Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
1.) Obstruction of Justice in the firing of Sally Yates.
2.) Obstruction of Justice in the firing of Preet Bharara.
3.) Obstruction of Justice in the firing of James Comey.
Is Trump the only President not allowed to fire hires from previous administrations?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
4.) Racketeering and Corruption under Federal RICO law. (This one is a big one and kinda tricky. When Flynn, Stone, Page, Guiliani, and Manafort go down on RICO charges, the entire lot of them go down. That means Trump, Ivanka, Jared, Pence, Sessions, Rosenstein, Conway, Spicer, Preibus and Bannon. Because in RICO, if you indict one part of the conspiracy, the remaining parties in the closed loop are charged as well. Trump himself is especially vulnerable if AG Schniederman charges him with state RICO charges.)
Ever read 18 U.S.C. Section 1961 et. seq., the Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization Act? If the Trump Administration are racketeers, what about Whitewater and Travelgate? Or Benghazi or the abuse of the IRS?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
5.) Treason
Read Article III Section 3 U.S. Constitution.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
6.) Collusion and conspiring against the United States with a foreign power.
Not sure what you're talking about. What about Obama's subterranean negotiations with Hamas, Fatah and Iran?
[quote=cuebald;48237225] 7.) Violation of the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution.[/qutoe]Which foreign gifts to who?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
8.) Violation of Federal Witness Intimidation laws
Details? Sounds conclusory to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
9.) Violation of anti-Nepotism laws for hiring his daughter and son-in-law as federal employees.
He actually kept within the laws.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
10.) Disclosure of classified information
Obama loosened those regulations on the eve of his departure in order to sully the reputations of Trump advisors and appointees.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
11.) Self-dealing while occupying a federal office (advertising his businesses and those of his wife and daughter on federal websites and property.
Ivanka and her business advisors may have a problem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
12.) Abuse of power
What statute?
I insist on specifics, not conclusions based on the title of a group of laws or newspaper headlines.
Whatever you're drinking, send a bottle down I-85.
Haven't had a drink in over 30 years. I pay attention to the news and steer clear of FOX, CNN, and MSNBC.
Reuters, the Guardian, BBC, AP, and Al Jazeera are my main go-tos. Amazing what you learn when you read news reported by outlets who don't have a dog in the fight.
[quote=jbgusa;48237299]Is Trump the only President not allowed to fire hires from previous administrations?
Not when they are investigating him. Nixon tried it and that stated the snowball rolling down the hill for him.
Ever read 18 U.S.C. Section 1961 et. seq., the Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization Act? If the Trump Administration are racketeers, what about Whitewater and Travelgate? Or Benghazi or the abuse of the IRS? Remember the raid the FBI pulled in Maryland last week? The GOP fundraising concern? They were looking for evidence of money laundering. Rumor (only a rumor at this time) that 28 top repubs are subjects of interest including Trump, Pence, Ryan, and McConnell. You may see Orrin Hatch sworn in in a few months.
Read Article III Section 3 U.S. Constitution.
Not sure what you're talking about. What about Obama's subterranean negotiations with Hamas, Fatah and Iran?
Obama was not conspiring with a foreign government to throw an American election. The investgation will determine whether or not there was collusion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
7.) Violation of the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution.[/qutoe]Which foreign gifts to who? Offices and apartments sold to foreign agents in Trump Tower at three times the going rate. Ongoing profits being received by Trump when he schedules meetings and foreign governments foot the bills to stay in his properties.
Details? Sounds conclusory to me. His tweet threatening Comey about possible recordings is called "witness tampering" Google it.
He actually kept within the laws.
We shall see if it goes to litigaton.
Obama loosened those regulations on the eve of his departure in order to sully the reputations of Trump advisors and appointees.
So, then - Obama knew that Trump would be a loose cannon and reveal classified information to the Russians? Maybe we should have kept him on for a third term.
Ivanka and her business advisors may have a problem.
What statute?
I insist on specifics, not conclusions based on the title of a group of laws or newspaper headlines.
Insist away. What sources are you using, out of curiosity? I'd love to become as smart as you think you are.
Is Trump the only President not allowed to fire hires from previous administrations?
Not when they are investigating him. Nixon tried it and that stated the snowball rolling down the hill for him.
Ever read 18 U.S.C. Section 1961 et. seq., the Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization Act? If the Trump Administration are racketeers, what about Whitewater and Travelgate? Or Benghazi or the abuse of the IRS? Remember the raid the FBI pulled in Maryland last week? The GOP fundraising concern? They were looking for evidence of money laundering. Rumor (only a rumor at this time) that 28 top repubs are subjects of interest including Trump, Pence, Ryan, and McConnell. You may see Orrin Hatch sworn in in a few months.
Read Article III Section 3 U.S. Constitution.
Not sure what you're talking about. What about Obama's subterranean negotiations with Hamas, Fatah and Iran?
Obama was not conspiring with a foreign government to throw an American election. That's what the investgation will determine.
Insist away. What sources are you using, out of curiosity? I'd love to become as smart as you think you are.
No, Obama didn't conspire with another nation to become president. He used the IRS to hamper all those conservative groups who supported the Republican Candidate for the Presidency. Obama did commit collusion with the IRS , tampering with the presidential election.
Obama also in this election told illegal aliens to vote for Hillary. It is recorded and on youtube.
No, Obama didn't conspire with another nation to become president. He used the IRS to hamper all those conservative groups who supported the Republican Candidate for the Presidency. Obama did commit collusion with the IRS , tampering with the presidential election.
Obama also in this election told illegal aliens to vote for Hillary. It is recorded and on youtube.
Great points. I repped the post. These facts seem to have escaped Schumer.
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
No, Obama didn't conspire with another nation to become president. He used the IRS to hamper all those conservative groups who supported the Republican Candidate for the Presidency. Obama did commit collusion with the IRS , tampering with the presidential election.
Obama also in this election told illegal aliens to vote for Hillary. It is recorded and on youtube.
[quote=jbgusa;48237507]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova
Great points. I repped the post. These facts seem to have escaped Schumer.
Haven't had a drink in over 30 years. I pay attention to the news and steer clear of FOX, CNN, and MSNBC.
Reuters, the Guardian, BBC, AP, and Al Jazeera are my main go-tos. Amazing what you learn when you read news reported by outlets who don't have a dog in the fight.
Absolutely, but people are tune into the networks that tell them what they want to hear. That network is the gospel truth to their ears, if they say it is so, then that's 100% how it is. This pretty goes both ways for both sides. I'm like you, I try to get most of my info from various sources.
I talk to Trump voters that I know and they are getting fired up and angry. They see the democrats trying daily to take Trump out and invalidate their votes for Trump.
If Trump was ever impeached there would be hell to pay.
Trump won when WE THE PEOPLE went to the ballot box and cast each vote
The liberals better think long and hard on what they are trying to do. Take down Trump. His supporters will rise up with such fervor there will be a rising up like never before. From what I heard ,it will be a war on government to think Trump supporters will lay down and take it.
Trump represents their hope for they have had none and no one will take it away without a fight. They have been forgotten for too long and their hope runs deep for a better America and a better life for them and their families.
It will be the Republicans that remove trump in the end, so your thinly veiled threat is built upon a house of sand.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
