Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-23-2017, 11:22 AM
 
5,004 posts, read 15,346,950 times
Reputation: 2505

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
I'm thinking that the reason Trump installed such despicable and unsuitable people (with a couple of exceptions) in his cabinet and in other appointed positions, is so he could pull their strings and try to get them to violate the public trust, to serve his own interests.
That was obvious from the start, but of course he also wanted to ruin our country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-23-2017, 11:24 AM
 
51,651 posts, read 25,785,636 times
Reputation: 37884
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
The collusion allegation is what's being investigated. Obstruction may also end up being investigated. Even if collusion didn't happen, there seems to be some evidence that obstruction did. Which wouldn't be just unethical or criminal, but would also be supremely stupid if collusion actually didn't happen. No matter how irritating the Trump administration finds the investigation, they should have tried to restrain themselves.
Risking obstruction of justice charges when you're innocent is a moron's move.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2017, 11:28 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Risking obstruction of justice charges when you're innocent is a moron's move.
It certainly was when Clinton ended up being impeached, for perjury and obstruction of justice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2017, 11:33 AM
 
13,899 posts, read 6,439,195 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Risking obstruction of justice charges when you're innocent is a moron's move.
There was no obstruction. Comey testified UNDER OATH that it didn't happen. Case closed, move on to the next lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2017, 11:37 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
There was no obstruction. Comey testified UNDER OATH that it didn't happen. Case closed, move on to the next lie.
The case is hardly closed. We'll have to see what comes out of the investigation. Which could take years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2017, 11:39 AM
 
4,279 posts, read 1,902,602 times
Reputation: 1266
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Um, empty blather.

If you can't rebut any of my arguments, then you resort to personal attacks.
I did, your argument was based on "consensus" and not evidence.

Your argument is invalid, you are shown for the political propaganda you promote.

Learn logic, or go back to school... oh wait... they don't teach logic in the public education system, only partisan politics!

run along!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2017, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,647 posts, read 26,363,905 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by ipaper View Post
Gowdy couldn't even crack Hillary Clinton in an 11 hour hearing, I doubt if he can do anything with Comey.


With the Obama DOJ onboard and a zero chance of charges being filed against her, she knew all she had to do was run out the clock.


That was then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2017, 11:44 AM
 
51,651 posts, read 25,785,636 times
Reputation: 37884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
There was no obstruction. Comey testified UNDER OATH that it didn't happen. Case closed, move on to the next lie.
Asking the directors in the IC to lay off Flynn is straight up obstruction of justice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2017, 11:44 AM
 
4,279 posts, read 1,902,602 times
Reputation: 1266
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
The case is hardly closed. We'll have to see what comes out of the investigation. Which could take years.
Ah, so nothing, no evidence.. but you hope and pray (oh wait, you hate God, oh.. but you do support Allah for your goals, so never mind) don't you? We know you do because you are as partisan as they come.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2017, 11:56 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by NxtGen View Post
I did, your argument was based on "consensus" and not evidence.

Your argument is invalid, you are shown for the political propaganda you promote.

Learn logic, or go back to school... oh wait... they don't teach logic in the public education system, only partisan politics!

run along!
MY argument was based on a consensus of statements made by intelligence officials. Which certainly rises to the level of evidence. My argument is not invalid. These statements were not political propaganda.

I give you back the same advice, learn logic or go back to school.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top