Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-13-2017, 07:15 PM
 
4,851 posts, read 2,282,175 times
Reputation: 1588

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
The airlines have every right to overbook. It is in their business plan, and the government can butt out.


However, arriving at a solution to an overbooking is the airline's problem, and the solution is NOT what happened here. United will pay dearly for their stupidity.

The solution to overbooking is a no refund policy on your tickets unless they sell them to someone else. Cant make your trip? Notify the airline to put your tickets back up for sale. If they do resell them, you get a refund. If not, no refund . The plane is full in terms of payed seats ( if it sold out ), and no excuse for overbooking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2017, 07:17 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,335,750 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by misskittytalks View Post
Fine, then I'll bow out of the discussion, as I thought the issue was whether or not they have the full force of law behind them and the authority to "act as police would, with the resources of police, and to be obeyed as one is expected to respond to being given a police directive". Carry on then...
Do not misunderstand. I have no idea what Illinois law is...so I too am flying blind. However in a world I controlled the most highly trained and capable Police would be working in the air ports. One hopes Chicago understands the danger and the damage that could result from "Security Guards" in O'hare. Be like Las Vegas hiring security guards for the Strip. We could...but we would regret it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2017, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Austin
15,626 posts, read 10,380,316 times
Reputation: 19510
Is this "man forcibly removed from an overbooked flight" a convicted felon? The press has reported he is a convicted felon.

I don't want anyone thinking they can disobeying airline staff. I don't side with this rude passenger in any way based on what I have read.

Last edited by texan2yankee; 04-13-2017 at 08:14 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2017, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,335,750 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallflash View Post
The solution to overbooking is a no refund policy on your tickets unless they sell them to someone else. Cant make your trip? Notify the airline to put your tickets back up for sale. If they do resell them, you get a refund. If not, no refund . The plane is full in terms of payed seats ( if it sold out ), and no excuse for overbooking.
Tricky stuff. I would guess that over 5 or 6 million miles I flew on the initially planned ticket 20% of the time or less. On some occasions I would change the itinerary multiple times a day. I once did a NY to CA to London to Holland to NYC to NY in 72 hours with I think 9 or 10 different changes. End up losing my luggage as you would expect. This was truthfully damn the cost travel...not up to being able to charter a plane but up to that. But it is why you want to get to avoid getting too clever about hard itineraries. Some of us make a living on the birds and we need to be able to move things around as the events flow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2017, 07:38 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,434,576 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
It is complicated Blondy. I would not bet either way. A cost regulatory trade off that may have union rules as well. Clearly if they had offered a sufficient price they could have gotten the volunteers. Get up to $5,000 and it would tempt me who would never volunteer for an overnight bump. And no they are not restricted to $1350. That is simply the most they must offer for 400% of the fare. They can offer anything they want above that.
Well that's something we will never know. You can say everyone has their price, but this was a pretty small flight......around 70 passengers I think. Take out the block of high school kids and their chaperone. Add in the length of time until the next flight they could take. Seemed to also be quite a few families with kids who probably wouldn't see hanging around a hotel/airport or taking kids out of school for that long as desirable. Pretty rapidly dwindling pool of people to volunteer.

Clearly they should have tried harder by raising the offer and if they didn't have the authority to do that gotten on the phone to a manager who did. They could have also made a personal plea to the passengers for someone to take the doctors place. Of course, he could have done the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2017, 07:41 PM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,957,018 times
Reputation: 3070
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
The airlines have every right to overbook. It is in their business plan, and the government can butt out.


However, arriving at a solution to an overbooking is the airline's problem, and the solution is NOT what happened here. United will pay dearly for their stupidity.
This airline forfeited that right for the government to butt out when they called in airport security funded by tax dollars. They love purchasing politicians, they love writing regulations to crush their competition, they can therefore not cry foul when same said government crushes them.

Don't like it, throw the lobbyists out of DC

i also support consumers fighting back against them. It is the Capitalist Way
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2017, 08:13 PM
 
283 posts, read 198,502 times
Reputation: 553
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Millions in China are viewing the video with disgust.

Wonder how this will impact ticket sales on United's China routes.
Disgusting is understated. It doesn't matter what race the man is, it is outrageous. It could happen to anyone. Apparently, United has a track record of treating passengers like ****. The man should sue and sue big. Make this a warning to other airliners worldwide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2017, 09:21 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,434,576 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by texan2yankee View Post
Is this "man forcibly removed from an overbooked flight" a convicted felon? The press has reported he is a convicted felon.

I don't want anyone thinking they can disobeying airline staff. I don't side with this rude passenger in any way based on what I have read.
His lawyer seemed to confirm that in the press conference he held today.

I'm paraphrasing, but he said something like.....Yes, He's 69 years old and has had some bumps in the road.

He went on to say, and again, I'm paraphrasing, that according to the law it was not relevant or not the story due to the remoteness in time. As well as in a jury trial, jury would be instructed to disregard that info.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2017, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,851,639 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
His lawyer seemed to confirm that in the press conference he held today.

I'm paraphrasing, but he said something like.....Yes, He's 69 years old and has had some bumps in the road.

He went on to say, and again, I'm paraphrasing, that according to the law it was not relevant or not the story due to the remoteness in time. As well as in a jury trial, jury would be instructed to disregard that info.
It's still funny though. Almost as funny as saying selling narcotics for sex is a "bump" in the road.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2017, 10:24 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,879,874 times
Reputation: 11259
While I agree he should sue I think about 50K is more than enough. I suspect he will get more. He won the lotto and ended up with just a few bruises.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top