Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Can Trump nominate a new, impartial FBI director to investigate him now?
Yes 79 29.81%
No 186 70.19%
Voters: 265. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-15-2017, 03:18 AM
 
51,651 posts, read 25,785,636 times
Reputation: 37884

Advertisements

Blaming Democrats for not running a better candidate is just plain stupid.

Republicans ran Trump and the great majority of them still believe he's a fine choice.

Deal with it.

 
Old 05-15-2017, 04:12 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Sanders would have continued to explain out how he was going to pay for his ideas (which he always did) while Trump would have continued spending money and paying for them with tax cuts.

The saner candidate would have been clear.
 
Old 05-15-2017, 05:26 AM
 
Location: *
13,242 posts, read 4,919,031 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
No you can't. Had Sanders been the Democratic nominee, the GOP would have unleashed all kinds of attacks on him like they did on Hillary. I like SANDERS A LOT, but I also realize the the GOP attack machine largely left him alone because he wasn't the nominee (and was expected to be). Had he been the nominee suddenly the "He's a SOCIALIST" attacks would have started in earnest - and a LOT of very stupid Americans have an enormous fear of Socialism. Virtually ALL of those are the very same people who voted for Trump against Hillary.
Sanders MIGHT have won, but no one can say that for sure, because the GOP campaign would have been very different.

Ken
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Exactly.

Trump and the Republicans would have painted Sanders as an old socialist who was going to run up the national debt with all the giveaway programs.

Then there would have been all the slanderous attacks about him personally.

The notion that if Democrats had chosen Sanders as their candidate, then we wouldn't have ended up with with Trump is just nonsense.
Agree with these. I voted for Mr. Sanders in the NY primary however have long ago accepted the fact he did not succeed as Democratic candidate. I also accepted his explanation & the rationale given for standing with Ms. Clinton. He used rational persuasion to influence my vote for Ms. Clinton. Additionally, there were no lucid 3rd Party candidates offered. 3rd Party candidates did not rationally persuade or influence my vote, those offered were incoherent on significant issues, it wasn't that I was ensured they wouldn't succeed as viable candidates, it was that I didn't agree with their plans, or lack of plans. A pro-Labor candidate with a strategy for effectively dealing with the problems associated with the ever-increasing financialization of the US would've been a winner in my book even if they didn't 'win' the office.
 
Old 05-15-2017, 06:28 AM
 
Location: City Data Land
17,156 posts, read 12,949,556 times
Reputation: 33174
I want to know who Comey's replacement will be. Trump has had some trouble finding replacements for people he's fired before. Candidates hesitate to take on what is usually a peach of a job offer because they don't want to be at risk of getting fired due to Trump's impulsiveness.
 
Old 05-15-2017, 06:32 AM
 
Location: *
13,242 posts, read 4,919,031 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks View Post
I want to know who Comey's replacement will be. Trump has had some trouble finding replacements for people he's fired before. Candidates hesitate to take on what is usually a peach of a job offer because they don't want to be at risk of getting fired due to Trump's impulsiveness.
Potential employees find him to be just as untrustworthy & incompetent as do most American people.
 
Old 05-15-2017, 06:35 AM
 
51,651 posts, read 25,785,636 times
Reputation: 37884
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiGeekGuest View Post
Potential employees find him to be just as untrustworthy & incompetent as do most American people.
Anyone willing to take a job in this administration is betting that Trump is going to prevail.

That's starting to look like a losing bet.
 
Old 05-15-2017, 07:54 AM
 
8,061 posts, read 4,882,380 times
Reputation: 2460
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiGeekGuest View Post
Re: bold: how about tamping down on the drama & calling it for what it is ~ the Trump administration desires to avoid scrutiny by preventing transparency.



Re: bold: (Stating the obvious) The 'speed' of the process is less concerning than the legitimacy.
It is clear that some of the left do not get it or they acknowledge they have broken laws for political gain! The Administration and the Obama political appointees have worked to preserve power and continuation of the Obama policies.


Comey should of been gone by any standard of good Police work. He had compromised the FBI and the left hated him. The GOP quested the fact HRC was in violation of USC 18 and the sub violations.


Based on standard Comey should of been called. Obstruction of justice?


Lynch hand ample room for a indictment (HRC)which Comey laid out. The problem for Demarcates could of resulted in the Impeachment for Obama and the senior leadership of the party.
Now we looking at criminal charges for all of the mentioned Leadership.
Pedesta
Obama
Bill and Hil
Sharon Millis
Huma
Shultz and Brazil
Plus the Hundreds of Obama insiders that were complicit knowingly or not, that carried out the orders from the Senior Leadership of the socialist Dem. Party!
 
Old 05-15-2017, 08:11 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,319,675 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
She had already lost. People in Detroit and Philly didn't vote for her over things Obama had done.
Nope. Clinton beat Trump in Detroit 95% to 3%.

'...Donald Trump carried Michigan by 10,704 votes, or 47.5% to 47.3%, according to the final results submitted to the Michigan Secretary of State. But in Detroit, Democrat Hillary Clinton trounced Trump, winning 95% of the vote to his 3%....

Detroit's election woes: 782 more votes than voters

Clinton took Philidelphia 82.$% to Trumps 15.5%

Pennsylvania Election Results 2016: President Live Map by County, Real-Time Voting Updates - POLITICO

Trumps win in those 2 states was very thin - especially in Michigan where just over 10,000 votes (out of 2.2 million who voted) made the difference.

Ken
 
Old 05-15-2017, 08:24 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,319,675 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by GHOSTRIDER AZ View Post
It is clear that some of the left do not get it or they acknowledge they have broken laws for political gain! The Administration and the Obama political appointees have worked to preserve power and continuation of the Obama policies.


Comey should of been gone by any standard of good Police work. He had compromised the FBI and the left hated him. The GOP quested the fact HRC was in violation of USC 18 and the sub violations.
//www.city-data.com/forum/editp...ost&p=48160181

Based on standard Comey should of been called. Obstruction of justice?


Lynch hand ample room for a indictment (HRC)which Comey laid out. The problem for Demarcates could of resulted in the Impeachment for Obama and the senior leadership of the party.
Now we looking at criminal charges for all of the mentioned Leadership.
Pedesta
Obama
Bill and Hil
Sharon Millis
Huma
Shultz and Brazil
Plus the Hundreds of Obama insiders that were complicit knowingly or not, that carried out the orders from the Senior Leadership of the socialist Dem. Party!
Um yeah, because Republican Comey had "such a love" for the Democrats and Hillary Clinton.


It always cracks me up when City-Data "legal scholars" bloviate with their "profound" knowledge of the law.
Give me a break.
WHERE is your law degree from again?


If the case against Clinton is "so strong" what's stopping Trump and his AG from pressing charges NOW? After all, HE SAID HE WOULD DO SO. Was Trump just LYING to you all along? Gee, imagine that.


Ken
 
Old 05-15-2017, 10:02 AM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
5,649 posts, read 5,958,672 times
Reputation: 8317
Quote:
Originally Posted by sd-bound View Post
How Nixonian can you get?
Funny how all the leftists were calling for Comey's head during the election, with many Democrat leaders saying Obama should axe him, but as soon as Trump actually does it, you're all calling for his head.


Oh, the hypocrites! Makes me laugh.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top