Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There doesn't seem to be any credible evidence to back up this claim. In fact this is some very shoddy journalism. I would expect such reporting from CNN, but FOX generally does a little better.
Does that theory work only when it's swarthy skinned people being killed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91
There doesn't seem to be any credible evidence to back up this claim. In fact this is some very shoddy journalism. I would expect such reporting from CNN, but FOX generally does a little better.
You've gotta be kidding me!
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960
True or not, I hardly expect no collateral damage in eradicating the 21st century NAZI-like ISIS. But it must be done.
By whom? And if you say the US, why? ISIS is over there. Not here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp
They kill a handful, let's start a war. We kill hundreds, so what.
It's really difficult to take the war mongers seriously any longer. It's too bad that the repercussions of doing that is so much death, destruction and waste.
I'm generalizing here as it's not something you can blanket all on but it seems so many that argue we need to waste trillions killing people that did nothing to us also argue we can't afford to help those who need medical treatment here.
It's obvious where their loyalty lies.
You said it far better than I ever could.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960
Killing the targets addresses it, but like any airstrike, collateral damage happens.
What target? For all you know, they didn't manage to kill a single member of ISIS.
No, I'm not kidding. The article was poorly written, and completely lacked any credible evidence, I would have sworn it was written by CNN, WaPo, or the NYT.
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine
Oh, we are at war? I practically forgot over the last 8 years. I hope the report is false. Poor Iraq.
There seems to be a lack of reporting by msm about all the deaths caused the Obama administration.
It's kind of like how all the anti-war protests stopped as soon as Obama get into office.
No, I'm not kidding. The article was poorly written, and completely lacked any credible evidence, I would have sworn it was written by CNN, WaPo, or the NYT.
There seems to be a lack of reporting by msm about all the deaths caused the Obama administration.
It's kind of like how all the anti-war protests stopped as soon as Obama get into office.
There's nothing wrong with the story. You just don't want these things brought to light.
Isis and Al Qaeda surrounds themselves with sympathetic "civilians" to kill civilians everywhere else, ISIS and Al Qaeda are all scum and need to be decimated. Were people opposed to all the drone strikes by obama?
"There were ten times more air strikes in the covert war on terror during President Barack Obama’s presidency than under his predecessor, George W. Bush.
Obama embraced the US drone programme, overseeing more strikes in his first year than Bush carried out during his entire presidency. A total of 563 strikes, largely by drones, targeted Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen during Obama’s two terms, compared to 57 strikes under Bush."
Great Britain, France, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Australia, Germany, the Netherlands, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Canada are all part of the "US led coallition" fighting ISIS, so why do you say "they are over there, not over here" when it could have been any one of these countries?
Fox News did not say who launched the air strike, they simply said "US led coallition".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
