Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It would be nice to see what you're talking about. Without it, we have nothing to believe you.
Your cred here, has been diminished in the short time you have been here. Do something to gain it back.
But a pdf on document sharing site linked by a blog it's enough proof going the other way?
Riddle me this why didn't he sent that info to WikiLeaks or any news organization?
This thread could be related to the following: Potential Smoking Gun
Quote:
Classified intelligence showing incidental collection of Trump team communications, purportedly seen by committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and described by him in vague terms at a bombshell Wednesday afternoon news conference, came from multiple sources, Capitol Hill sources told Fox News. The intelligence corroborated information about surveillance of the Trump team that was known to Nunes, sources said, even before President Trump accused his predecessor of having wiretappedhim in a series of now-infamous tweets posted on March 4.
The intelligence is said to leave no doubt the Obama administration, in its closing days, was using the cover of legitimate surveillance on foreign targets to spy on President-elect Trump, according to sources.
Because Nunes’s intelligence came from multiple sources during a span of several weeks, and he has not shared the actual materials with his committee colleagues, he will be the only member of the panel in a position to know whether the NSA has turned over some or all of the intelligence he is citing. However, Fox News was told Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., had been briefed on the basic contents of the intelligence described by Nunes.
But a pdf on document sharing site linked by a blog it's enough proof going the other way?
Riddle me this why didn't he sent that info to WikiLeaks or any news organization?
Until otherwise, it is the only evidence presented.
Lets gooooo! This is getting more exciting by the minute. Trump vs dems and deep state. Hope the conservatives have the stomach for the fight, dems want war (it's all they can offer at this point)
DING DING DING
They are the schoolyard bully who just got his ass kicked. They have nothing left but to play the smallest violin in the world; Nobody can hear it anymore.
For those liberals who still have critical thinking skills: Why did Obama make the sharing of covert data open across the board just a few days before he was out?
Why didn't he do it in the previous 8 years, if it was so important?
A 2010 Playboy Magazine investigation called Montgomery "The man who conned the Pentagon", saying he won millions in federal contracts for his supposed terrorist-exposing intelligence software.[2] The software was later reported to have been an elaborate "hoax" and Montgomery's former lawyer Michael J. Flynn called him a "con artist" and "habitual liar engaged in fraud".[3]National Public Radio reported, "For several months starting in the fall of 2003, Montgomery's analysis led directly to national code orange security alerts and cancelled flights. The only problem: he was making it all up."
Wonder if that is why Nunes went directly to President Trump yesterday.....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trump is 100% Vindicated---
