Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-27-2017, 03:23 PM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,961,631 times
Reputation: 6059

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
That makes no sense. There are a limited number of classes of eligible adults, and the under $40,000 income cutoff is for a household of 3. Just give it up already. Those of you who are dragging this out are really making yourselves look foolish.
Why is it so hard to for you to realize that if you earn more than $3000 per year in Texas, you dont get Medicaid?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-27-2017, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,465,032 times
Reputation: 8599
Quote:
Originally Posted by MongooseHugger
If government healthcare is so great, why is the VA such a mess?
One is health insurance and the other is health care. Better to compare with Medicare and Medicaid than with the VA, but the issues with all are mainly budget.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 03:25 PM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,471,648 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by MongooseHugger View Post
If government healthcare is so great, why is the VA such a mess?
The VA has a problem that other systems like Medicare don't have. And that problem is gov't ownership of the actual HC delivery facility. We need to keep the HC delivery in private hands.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 03:26 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13711
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Nope. The employer part of the insurance premium is paid for by the family through lower wages. If the employer pays 80% of the insurance premium that is in fact you who pay for it. Replacing that with an employer payroll tax simply means the employer pays a payroll tax instead of an 80% insurance premium.
Actually, both are deductible business expenses, and both are paid for by the employees via lower wages.

When employers consider the expense of each employee, whatever benefits, taxes, etc., they have to pay as a result of that employment is netted against the employer's budget for employing that employee. Any additional cost necessarily lowers the employee's wages. Doesn't matter how you parcel it, it's coming out of what that employee could have been paid.

Naturally, that will most negatively impact low-wage employees as the percentage of the employment costs in relation to what their employment is worth will be much larger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 03:40 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,759,995 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
One is health insurance and the other is health care. Better to compare with Medicare and Medicaid than with the VA, but the issues with all are mainly budget.
Not exactly. The VA is a good model of the UK NHS. Government ownership of all of it, all employees on the govt. payroll.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 03:44 PM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,922,570 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katarina Witt View Post
Not exactly. The VA is a good model of the UK NHS. Government ownership of all of it, all employees on the govt. payroll.
Except that not all NHS staff are on the government payroll. Quite a lot of UK doctors are private contractors.

In the US there is an increasing trend for hospital doctors to be salaried employees of the hospital. Mayo operates that way and our local healthcare system has just gone that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 03:49 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by MongooseHugger View Post
If government healthcare is so great, why is the VA such a mess?
Because we refuse to hold incompetent politicians responsible for dealing with the incompetence, waste,fraud and corruption.

I discussed this earlier today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 03:50 PM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,961,631 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Actually, both are deductible business expenses, and both are paid for by the employees via lower wages.

When employers consider the expense of each employee, whatever benefits, taxes, etc., they have to pay as a result of that employment is netted against the employer's budget for employing that employee. Any additional cost necessarily lowers the employee's wages. Doesn't matter how you parcel it, it's coming out of what that employee could have been paid.

Naturally, that will most negatively impact low-wage employees as the percentage of the employment costs in relation to what their employment is worth will be much larger.
Whether the employer pays a payroll tax or whether the employer pays an insurance premium, it is deceptive to say that only the payroll tax lowers the wages for the employee. Some cheeky experts on the right like to claim that an employer payroll tax means you will pay that amount in extra taxes, while ignoring that the employer simply replaces the insurance premium with a payroll tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 03:54 PM
 
20,955 posts, read 8,674,856 times
Reputation: 14050
In the end the numbers would not increase at all.
It's just that we'd have to pay them!

As it stands now we pretend things are OK but the government pays 2/3 of health care ALL from the Federal Debt and Deficits. So we are cheating our children and future generations and actually paying more (predatory capitalist health care cost more)......than it would to have an enlightened universal coverage.

It wouldn't matter much what the setup was.....deductibles, etc - it all ends up getting paid out anyway and private companies will work (fraud) the system no matter what unless the penalties are high.

Heck, Rick Scotts Health care corp. defrauded the government out of billions and he was rewarded for it! Maybe if we steal billions we will get appointed to high political office, eh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 03:57 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13711
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Whether the employer pays a payroll tax or whether the employer pays an insurance premium, it is deceptive to say that only the payroll tax lowers the wages for the employee.
I didn't say that. I very clearly said BOTH lower employees' wages:
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Actually, both are deductible business expenses, and both are paid for by the employees via lower wages.

When employers consider the expense of each employee, whatever benefits, taxes, etc., they have to pay as a result of that employment is netted against the employer's budget for employing that employee. Any additional cost necessarily lowers the employee's wages. Doesn't matter how you parcel it, it's coming out of what that employee could have been paid.

Naturally, that will most negatively impact low-wage employees as the percentage of the employment costs in relation to what their employment is worth will be much larger.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Some cheeky experts on the right like to claim that an employer payroll tax means you will pay that amount in extra taxes, while ignoring that the employer simply replaces the insurance premium with a payroll tax.
Either one comes out of the employee's pocket, not the employer's. That's the important thing to remember.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top