Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
...
I also suspect that they know that if Trump gains his balance Hillary and perhaps Obama will wind up on the wrong side of investigations, for actual crimes.
We've had Presidents who I thought were fools and incompetents, even corrupt to some degree, but, before Donald Trump, we've never had a President who I suspected was treasonous.
I've thought Presidents were corporate shills, but this is the first time I've ever thought one was shilling for Russian oligarchs.
Can you give detailed example including the Oligarch in question?
Read the links already provided. Names are mentioned. E.g., we know the Russian bankers that Kushner met with after Trump's election victory.
Hopefully, Mueller and Congressional committee will discover exactly who financed Trump real estate developments during the Great Recession. Why do you ignore the Russian financing claims of Trump's sons? Finding such answers is exactly why there are independent investigations.
Last month, Democratic Senator Ed Markey delivered what seemed like an explosive bit of news during an interview with CNN: A grand jury had been impaneled in New York, he said, to investigate the Trump campaign’s alleged collusion with Russia.
The only problem: It wasn’t true.
The precise origins of the rumor are difficult to pin down, but it had been ricocheting around social media for days before Markey’s interview. The story had no reliable sourcing, and not a single credible news outlet touched it—but it had been fervently championed by The Palmer Report, a liberal blog known for peddling conspiracy theories, and by anti-Trump Twitter crusaders like Louise Mensch. Soon enough, prominent people with blue checkmarks by their names were amplifying it with “Big if true”-type Tweets. And by May 11, the story had migrated from the bowels of the internet to the mouth of a United States senator.
The difference was that the Democrat loss of the 1972 election was no surprise. 2016 was a surprise and the Democrats are pretending they really won. Or somehow were entitled to win.
Shhhhhhh, ya have to wait before scaring the children with the end of the play, let it come as a surprise.[/quote]I'm no Trumpster but I'm not a hater either. Mueller is making himself an...
I repped the post since this hits the nail on the head. There is no comparison between attempts to cover up middle of the night activities, i.e. crimes, and attempts to find a crime to fit the...
The subject of the Mueller investigation is supposed to be Russian meddling in the election, not Russian meddling in a real estate empire. This kind of mission creep could bag the most virtuous of...
According to the same fake news, or what I call biased news sources, the premise was that they could use the machinery of a lawful investigation to "investigate" the opposition and out or unmask...
A burglary somehow isn't a crime? I never heard of that before. The obstruction was when the burglars were found in possession of about $10,000 in sequentially numbered $100 bills, which quickly...
Because in the real world of foreign policy Trump was left with a set of sanctions he might not have imposed, and lifting or modifying them is messy, especially in an atmosphere of his being accused...
The trouble on one of these issues, Russian sanctions, is that Obama put them into effect when they could not possibly affect Hillary's election, but would be in effect to handcuff the new Trump...
At some point he has to be allowed to discharge his duties. By your view he has no legitimacy to do literally anything. Every president since FDR has in some way engaged with the Soviet Union and...
Nixon had a 3 1/2 year period in office before the Watergate burglary. There was plenty of official crime, not just Watergate. There was targeting of enemies by the IRS. The Ellsberg psychiatrist..
Russian paratroopers could be occupying the White House and the Capitol and Trumpies would deny it.
and conspiracy freak democrats will believe there really are "Russian paratroopers occupying the White House," despite no evidence that they are
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRnative
Trumpies, fortunately unlike most of even the Republicans in Congress, don't care about Russian interference in our nation's elections, and even the hacking of election boards. And they don't care one bit about why Trump isn't concerned about these direct attacks on our democracy, and why Trump fired Comey for his investigation of Russian meddling and hacking.
In my book, when a foreign government attempts to undermine our democracy, it's much more serious than Watergate.
Trumpies who join Trump in stonewalling the actions of Russia's dictator are disgusting.
What I find disgusting, is liberal dems who create conspiracy theories, without a shred of proof to validate them.
The loney left thinks Trump is capable of some weird Russian-Trump conspiracy, and just like there are no "Russian paratroopers occupying the White House," there is no Russian-Trump collusion.
Now, go sip some hot green tea, and come back to reality.
Read the links already provided. Names are mentioned. E.g., we know the Russian bankers that Kushner met with after Trump's election victory.
Hopefully, Mueller and Congressional committee will discover exactly who financed Trump real estate developments during the Great Recession. Why do you ignore the Russian financing claims of Trump's sons? Finding such answers is exactly why there are independent investigations.
People who believed in this contrived Russia-Trump collusion crap used to be funny, but now, with it going on so long, and ZERO freaking proof, those same folks who still believe in this conspiracy, are just flat out creepy now.
This now beginning to compare to Watergate. The early repeated denials by Trump, Pence, and campaign/WH officials. The firing of those overseeing the investigation in an effort to impede it. The mounting evidence directly contradicting the denials. The growing indication of illegal activities by those close to Trump.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
