Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Of coarse we have the long tested common crimes of: theft, swindle, physical harm, and destruction of property, threats and murder. That is what we have the courts for.
Forcing anyone against their will to do what you say, will bring massive resentment and hate, every time.
I need help picking me out of that group. Any suggestions?
How would I know? Besides, at least you're somewhat rational & reasonable, have a sense of humor about stuff, have substantially decreased in drama queenery, & so on, in other words, more or less likable with an explanation.
How would I know? Besides, at least you're somewhat rational & reasonable, have a sense of humor about stuff, have substantially decreased in drama queenery, & so on, in other words, more or less likable with an explanation.
My drama queenery ebbs and flows. The State issues me brainwashing pills to be like you folks. Sometimes I take them. Sometimes I don't.
The only label on that chart I at least somewhat fit is Caveat Emptor (though I haven't had a hot dog since I was a kid).
Were the earliest designers of the Country men? Were they fallible? Did they make mistakes?
By calling them 'pragmatic anarchists' I meant only that they were attempting to form a better form of goverrment, the focus being on the pragmatic part. I don't think they were Gods, I don't think they saw themselves as such.
"I am certainly not an advocate for frequent and untried changes in laws and constitutions, I think moderate imperfections had better be borne with; because, when once known, we accommodate ourselves to them and find practical means of correcting their ill effects. But I know, also, that laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths disclosed, and manners and opinions change with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also, and keep pace with the times."
"We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy, as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
Hard to guess why you are repeating this question I thought first to simply ignore for a couple of reasons.
Are you asking why Congress passed the Judiciary Act of 1891?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Besides, at least you're somewhat rational & reasonable, have a sense of humor about stuff, have substantially decreased in drama queenery, & so on, in other words, more or less likable with an explanation. 
Kudos to your loved ones! How do they cope? 
