Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The president controls classified info, so if he wants to give it away, it is technically no longer classified and is no longer a criminal matter; nor is it an impeachable matter.
Pretty simple.
And ALL presidents will do this. I'm sure Odumbo gave plenty to Iran.
Only if you buy into the idea that you can attack the source and not have to deal with the message.
I have zero problems with arguing for/against the substance of any news item.
If you have any credible factual basis to assert that the content of NPR changed after Obama was elected, I would love to see it.
In the absense of such a defense of your opinion, I will simply assume you do not, and file it where I always file unsupported opinion, allegations and ad hominem attacks. .
It was always pro-left leaning, but I do believe I saw a more pronounced liberal bent in NPR and the way they presented their news during that time.
The president controls classified info, so if he wants to give it away, it is technically no longer classified and is no longer a criminal matter; nor is it an impeachable matter.
Pretty simple.
And ALL presidents will do this. I'm sure Odumbo gave plenty to Iran.
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" is "pretty simple" too.
Oh & abuse of power is an impeachable matter. Particularly when coupled with blatantly violating the Constitution.
"December 19, 2008: President Bush approved a bailout plan and gave General Motors and Chrysler $13.4 billion in financing from TARP (Troubled Assets Relief Program) funds, as well as $4 billion to be "withdrawn later".
NOW, we are being honest about it!
Ahhh, those with short and selective memories crack me up. If you're so confused about exactly what I meant look up what Obama did with respect to GM,Bondholders and the UAW...
Only if you buy into the idea that you can attack the source and not have to deal with the message.
I have zero problems with arguing for/against the substance of any news item.
If you have any credible factual basis to assert that the content of NPR changed after Obama was elected, I would love to see it.
In the absense of such a defense of your opinion, I will simply assume you do not, and file it where I always file unsupported opinion, allegations and ad hominem attacks. .
Ahhh, those with short and selective memories crack me up. If you're so confused about exactly what I meant look up what Obama did with respect to GM,Bondholders and the UAW...
I have a selective memory because you cannot be bothered to state your position clearly and concisely?
When you flesh out your opinion in actual words I'll be happy to respond.
Assume I have my position already prepared, in case you can cobble together something akin to a position.
Here is a thought, don't drive your business into the ground, beg for a handout and expect to dictate the terms.
Trump assured everyone that he never said, "Israel." Never said it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
