Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't recall any investigation under Clinton or Regan on those embassy incidents, Benghazi lasted longer than the 9/11 and Watergate hearings. Do you think it might have been political.
I don't recall any investigation under Clinton or Regan on those embassy incidents, Benghazi lasted longer than the 9/11 and Watergate hearings. Do you think it might have been political.
Even Republicans have admitted that this was a partisan effort to smear Clinton, not actually an attempt at figuring out how to prevent the next embassy attack.
Got to love Sanders and all the Republicans whining about how long this has gone on, when will it end... and it's only been a few months.
They did interfere. The bigoted lie that said it was crazy muslims rioting over a video when in fact they were going after the gun runners that supplied arms which killed their people.
It wasn't the State Department or the White House that connected the video to Benghazi; it was the CIA. We know this because it has been fully investigated, even parts of the Presidential Daily Brief have been included in the Gowdy investigation.
How did the 2 week period where the CIA was claiming the video was connected to Benghazi interfere with the Benghazi investigations? All the numerous investigations were done after the CIA concluded that their initial assessment about the video was wrong.
LOL.... oh yea.... 4 dead and 3 liars > than hundreds dead. Just pointing out the hypocrisy and the witch hunt of the Benghazi trial that a GOP controlled Congress couldn't do anything about after 7 investigations.
I don't recall any investigation under Clinton or Regan on those embassy incidents, Benghazi lasted longer than the 9/11 and Watergate hearings. Do you think it might have been political.
Ya think?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry
No they didn't
Stay out of other countries civil wars by arming one side. Gee that was hard to figure out
Got to love all the democrats who think they are on to something and how they are avoiding talking policy.
Sure they did. Remember Kevin McCarthy - the unfortunate Republican who has a bad habit of blurting out the truth?
"And let me give you one example. Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she's un-trustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened had we not fought and made that happen."
And how many will die under Trumps policies of occupation? Do you complain only when the repubs were doing the killing? If you voted for the past 4 war mongers in chief it couldn't have mattered too much to you that we are over there.
Bring the troops home and protect our borders like the Constitution says.
I complain about hypocrisy and witch hunts, Benghazi was both.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
