicans who have been in Washington/State government for more than 5 years. A huge percent of the newer younger Republican "leaders" are alt-right guys or agree with the alt-right more than other guys.
The best way of identifying an Alt-Right dude is...
Young or Young-ish
Not Religious
Believes Fox news is fake/stupid/leftist
Is a White Conservative (sorta of a given, but some extreme SJW's are white so who knows...)
Male
Now not everyone with these views are alt-right but a huge portion certainly are.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
