Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-19-2017, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,337,355 times
Reputation: 7979

Advertisements

There's the next generation of Democrats. Truth is racist and free speech needs to be suppressed. From California, where else.

Daily Wire

Quote:
the students explain that free speech has been "appropriated by hegemonic institutions" and should ultimately be curtailed because "it has given those who seek to perpetuate systems of domination a platform to project their bigotry."
Quote:
Historically, white supremacy has venerated the idea of objectivity, and wielded a dichotomy of ‘subjectivity vs. objectivity’ as a means of silencing oppressed peoples. The idea that there is a single truth–’the Truth’–is a construct of the Euro-West that is deeply rooted in the Enlightenment, which was a movement that also described Black and Brown people as both subhuman and impervious to pain. This construction is a myth and white supremacy, imperialism, colonization, capitalism, and the United States of America are all of its progeny. The idea that the truth is an entity for which we must search, in matters that endanger our abilities to exist in open spaces, is an attempt to silence oppressed peoples.
I'm sure they're getting great value for their indoctrination, I mean "education".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-19-2017, 06:10 PM
 
3,105 posts, read 3,815,758 times
Reputation: 4066
Some serious word salad there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2017, 07:07 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,820,452 times
Reputation: 11259
They have the right to express their ignorant opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2017, 07:15 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,147,690 times
Reputation: 12100
My question is, why aren't they studying their chosen field?

It seems they have way too much time on their hands to dream up nonsensical garbage such as the drivel they are spouting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2017, 07:15 PM
 
Location: Land of Thought and Flow
8,323 posts, read 15,136,207 times
Reputation: 4957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado^ View Post
Some serious word salad there.
Not really.

But I'll break it down for you:

The first quote, in full, reads:

Quote:
Free speech, a right many freedom movements have fought for, has recently become a tool appropriated by hegemonic institutions. It has not just empowered students from marginalized backgrounds to voice their qualms and criticize aspects of the institution, but it has given those who seek to perpetuate systems of domination a platform to project their bigotry.
Which, without all the big, fancy words? tl;dr - Freedom of speech is a double-edged sword.

The second one:

Quote:
Your statement contains unnuanced views surrounding the academy and a belief in searching for some venerated truth. Historically, white supremacy has venerated the idea of objectivity, and wielded a dichotomy of ‘subjectivity vs. objectivity’ as a means of silencing oppressed peoples. The idea that there is a single truth--’the Truth’--is a construct of the Euro-West that is deeply rooted in the Enlightenment, which was a movement that also described Black and Brown people as both subhuman and impervious to pain. This construction is a myth and white supremacy, imperialism, colonization, capitalism, and the United States of America are all of its progeny. The idea that the truth is an entity for which we must search, in matters that endanger our abilities to exist in open spaces, is an attempt to silence oppressed peoples.
tl;dr - Saying that the school is founded on "the discovery of truth" implies that there is only one "real" objective truth. The rest of the paragraph documents the historic use of how touting a subjective fact as an objective truth has been used to justify and propagate discrimination.

You can read the entire document here.

While I disagree with students getting to decide who is and isn't allowed a voice, I also disagree with administrators admonishing legal protests. If a protest blocks access to a building, but is still within legal limits, then it's legal and should be protected. I very much agreed with their statement that "Protest that doesn’t disrupt the status quo is benign and doesn’t function to overthrow systems of oppression, which is the ultimate goal."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2017, 07:25 PM
 
Location: Heart of the desert lands
3,978 posts, read 1,974,896 times
Reputation: 5219
Communications From Elsewhere
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2017, 07:25 PM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,718,380 times
Reputation: 10006
Here's the whole letter:


https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...PgBzz10wk/edit


It's an interesting window on what kids are learning these days, in this case black college kids who have apparently taken a few race and gender studies courses from professors who are fans of postmodernism. Somehow I don't think the whole "objective truth is a Euro-construct" thing is going to catch on as a rallying cry for the masses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2017, 07:35 PM
 
Location: Land of Thought and Flow
8,323 posts, read 15,136,207 times
Reputation: 4957
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Enlightenment View Post
It's an interesting window on what kids are learning these days, in this case black college kids who have apparently taken a few race and gender studies courses from professors who are fans of postmodernism. Somehow I don't think the whole "objective truth is a Euro-construct" thing is going to catch on as a rallying cry for the masses.
It correlates with the idea that "history is written by the victor" and how one's own biases affect how a story is told. Hence the idea of arguing against an "objective truth" in matters of politics. For instance, if you compare how America teaches the Revolutionary War against how it is taught in England, there are quite a number of differences. Even in America, there is still arguments from different sides on what the Civil War was "really" about.

And while their wording goes a bit above the reading level of the average American, they're not wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2017, 07:39 PM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,718,380 times
Reputation: 10006
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallowsCalibrator View Post
The rest of the paragraph documents the historic use of how touting a subjective fact as an objective truth has been used to justify and propagate discrimination.
Nah, they're saying there is no such thing as objective truth, that it's just something made up by the bad white men who gave us the Enlightenment and the modern world.
Quote:
I very much agreed with their statement that "Protest that doesn’t disrupt the status quo is benign and doesn’t function to overthrow systems of oppression, which is the ultimate goal."
When students come to see the search for objective truth itself as part of a system of oppression which must be disrupted and overthrown they have made themselves unteachable and it is better for everyone if they simply do not attend university.

Last edited by The Dark Enlightenment; 04-19-2017 at 07:49 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2017, 07:47 PM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,718,380 times
Reputation: 10006
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallowsCalibrator View Post
It correlates with the idea that "history is written by the victor" and how one's own biases affect how a story is told. Hence the idea of arguing against an "objective truth" in matters of politics. For instance, if you compare how America teaches the Revolutionary War against how it is taught in England, there are quite a number of differences. Even in America, there is still arguments from different sides on what the Civil War was "really" about.

And while their wording goes a bit above the reading level of the average American, they're not wrong.
If there's no objective truth, how would you know?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top