Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-02-2017, 02:44 PM
 
983 posts, read 738,030 times
Reputation: 1595

Advertisements

https://www.buzzfeed.com/azeenghoray...DE2#.gtX1Nk0Xb

Quote:
So when it came to choosing public faces for the march, the organizers were struggling to figure out how not to screw up again.

“I love Bill Nye,” said Stephani Page, a biophysicist at University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, who created the Twitter hashtag #BlackAndSTEM. Page was asked to join the march’s board in February after she tweeted criticism of its approach to diversity. “But I do feel comfortable saying to you what I said to the steering committee: He is a white male, and in that way he does represent the status quo of science, of what it is to be a scientist.”
Adding Hanna-Attisha and Villa-Komaroff, she said, “was an opportunity to put up a picture of science that did not just fit the white male image.”
SJWs trying to "diversify" science will kill it faster than Trump's wildest dreams.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-02-2017, 02:49 PM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,072,175 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marleinie View Post
"Hanna-Attisha and Villa-Komaroff, she said, “was an opportunity to put up a picture of science that did not just fit the white male image.
They're trying to increase diversity in the field of science, which has traditionally been dominated by white males.

Oh, the horror!

What's the matter, OP? Did you run out of things to pseudo-offended by?

You do know that Bill Nye will also be there as a headliner, along with these two women, right?

http://www.geekwire.com/2017/march-f...hanna-attisha/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2017, 02:50 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,218,061 times
Reputation: 12102
Just so laughable.

Any intelligent person with a smattering of common sense should see the rampant lunacy in this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2017, 02:53 PM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,618,587 times
Reputation: 21097
Ahh.

Person can't lead the March of Science due to skin color.

This isn't "scientific".
viz.
  • March of Science /= Science Organization
  • March of Science = a Political Organization.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2017, 02:56 PM
 
45,220 posts, read 26,431,296 times
Reputation: 24974
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
They're trying to increase diversity in the field of science, which has traditionally been dominated by white males.

Oh, the horror!

What's the matter, OP? Did you run out of things to pseudo-offended by?

You do know that Bill Nye will also be there as a headliner, along with these two women, right?

March for Science spotlights Bill Nye and two awesome science women
So science is about everyone looking the same?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2017, 02:59 PM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,072,175 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
So science is about everyone looking the same?
Science has traditionally been a difficult field for women to break into. What's wrong with highlighting a few successful female scientists, alongside the male ones, at a rally entitled the March for Science?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2017, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,633 posts, read 18,214,590 times
Reputation: 34502
Keep it classy, Dims. Such an approach (and others like it, which seem to have become the order of the day for you guys) will ensure continued decreasing success with white working class voters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2017, 03:15 PM
 
4,851 posts, read 2,283,349 times
Reputation: 1588
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
Science has traditionally been a difficult field for women to break into. What's wrong with highlighting a few successful female scientists, alongside the male ones, at a rally entitled the March for Science?

There is nothing at all wrong with highlighting women and minority contributions to science, and emphasizing them to gain more of the same. There is , however, something wrong with science becoming political to the point where a white male (much if not most of the First World's scientists ) cannot be allowed to be the face of an event because he is, ....well, ....a white male.

And this is not said from any bias. I dont know the women mentioned, but I love NDGT , and the vibe and energy he brings to science.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2017, 03:16 PM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,072,175 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
Keep it classy, Dims. Such an approach (and others like it, which seem to have become the order of the day for you guys) will ensure continued decreasing success with white working class voters.
You are aware that women are more than 50 percent of the population, right? How horrible to show women in science. It will make all those insecure men angry, as seems to be the reaction in this thread.

Again, to soothe your injured psyche, there will be plenty of white men there as well, and Bill Nye is still one of the headliners. He's just not the ONLY headliner.

I know, I know, it's appalling that he will have to share the stage with a few women of science. But never fear, men still dominate the field and probably will for a decade or more to come. Which is kind of the point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2017, 03:21 PM
 
4,851 posts, read 2,283,349 times
Reputation: 1588
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
You are aware that women are more than 50 percent of the population, right? How horrible to show women in science. It will make all those poor insecure men angry, as seems to be the reaction in this thread.

Again, to soothe your injured little psyche, there will be plenty of white men there as well, and Bill Nye is still one of the headliners. He's just not the ONLY headliner.

I know, I know, it's appalling that he will have to share the stage with a few women of science. But never fear, men still dominate the field and probably will for a decade or more to come.

It's hilarious how threatened white males seem to be by smart women.
Be honest now. I dont think anyone feels threatened by smart women. it is simply being pointed out that naming Bill Nye as the headliner, then changing that in the face of PCness and complaints from PC folks about the fact that he is a white male are stupid.

its not about them selecting women or minorities. its about the decision to move away from Bill Nye simply because he is a white male.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top