Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-15-2017, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ottomobeale View Post
And a small enough government is called Somalia, try it.
Somalia has a very tyrannical ruling class that stomps on freedom. Educate yourself before commenting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ottomobeale View Post
In neither of my jobs do I make anything close to minimum wage. Simply I do know people near this level. I know how crappy their lives are. I sympathize with them since they are at least trying to make their own way unlike professional couch potatoes.
It's not about your wages. It's about you stealing money from a private business in order to pay someone what YOU think is the correct wage for that job. It's not your call and it never should be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-15-2017, 02:23 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,481,067 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
Lower wages = more jobs
This isn't true. Companies only hire when there is work that they need someone to do. They aren't going to hire extra people because the wages are lower. What are they going to do, have some people standing around idle and say "That's ok, we are paying them lower so we just hired more of them, although we still have the same amount of work we had before."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2017, 02:26 PM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,960,223 times
Reputation: 9226
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
This isn't true. Companies only hire when there is work that they need someone to do. They aren't going to hire extra people because the wages are lower. What are they going to do, have some people standing around idle and say "That's ok, we are paying them lower so we just hired more of them, although we still have the same amount of work we had before."
100% correct. Also, what good are more jobs if the people who work them have to collect food stamps?

I do like the fact that the conservatives in this thread aren't pretending to care about the working man anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2017, 02:27 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,265 posts, read 47,023,439 times
Reputation: 34060
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2ohhh View Post
Yeah, because everyone born in this country automatically has the intellect and ability to get a better-paying job. Sheesh.

I always wonder what planet righties live on where even the lowest-IQ individual gets a great job earning enough to pay for housing and food, no matter where they live. It must be lovely.
Another Americans are stupid post. Just great.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2017, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371
"According to a new report from the United States General Accountability Office (GAO), the 19 percent decline in employment in the workforce that American Samoa has experienced since 2008 was in large part the result of imposing minimum hourly wages across various industries. The island’s primary industry is tuna fish canning, with major employers Chicken of the Sea closing and Starkist announcing huge layoffs. In 2008, the number of workers in the canneries was slightly more than 19,000 but has since fallen to 15,400.

Imagine the impact of this kind of job loss on an island with a total population of just over 67,000 people. At the same time, according to the GAO, the value of canned tuna fell from almost $600 million at the end of 2008 to $312 million by the beginning of 2010. What is even more astonishing is that, despite minimum wage laws, earning overall for American Samoans has fallen. “For the period from 2006 to 2009, average inflation-adjusted earnings fell by 11 percent. This resulted from a rise in average annual earnings of about 5 percent while local prices rose by about 18 percent,” the GAO report stated. Another federally mandated minimum wage increase is scheduled to go into effect for the cannery industry in September 2012, raising the minimum to $5.26 an hour."


https://acton.org/pub/commentary/201...american-samoa

Less tuna boats are coming to these places. And they weren't empty when they arrived. They brought goods to these places so now there is a lowered supply.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2017, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2ohhh View Post
No one on this thread but you. I noticed because I'm paying such close attention to this thread about minimum wage (and minimum wage only). You want to talk about giving people "everything they want"? Start a different thread.
Think much? Having a minimum wage is an EXAMPLE of government giving you everything you want. If you can't understand the context of a simple statement stay out of the discussion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2017, 02:34 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,481,067 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
"According to a new report from the United States General Accountability Office (GAO), the 19 percent decline in employment in the workforce that American Samoa has experienced since 2008 was in large part the result of imposing minimum hourly wages across various industries. The island’s primary industry is tuna fish canning, with major employers Chicken of the Sea closing and Starkist announcing huge layoffs. In 2008, the number of workers in the canneries was slightly more than 19,000 but has since fallen to 15,400.

Imagine the impact of this kind of job loss on an island with a total population of just over 67,000 people. At the same time, according to the GAO, the value of canned tuna fell from almost $600 million at the end of 2008 to $312 million by the beginning of 2010. What is even more astonishing is that, despite minimum wage laws, earning overall for American Samoans has fallen. “For the period from 2006 to 2009, average inflation-adjusted earnings fell by 11 percent. This resulted from a rise in average annual earnings of about 5 percent while local prices rose by about 18 percent,” the GAO report stated. Another federally mandated minimum wage increase is scheduled to go into effect for the cannery industry in September 2012, raising the minimum to $5.26 an hour."


https://acton.org/pub/commentary/201...american-samoa

Less tuna boats are coming to these places. And they weren't empty when they arrived. They brought goods to these places so now there is a lowered supply.
This article is comparing time periods just before/just after the big economomic downturn of 2009. There were massive layoffs everywhere and many companies closed their doors forever, including large corporations that were in business for many decades. Of course there were big differences between 2008 and 2010. 2008 was before the big recession and by 2010, the big recession had already occurred. Same thing with the 2006 to 2009 comparison. This was before/after recession comparison too.

Don't try to blame this on minimum wage when it was recession related.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2017, 02:43 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
This isn't true. Companies only hire when there is work that they need someone to do. They aren't going to hire extra people because the wages are lower. What are they going to do, have some people standing around idle and say "That's ok, we are paying them lower so we just hired more of them, although we still have the same amount of work we had before."
Quite a few companies hire based on budgets.
When you artificially raise wages quality suffers. There is less value. Generally speaking when wages rise, the product cost will rise. A quality product for a fair price is the balance between consumer and producer. When prices rise the consumer gets hurt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2017, 02:52 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
This article is comparing time periods just before/just after the big economomic downturn of 2009. There were massive layoffs everywhere and many companies closed their doors forever, including large corporations that were in business for many decades. Of course there were big differences between 2008 and 2010. 2008 was before the big recession and by 2010, the big recession had already occurred. Same thing with the 2006 to 2009 comparison. This was before/after recession comparison too.

Don't try to blame this on minimum wage when it was recession related.
Tuna companies left for one reason and one reason only, because it wasn't worth it to pay the higher wages. They told us that.
But we should believe you over them right?

"In 2007, the hourly minimum wage in American Samoa for fish canning and processing was $3.76 and the minimum wage for government employees was $3.41. Shipping had the highest minimum wage, at $4.59. Garment manufacturers got the lowest, at $3.18 an hour. A $7.25 wage is a substantial increase for most residents.

Chicken of the Sea will lay off 2,041 employees—12 percent of total employment, almost half of all cannery workers. And the 2,700 workers at StarKist, the other American Samoa tuna canning company and Chicken of the Sea’s rival, are probably concerned that their jobs are the next to go.

American Samoa’s loss is Georgia’s gain. Chicken of the Sea will move to Lyons, Georgia, (2007 population 4,480) employing 200 people in a new $20 million plant on a more capital-intensive production line."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2017, 02:56 PM
 
28,164 posts, read 25,298,921 times
Reputation: 16665
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take it away.
When are people going to learn?
OMG this is so ass backwards.

Why should corporations STEAL the WORK AND LABOR of the WORKING class without any type of regulations to reign them in?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:36 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top