Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-27-2017, 07:26 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
5,281 posts, read 6,585,656 times
Reputation: 4405

Advertisements

I've come to the conclusion that I hate the idea of "protection". The promise and desire to be protected has always been the means by which tyranny could spread. And it's not just SJW protection, it's all protection. In my opinion, and it's simply my opinion, protection seems to be a lost cause. I think we're better off abandoning the idea that the government should protect us, than trying to find ways to somehow justify the legitimacy of government.

I am not an anarchist, but I do think all protection services by the state and federal governments should definitely be left up to the market. I feel that if someone feels they need to be protected, they should pay for it. Just how it's not anyone's burden to feed you, clothe you, or pay for your college. It is also no someone else's burden to make sure you feel protected. If you feel you should be protected, then come out of your own pocket. But again, just my opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-27-2017, 07:53 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
In bondage to your Master.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 07:57 AM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,551,388 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by branh0913 View Post
I've come to the conclusion that I hate the idea of "protection". The promise and desire to be protected has always been the means by which tyranny could spread. And it's not just SJW protection, it's all protection. In my opinion, and it's simply my opinion, protection seems to be a lost cause. I think we're better off abandoning the idea that the government should protect us, than trying to find ways to somehow justify the legitimacy of government.

I am not an anarchist, but I do think all protection services by the state and federal governments should definitely be left up to the market. I feel that if someone feels they need to be protected, they should pay for it. Just how it's not anyone's burden to feed you, clothe you, or pay for your college. It is also no someone else's burden to make sure you feel protected. If you feel you should be protected, then come out of your own pocket. But again, just my opinion.
So then I don't want to hear any complaints about letting terrorists into the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Born & Raised DC > Carolinas > Seattle > Denver
9,338 posts, read 7,106,572 times
Reputation: 9487
Private security for the entire country? Is this real life???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 07:59 AM
 
1,825 posts, read 1,418,879 times
Reputation: 2345
Quote:
Originally Posted by branh0913 View Post
I've come to the conclusion that I hate the idea of "protection". The promise and desire to be protected has always been the means by which tyranny could spread. And it's not just SJW protection, it's all protection. In my opinion, and it's simply my opinion, protection seems to be a lost cause. I think we're better off abandoning the idea that the government should protect us, than trying to find ways to somehow justify the legitimacy of government.

I am not an anarchist, but I do think all protection services by the state and federal governments should definitely be left up to the market. I feel that if someone feels they need to be protected, they should pay for it. Just how it's not anyone's burden to feed you, clothe you, or pay for your college. It is also no someone else's burden to make sure you feel protected. If you feel you should be protected, then come out of your own pocket. But again, just my opinion.
So then you think it's okay to have open borders and let terrorists in. I am by no ones a conservative, but essentially you are saying this is okay.

This thread topic is ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 08:05 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
5,281 posts, read 6,585,656 times
Reputation: 4405
Quote:
Originally Posted by frimpter928 View Post
So then you think it's okay to have open borders and let terrorists in. I am by no ones a conservative, but essentially you are saying this is okay.

This thread topic is ridiculous.
Let them in. I guarantee they would lose. You have a nation of 300 million people all armed. I don't see them getting all that far. The idea that a handful of radical terrorist somehow a threat to a nation full of technologist, best athletes, best fighters, best marks men, and has the most guns per capita than ANYWHERE in the world is a threat is a stretch. And people almost never question this assumption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Here and now.
11,904 posts, read 5,582,296 times
Reputation: 12963
Quote:
Originally Posted by branh0913 View Post
I've come to the conclusion that I hate the idea of "protection". The promise and desire to be protected has always been the means by which tyranny could spread. And it's not just SJW protection, it's all protection. In my opinion, and it's simply my opinion, protection seems to be a lost cause. I think we're better off abandoning the idea that the government should protect us, than trying to find ways to somehow justify the legitimacy of government.

I am not an anarchist, but I do think all protection services by the state and federal governments should definitely be left up to the market. I feel that if someone feels they need to be protected, they should pay for it. Just how it's not anyone's burden to feed you, clothe you, or pay for your college. It is also no someone else's burden to make sure you feel protected. If you feel you should be protected, then come out of your own pocket. But again, just my opinion.
You do realize that NO protection means no publicly funded military, police, or fire departments, right? Take that argument to its logical conclusion, and we may as well not have any government at all, just a bunch of individuals with private gangs protecting their estates, and constant warfare between these small factions; in essence a return to feudalism.

Nice going.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 08:09 AM
 
Location: Born & Raised DC > Carolinas > Seattle > Denver
9,338 posts, read 7,106,572 times
Reputation: 9487
Quote:
Originally Posted by branh0913 View Post
Let them in. I guarantee they would lose. You have a nation of 300 million people all armed. I don't see them getting all that far. The idea that a handful of radical terrorist somehow a threat to a nation full of technologist, best athletes, best fighters, best marks men, and has the most guns per capita than ANYWHERE in the world is a threat is a stretch. And people almost never question this assumption.



Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,587,616 times
Reputation: 9169
Yeah, no. I don't want Blackwater replacing taxpayer funded police. Especially since this means only rich people would get police protection. Hello, neofeudalism
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 08:12 AM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,724,250 times
Reputation: 6407
Quote:
Originally Posted by skins_fan82 View Post
Private security for the entire country? Is this real life???

Google the movie "Soylent Green". Only the wealthy could afford to have the police investigate crimes against them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top