Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-14-2017, 08:16 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,181,556 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
The president has the authority to levy taxes. So tax all wire transfers to Mexico.
It's not at all difficult to send money orders or cash. Send a money order to some bank in the Caymen's and you can avoid taxes just like the big boys.

They aren't going to allow Trump to crack down on this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-14-2017, 08:18 AM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,217,006 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
It's not at all difficult to send money orders or cash.
True. Mexican postal workers will steal it. Why Western Union is better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2017, 08:19 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,739,477 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
By taxing remittances going to Mexico.
Yes, that seems to be the most popular proposal.

Where is the law that authorizes it? AFAIK, all laws instituting taxes must arise from the House. Is there an existing law which already authorizes taxing private remittances?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2017, 08:20 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,324,704 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
The wall can be paid by taxing remittances to Mexico such Western Union wire transfers or bank transfers.
BS. Wouldn't come to nearly enough to pay for it. Aside from that, why would you POSSIBLY think Mexico wouldn't RETALIATE by doing things like buying their massive corn supplies from South America instead of heartland U.S.A.? What would Trump do - put tariffs on Mexican goods? That would just force AMERICANS to pay for the wall through higher prices on imports.
One way or another AMERICANS would pay for the wall.


Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2017, 08:25 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,324,704 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
It's not at all difficult to send money orders or cash. Send a money order to some bank in the Caymen's and you can avoid taxes just like the big boys.

They aren't going to allow Trump to crack down on this.
Yup. As soon as Trump started taxing wire transfers to Mexico all kinds of outfits would pop up providing "go between" services through say, the U.K. or Canada or China, or Singapore......

There would be no way to keep the money from going through such services via a "third party" country and then on to Mexico. It would be a prime example of financial "free enterprise" at it's finest - financial services firms popping up to fill the needs of their customers. No way to stop it - and anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2017, 08:26 AM
 
Location: Pixley
3,519 posts, read 2,821,266 times
Reputation: 1863
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
The president has the authority to levy taxes. So tax all wire transfers to Mexico.
No, the president only has limited ability to levy taxes and they would not cover wire transfers to Mexico.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2017, 08:33 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,324,704 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
The president has the authority to levy taxes. So tax all wire transfers to Mexico.
So you don't think people are smart enough to go through an intermediary country instead?
Really?
REALLY?

Hey, financial free enterprise. Tax transfers to Mexico and that money will go through somewhere else instead.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2017, 08:34 AM
 
62,889 posts, read 29,114,800 times
Reputation: 18569
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimChi2PG View Post
What programs could be trimmed that would give us the money to do both? You could cut defense spending and social security and that might cover infrastructure and the wall but I don't think many would be happy about that. And they won't be happy about paying additional fees for Mexican made products.

We don't NEED the wall. We do need to rebuild the infrastructure. Let's focus on what will benefit ALL Americans and just chalk up the wall as as a luxury we simply can't afford.

It doesn't have to be defense spending or SS. Why would you just mention those two? There are several areas where the fat can be trimmed or eliminated.


No matter what the costs of the wall it would still be cheaper than spending $113 billion a year on illegal aliens. I get so tired of repeating the same facts all the time including the links proving that the wall does work. I feel like I am debating with those who seem to have cement between their ears. Again, there is no reason that we can't build the wall and still rebuild our infrastructures and other necessary things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2017, 08:35 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,807,239 times
Reputation: 10789
How about if Trump opens a "boarder wall fund?" All those in favor of the wall and want it built can donate to this fund.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2017, 08:36 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,324,704 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
It doesn't have to be defense spending or SS. Why would you just mention those two? There are several areas where the fat can be trimmed or eliminated.


No matter what the costs of the wall it would still be cheaper than spending $113 billion a year on illegal aliens. I get so tired of repeating the same facts all the time including the links proving that the wall does work. I feel like I am debating with those who seem to have cement between their ears. Again, there is no reason that we can't build the wall and still rebuild our infrastructures and other necessary things.
EVERYONE coming into office says they're going to "trim the fat" - WHEN has it EVER HAPPENED?

IT NEVER HAPPENS - and it NEVER WILL - for many many reasons.
Get a clue!


Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top