Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The UK has very strict libel laws, and in the 1950s another newspaper there, the Daily Mirror, lost a libel suit to Liberace because they said he was gay.
Still an interesting insight into the Trump thought process, no?
Agree it's interesting, particularly when considering how he apparently thinks bringing his fraudulent & litigious business model to the White House is a legit standard operating procedure.
The Daily Mail is a conservative nut job newspaper. See for yourself https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mail/ If this is where you get all of your news, it explains a lot.
Most reasonable people, both democrats and conservatives, knew that Melania was never an escort. Just like most reasonable people know that Hillary Clinton was never involved in a child sex ring.
But there are dumb people out there who will believe anything.
Good. Not a fan of Trump but they are going after his apparently pretty non-political wife.
Yup. I view her as the real life incarnation of the movie "Pretty Woman". Not because there's any proof that she's was a sex-worker, but because she had a goal to make herself desireable, and she scored a "big fish".
From what I've read, she wants to make stopping cyberbullying her cause as First Lady:
Wow, I posted this on April 14th, and just noticed today that the second video (the one showing Melania's embarrassment about admitting she didn't want Trump's business number) has been censored. Back on the 14th, it only had a few thousand views. Wonder who pressured the Youtube police to have it removed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by upgrader
Yup. I view her as the real life incarnation of the movie "Pretty Woman". Not because there's any proof that she's was a sex-worker, but because she had a goal to make herself desireable, and she scored a "big fish".
From what I've read, she wants to make stopping cyberbullying her cause as First Lady:
If it was based on a lie, she should win. Then again I don't know why American supermarket rags aren't hit with the same lawsuits when they fabricate stories...
Status:
"Before saving for a rainy evening, see your xenial lawyer!"
(set 7 hours ago)
19,688 posts, read 652,124 times
Reputation: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty
The Daily Mail has been forced to apologize to Melania Trump for calling her a ***** (prostitute). They also admitted they never had any proof of those allegations. That smear was parroted here by some as fact.
They also have to pay out several million in damages.
Status:
"Before saving for a rainy evening, see your xenial lawyer!"
(set 7 hours ago)
19,688 posts, read 652,124 times
Reputation: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill
All outlets are reporting the settlement of 2.9 million.
Not the 150 she was looking for but we know it wasn't about the money.
Funny how some will assume 2.9 million means guilt here but O'Reilly's 19 million is just to get rid of a nuisance issue.
The faster things get back to "Business as usual" the better.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.