Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-20-2017, 11:39 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,095,846 times
Reputation: 6842

Advertisements

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/3...-at-home-wives
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-20-2017, 11:43 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,223 posts, read 27,592,812 times
Reputation: 16060
Another generalization
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2017, 11:49 PM
 
32,060 posts, read 15,055,077 times
Reputation: 13678
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
This isn't the 50's anymore. And I know very few millennials who are married. And if they are they are smart enough to know that both incomes are needed to afford housing these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 12:06 AM
 
27,131 posts, read 15,310,658 times
Reputation: 12068
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
This isn't the 50's anymore. And I know very few millennials who are married. And if they are they are smart enough to know that both incomes are needed to afford housing these days.


I guess so. According to the Census 1/3 of millennials live at home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 12:14 AM
 
32,060 posts, read 15,055,077 times
Reputation: 13678
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke View Post
I guess so. According to the Census 1/3 of millennials live at home.
So what. Why do so many republicans care so much about this. The jobs just aren't there depending on what you want to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 12:16 AM
 
Location: 89434
6,658 posts, read 4,745,895 times
Reputation: 4838
I prefer stay at home wives/moms because someone has to take care of the kids while one parent has to work. These days, child care costs are through the roof and you have to worry about a nanny/babysitter being one of those Casey Anthony types.

Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
And if they are they are smart enough to know that both incomes are needed to afford housing these days.
Some places have a high cost of living and if you miss a pay check, you'd end up homeless. Whereas some places you can have a decent lifestyle with only one income earner. The other parent can work part time if they want.

Just don't live in commiefornia where they take huge chunks of money for taxes and housing prices are insanely high. For 2k/month in commiefornia, you can barely get a dumpy studio apartment with a view of an alley. But in Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Texas you can get a luxury suburban home away from the ghetto filled with drugs, crime, gangs, illegals and trash.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 12:18 AM
 
3,615 posts, read 2,329,485 times
Reputation: 2239
I understand that desire as it was the way I was brought up and its nice to have but increasingly harder to do for some younger people. I was just reading an article that was talking about how so many millennial women were worried they make more money than millennial men, over 1/3 of millennial men are still living at home with their parents!

So much of medicare and baby boomer aging is dependent on younger people and taxes going into the system to support it. Millennials are not making the kind of money baby boomers did at that age

The average millennial worker makes less than the average baby boomer did in 1975

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.58b648731a54

Millennial women worry about out-earning boyfriends and husbands

"In 2015, , 38 percent of American wives made more money than their husbands"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 12:20 AM
 
32,060 posts, read 15,055,077 times
Reputation: 13678
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevdawgg View Post
I prefer stay at home wives/moms because someone has to take care of the kids while one parent has to work. These days, child care costs are through the roof and you have to worry about a nanny/babysitter being one of those Casey Anthony types.



Some places have a high cost of living and if you miss a pay check, you'd end up homeless. Whereas some places you can have a decent lifestyle with only one income earner. The other parent can work part time if they want.

Just don't live in commiefornia where they take huge chunks of money for taxes and housing prices are insanely high. For 2k/month in commiefornia, you can barely get a dumpy studio apartment with a view of an alley. But in Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Texas you can get a luxury suburban home away from the ghetto filled with drugs, crime, gangs, illegals and trash.
If you want a job in politics or the teck field that means DC or Cali. And both are extremely expensive areas to live in
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 12:21 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
241 posts, read 359,986 times
Reputation: 394
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
This isn't the 50's anymore. And I know very few millennials who are married. And if they are they are smart enough to know that both incomes are needed to afford housing these days.
30% of married mothers are full time stay at home moms. Of the remaining 70% that do work, over half work only work part time. One income households aren't as rare or as difficult to achieve as most people make them out to be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 12:24 AM
 
Location: 89434
6,658 posts, read 4,745,895 times
Reputation: 4838
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
If you want a job in politics or the teck field that means DC or Cali. And both are extremely expensive areas to live in
I'd rather pick either Arizona or Texas, both hardcore red states that aren't disappointing like commiefornia. Leaning towards Texas because there's no state income tax, which is a huge plus in my book (because taxation is theft).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top