Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The interesting thing about Nixon is that he was a very experienced politician and a smart guy. Trump is neither of those but he does share one thing with Nixon - both are (or were) bat sh*t crazy and delusional. Nixon used his political wiliness to hide his perfidy. Trump has no such skill so his failings are visible to the entire world. Well, except for his cult who refuse to believe the obvious.
The "cult" you refer to currently is about 91% of Republicans according to Quinnipiac in a poll dated March 7th - so a pretty sizable "cult".
"Republicans approve 91 - 5 percent. Disapproval is 89 - 5 percent among Democrats and 52 - 41 percent among independent voters"
The "cult" you refer to currently is about 91% of Republicans according to Quinnipiac in a poll dated March 7th - so a pretty sizable "cult".
"Republicans approve 91 - 5 percent. Disapproval is 89 - 5 percent among Democrats and 52 - 41 percent among independent voters"
The FBI will find nothing of note, obviously. If they couldn't find Hillary Clinton's clear, indisputable intent to violate numerous federal recordkeeping laws, despite months of investigation, then they'll find no link between Trump or the GOP and the Podesta gaffe that caused the DNC server hack in the first place.
The only thing criminal here was John Podesta's stupidity in falling for the most mundane phishing scam imaginable, one that allowed some hackers to compromise DNC servers which were obviously less than secure in the first place. Whoever hacked the DNC didn't need the assistance of Trump or anybody else, except John Podesta, who willingly obliged, for reasons he has yet to adequately explain.
Left unexplained in all of this by our leftist friends, however, is why they believe Trump or anyone else is responsible for Podesta's imbecilic actions, which were the sole and proximate cause of the tampering with DNC computers, which apparently weren't all that secure to begin with.
New flash. Intelligence agencies confirmed that is was not somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds. It was the Russians.
So what has he covered up? Please provide the proof.
Waldo ,listen up I am going to school you .We don't have to ,the FBI,CIA,NSA does not have to show you a damn thing,nope ,nothing.They do however need to show Congress and other whose job it is.....to know.Not your job so nope no one owes you squat!
New flash. Intelligence agencies confirmed that is was not somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds. It was the Russians.
And here's a news flash for you, little pal: The FBI isn't going to find a link between the Trump campaign or any operative therefor and John Podesta's rank, inexcusable stupidity in falling for a phishing scam that a grade-school child knows how to avoid.
The reason the FBI won't find any link? Because there was none, obviously. The Trump campaign didn't need to do anything. John ("El Gran Imbecil") Podesta did the hackers' work for them.
The DNC's hacking problem is: 1) 100% attributable to the fecklessness and stupidity of their own personnel, and 2) the DNC's problem alone.
too late it has already been publicly presented....nobody here is bothered repeating the same links for you dozens of times, i and most everyone else is fine with you pretending not to understand. Your denying the sun does not stop it rising.
And here's a news flash for you, little pal: The FBI isn't going to find a link between the Trump campaign or any operative therefor and John Podesta's rank, inexcusable stupidity in falling for a phishing scam that a grade-school child knows how to avoid.
The reason the FBI won't find any link? Because there was none, obviously. The Trump campaign didn't need to do anything. John ("El Gran Imbecil") Podesta did the hackers' work for them.
The DNC's hacking problem is: 1) 100% attributable to the fecklessness and stupidity of their own personnel, and 2) the DNC's problem alone.
And that's all she wrote about that, Jack.
Do you have special access to what the FBI is investigating? Because they felt there was enough information to meet the bar to start an investigation. And it was not an overweight person in their bedroom. Them along with the The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC). So you know more than they do, Milty?
For Immediate Release
DHS Press Office
Contact: 202-282-8010
The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.
And here's a news flash for you, little pal: The FBI isn't going to find a link between the Trump campaign or any operative therefor and John Podesta's rank, inexcusable stupidity in falling for a phishing scam that a grade-school child knows how to avoid.
The reason the FBI won't find any link? Because there was none, obviously. The Trump campaign didn't need to do anything. John ("El Gran Imbecil") Podesta did the hackers' work for them.
The DNC's hacking problem is: 1) 100% attributable to the fecklessness and stupidity of their own personnel, and 2) the DNC's problem alone.
And that's all she wrote about that, Jack.
Stealing from a baby is still stealing--
If you don't understand that and apportion blame in that situation then you have a real ethics quandry...
Hackers don't work for free--despite Assange's credo--
You know those Russian hackers were paid for what they did---either in money/Bitcoin or in Russian patronage....
Quid pro quo could (in Trump's world) mean I will launder your dirty Russian rubles with a development deal and you help me do X, Y or Z
Trump has a history--documented in some court cases and depositions as well as other corroboration--that illuminate a very shady, corrupt connection to organized crime through his building development. He has other connections to money laundering with the Russians...and likely other types of corrupt enterprises with others in other countries...
Read some of the books about him that he thought would coat him in gold dust when he made the deal with the author and add to his luster--only to find out in the final product that it told a very different version of Trump---one much more truth based...
Trump is a sleaze and a crook...
And when people know how to research and have the power (and desire) to go where others might not have,
I believe there will be evidence that shows people in Trump's circle have been compromised by the Russians...
I think Trump--because he refuses to use a computer/email and depends on written documents (courier delivered according to Trump) that are much easier to destroy for lot of his negotiations and communications then it may be much more difficult to actually tie the can to his tail...
Flynn can be prosecuted on some serious charges for just what is known now
Manafort if he can be shown to have operated as a foreign agent within the US w/o proper documentation then
His goose is cooked
Lot more needs to be investigated
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
