Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
After every Islamic terrorist attack in a Western country, whether it's England, France, the U.S., Germany, etc., the various officials become quite obsessed with finding out where and when the Islamic fundamentalists became "radicalized". It seems to be a legitimate line of inquiry, if we can find out where they changed from normal, reasonable people to the kid that attak, assault, and destroy.
But we also need to look at radicalized American Democrat thugs and criminals. Islamic fundamentalists aren't the only ones we need to look into. How about the people who riot, smash stores, and burn cars right in Washington DC during the Presidential inaugurations? How about the ones who run wild through college campuses and towns, attacking police, throwing things through shop windows, throwing firebombs etc. when a conservative speaker is scheduled to give a speech? What of those who go to Republican Town Halls (never Democrat) solely for the purpose of harassing and shouting down lawmakers who went there to hear their constituents, answer their questions, and explain what they are doing?
These radicalized Democrats' actions don't differ significantly from the Islamic terrorists. They may differ in degree - the Democrat thugs haven't killed anybody yet - but not in tactics, purpose, or radical ideology. They all intend to intimidate, attack, shut down, and destroy the people they disagree with.
When/where did the American Democrats who do this, get radicalized? Who persuaded them? How long will they go on acting like terrorists themselves?
trying to conflate protesters with radicalized terrorists.
Thats kinda messed up.
The fact that the comparison between them is so close, is what is "kinda messed up". Only it's not "kinda".
I can understand why Democrats hate the comparison so much. Mostly because they can't refute it. So they call names of the people pointing out the similarity instead. They have nothing else.
The fact that the comparison between them is so close, is what is "kinda messed up". Only it's not "kinda".
I can understand why Democrats hate the comparison so much. Mostly because they can't refute it. So they call names of the people pointing out the similarity instead. They have nothing else.
You do know the Pinkerton men who were hired by Homestead steel, ford, the mines, etc. were hIGHLY PAID and shot many a man (and some women) in cold blood.
The miners and strikers were generally workmen and women. They gave us things like child labor laws, overtime pay, weekends off, safter working conditions and better wages.
It sounds like you are against these things - and social security, medicare, integration of the armed forces, civil rights and many of the great accomplishments of the last century.
In fact, as you well know, a Democratic POTUS and Congress declared, controlled and won WWII.
I hope you learn some history.......of course, I could mention the scandal riddent admins of Republicans but since we still live inside thm, it's hardly needed.
Liberals are taught to hate Conservatives by their university professors and have become a group of Fascists bent on destroying first the 1st Amendment rights of Conservatives, after that I expect they will go after their property and freedom of movement and then the Final Solution. You can look at it as they are a religion formed to hate and destroy Conservatives.
Liberals are taught to hate Conservatives by their university professors and have become a group of Fascists bent on destroying first the 1st Amendment rights of Conservatives, after that I expect they will go after their property and freedom of movement and then the Final Solution. You can look at it as they are a religion formed to hate and destroy Conservatives.
None of my professors discussed politics to be honest.
As expected, most of the liberals have no reply except to hastily change the subject to unrelated subjects. "Oh, look over there, REPUBLICANS!!!"
Back to the subject of the OP:
Decades ago, Democrats found they could malign and slime a Republican with no consequences to themselves. And they have been doing it ever since, to every Republican president. But at least they didn't cause riots, set fires, etc.
Now they have become radicalized extremists, acting similarly to radicalized Islamic terrorists: Attacking people, burning cars on the street, invading campaign events just to disrupt and shout down the speakers, destroying entire city blocks every time they become unhappy. What changed in the last several years to make them think this was acceptable? How much longer will it be before someone dies at their hands? And then the next death, and the next?
As expected, most of the liberals have no reply except to hastily change the subject to unrelated subjects. "Oh, look over there, REPUBLICANS!!!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1
When did conservatism turn into science denial and alternative facts?
See? There goes another one.
These people are completely incapable of addressing the facts. All they can do is twist and dodge.
Back to the subject of the OP:
Part of the Democrats' radicalization, is their newfound insistence that they won't accept the results of an election, or even pay the slightest respect to the Constitution of the U.S.
"But Hillary won the popular vote!"
"Off the pigs!"
"You can't say your opinion here!"
...all part of the New Left, the radicalized Democrats to whom the American Way is as foreign to them as Sharia Law is to normal Americans.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.