Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
From here on out, until an independent investigator is appointed by congress, it's all just a republican cover up.
Follow the money, will lead right to the truth. That means tax returns. An independent investigator can subpoena those returns. Until that happens, we're all just peeing into a hurricane.
The process takes time. But we need to go through it. There can be no question of any shortcuts or backroom deals.
Fingers crossed that our Constitution holds. Probably depends on if enough people stand behind her.
there many issues and behind the scenes information we never will hear. Sara Carter seems to have track on this. No Names yet, but remember the only people who can authorize wiretapping/ and or a Fiser warrant is the President /FBI/NSA Leadership.
As mention before the Obama Administration with the help of Bill and Hillary destroy people lives.
That's what I thought. You know what some folks are saying. You actually have no idea whether they are talking through their hats or not.
And absolutely NO ONE has said that either of the Clintons was involved in whatever it is that is going on. Not Trump, not Nunes, not Comey...
There is not going to be a special prosecutor for fake news conspiracy theories peddled by DNC hacks and their allies in the media,
There will be a DOJ investigation of the Obama regime, which there should be, and indictments of Democrats will follow.
You're dreaming.
I know you would like this to happen but, sadly, the evidence is piling up that your dreams will not be coming true.
While there are several Congressional hearings and and FBI/NSA investigations into the Trump-Russia connection, the DOJ has made no mention of any plans to investigate the "Obama regime" and bring indictments against the Democrats. Could always happen I guess.
For the moment, it seems have their hands full what with the travel ban, the Trump-Russia business, handling all the ongoing prosecutions... all while short-staffed.
You're really pushing this left wing stuff. Seems you are 'disseminating it widely' as the article urges people to do.
It's no surprise.
The AlterNet is identified by Wikipedia as a Progressive activist site. OK, see the track we're on here?
The rest of it pretty much tells us all we really need to know -- which was already obvious from reading this highly biased story, and which I'm surprised anyone would want to be seen as so strongly endorsing.
"AlterNet publishes original content and also makes use of "alternative media", sourcing columns from Salon, The Guardian, Consortiumnews, Truthdig, Truthout, TomDispatch, The Washington Spectator, Al Jazeera English, Center for Public Integrity, Democracy Now!, Waging Nonviolence, Asia Times, New America Media and Mother Jones. The editorial staff is headed by founder and executive editor Don Hazen, a former publisher of Mother Jones.
You're really pushing this left wing stuff. Seems you are 'disseminating it widely' as the article urges people to do.
It's no surprise.
The AlterNet is identified by Wikipedia as a Progressive activist site. OK, see the track we're on here?
The rest of it pretty much tells us all we really need to know -- which was already obvious from reading this highly biased story, and which I'm surprised anyone would want to be seen as so strongly endorsing.
"AlterNet publishes original content and also makes use of "alternative media", sourcing columns from Salon, The Guardian, Consortiumnews, Truthdig, Truthout, TomDispatch, The Washington Spectator, Al Jazeera English, Center for Public Integrity, Democracy Now!, Waging Nonviolence, Asia Times, New America Media and Mother Jones. The editorial staff is headed by founder and executive editor Don Hazen, a former publisher of Mother Jones.
That's what I thought. You know what some folks are saying. You actually have no idea whether they are talking through their hats or not.
And absolutely NO ONE has said that either of the Clintons was involved in whatever it is that is going on. Not Trump, not Nunes, not Comey...
We will have to see. It's like we work for any of these agencies, we are just merely civilians. The indications however based on the information (If we can believe that too) that there is senior leadership involved at the top levels of the Obama Gov.
What drives me to the Clinton connection is the faithful day Mr. Clinton met AG Lynch here in Phx sky Harbor. Plus the information provide to Clinton in which has been forgotten by many.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/u...n-hacking.html
Mar 1, 2017 - Obama administration officials scrambled to ensure intelligence of ... officials scrambled to spread information about Russian efforts to undermine the .... goal of the campaign was to help tip the election in Mr. Trump's favor.
One result of CD forums this is debated on both sides. This is good and if there wrong doing it will not be forgotten.
I keep a wait and see attitude on these things. But I'm not wrong about the unmasking of the names of Americans and then those names were widely disseminated within the IC. It did happen. And it's illegal.
Folks are going to accuse others of being totally wrong on all sorts of stuff regardless ... but just noticed this thread started with confusion leading to apples and oranges type discussions.
The OP never provided a link in the first post on 22 March for this thread/sticky. OP almost certainly was talking about Nunes; but without a link the second poster was immediately confused saying her brief comment and the thread title was old news - thinking the reference was to the Russian surveillance question (addressed in your March 15 article).
The first thread link came from hitemsohard in post #16 - the Nunes' charges made on 22 March with the trip to the WH.
THAT issue is indirectly related to the Russian investigations - and there's no other major thread (???) right now on those investigations and both involve FISAs so it's inevitable the two will be merged with interlocking posts.
Maybe it helps to say that some are arguing that the Nunes charges on March 22 (again, when this thread began) were an effort to distract or derail possible findings in the Russian investigations (and the Trump tweets). And that the details and motivations for any Obama Administration actions could be quite different between the two issues (one, the Nunes charges about non-Russian "surveillance" during the transition, and, two, the longer-term Russian "surveillance" questions).
For example, the Obama administration has been pretty upfront that it DID move to preserve evidence about possible Russian interference in the election with Republicans at the House Intel Hearing on March 20 concerned about the Flynn leak. That's a different issue from whether or not they were generally "spying" on the Trump transition team outside of the Russian concern.
Helps ... does not help ...
Last edited by EveryLady; 03-25-2017 at 04:31 PM..
Personally, I believe this entire thread belongs in the "Politics & Other Controversies" Forum.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
