Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Its well known and well documented that republicans are more generous than democrats when it comes to charity or donating to those in need. Al gore and Joe Biden have been particularly stingy when it comes to giving their rich income to those that need.
This really baffles me. We have loads and loads of rich liberals including Warren Buffett, Tim Cook, Bill Gates, Emma Stone, Patricia Arquette, Meryl Streep etc. etc. etc.
Why don't they just pool their money together and create a fund to pay for all their liberal ideas such as health care, refugees, illegal immigrants, equal pay etc. etc. etc.?
Wouldn't that solve more problems than all the bickering?
Solving the problem is the last thing they want to do....they want to see the problem get bigger so they can offer some crumbs for votes.
And it's thread topics like this one that's not going to solve any problems either. It's a very divisive topic from the jump. All you are doing is putting them vs us , or us vs them, just another way for conservatives and liberals to attack each other. We already live in a pretty bitterly divisive country, where people can be pretty nasty to each other. I don't see where topics like this really add anything, except getting people going back and forth at each other.
How so? Pool your money together voluntarily and fund whatever and whom ever you want. How does that divide anybody?
What divides us is forcing people to do what you want and taking people's money to pay for your compassion at gubpoint.
Why?
Americans are, in large part, less in need of being saved.
So clueless these types of posts
If "liberals", whatever the hell a liberal is, want tax money to pay for a program, then liberal's tax money is going to the program. They are pooling their money and they are putting their money where their mouths are.
This really baffles me. We have loads and loads of rich liberals including Warren Buffett, Tim Cook, Bill Gates, Emma Stone, Patricia Arquette, Meryl Streep etc. etc. etc.
Why don't they just pool their money together and create a fund to pay for all their liberal ideas such as health care, refugees, illegal immigrants, equal pay etc. etc. etc.?
Wouldn't that solve more problems than all the bickering?
It's not my analysis and additional Fed Gov cost projection. It's that of the Urban Institute, a liberal think tank.
No. It's your interpretation of what you think they said, that they didn't actually say.
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
Quote:
Originally Posted by Your Link
The increase in federal spending is so large because the federal government would absorb a substantial amount of current spending by state and local governments, employers, and households.
It's been pointed out to you multiple times in the other thread.
As you, I believe said, you can fool people who aren't smart enough to understand, you may have even fooled yourself.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.