Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-09-2017, 08:58 AM
 
19,717 posts, read 10,107,310 times
Reputation: 13074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
No, actually it makes no sense at all. Of course unless you support the gassing of women and children?

I guess Trump could've followed the Obama doctrine and sent a strongly worded stern letter about some imaginary "red line"...
Instead, Trump warned them in advance about the bombing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2017, 09:00 AM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,457,152 times
Reputation: 8599
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty
Ahh so you accuse the Rebels that were armed and funded by Obama, Hillary, Rice & Kerry, of using Chemical Weapons. Is that the case?
There are two competing rebel forces in this district - ISIS and Al Qaeda linked. Neither supported by the last Administration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 09:01 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 26,996,167 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
White House Admits That Syria Missile Strike Was A Meaningless Publicity Stunt

"Senior administration official: Strike should not be interpreted as beginning of wider campaign to weaken or remove Assad.

In typical Trump fashion, the missile strike was a big showy empty gesture that was intended to get the president some good press.
You realize the article you quote as "news" is actually ALL opinion right? Does any military action have to be about removing Assad? Can't it just be about a warning to Assad to stop using WMD's (that are internationally outlawed) against his own people aka innocent women and children?

Why does targeted and limited military force have to be about regime change or a broadening of our involvement? It doesn't...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 09:02 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,766,724 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
No, actually it makes no sense at all. Of course unless you support the gassing of women and children?

I guess Trump could've followed the Obama doctrine and sent a strongly worded stern letter about some imaginary "red line"...
Obama requested authority to use force in Syria. Republicans in Congress told him no and threatened to impeach him. The lack of action in Syria is the fault of Republicans, not Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,457,152 times
Reputation: 8599
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj
No, actually it makes no sense at all. Of course unless you support the gassing of women and children?

I guess Trump could've followed the Obama doctrine and sent a strongly worded stern letter about some imaginary "red line"...
In 2013 Obama backed off as there was no proof or link from the alleged chemical attack to Assad.
In 2017 Trump pulled a Leerrroyyy Jeeeeenkins! and charged in without waiting for evidence or proof.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 09:07 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 26,996,167 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohawkx View Post
Exactly. It was military action with no policy to back it up. A very dangerous situation.
Trump should look at Bush 2 and the Iraqi incursion. That was another military action with no policy to back it up.
How'd that work out?
Well, there wasn't supposed to be any WMD's in Syria to begin with. I mean, according to Obama and Rice (as recently as this January) those were all removed long ago.
How can Obama and Susan Rice's most ardent supporters measure what they've said against what we now know to be true (that they still retain WMD's and have all along) and still defend them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 09:08 AM
 
51,651 posts, read 25,785,636 times
Reputation: 37884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Obama requested authority to use force in Syria. Republicans in Congress told him no and threatened to impeach him. The lack of action in Syria is the fault of Republicans, not Obama.
Exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 09:10 AM
 
51,651 posts, read 25,785,636 times
Reputation: 37884
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
Well, there wasn't supposed to be any WMD's in Syria to begin with. I mean, according to Obama and Rice (as recently as this January) those were all removed long ago.
How can Obama and Susan Rice's most ardent supporters measure what they've said against what we now know to be true (that they still retain WMD's and have all along) and still defend them?
We don't know if they retained them, made them, or got them from Russia.

What the **** difference does it make now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 09:11 AM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,457,152 times
Reputation: 8599
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj
You realize the article you quote as "news" is actually ALL opinion right? Does any military action have to be about removing Assad? Can't it just be about a warning to Assad to stop using WMD's (that are internationally outlawed) against his own people aka innocent women and children?
There is no proof or evidence of what outlawed chemical was used or by whom - but that didn't stop fake facts Trump from charging in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 09:13 AM
 
52,433 posts, read 26,600,078 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
There are two competing rebel forces in this district - ISIS and Al Qaeda linked. Neither supported by the last Administration.
Ahh. So you are stating that in Syria there is Assad and 3 different sets of rebels fighting each other. It gets more & more complicated as you try to explain why it wasn't Assad. LOL

Must feel strange for you to be allying yourself with the Syrian dictator & Putin. But then again it's all that Trump's detractors have left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top