Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Do we ever get to be at a point where we can say "Hey, no more" or "Hey, this isn't cool" and stop with the partisan stuff of "But so and so did it in the past!"? Or are we forever doomed to dance this way just because so and so did or theoretically did it on the other team first?
Do we ever get to be in a point where we can say "Hey, no more" or "Hey, this isn't cool" and stop with the partisan stuff of "But so and so did it in the past!"? Or are we forever doomed to dance this way just because so and so did or theoretically did it on the other team did it first?
The courts said it is legal. This has nothing to do with what you are saying BUT, this goes back as it often does to a long standing argument of mine......you can NOT expect others to do what you refused to do.
There was a question asked. I found the answer. The courts ruled.
Now, as I said in my first post......if you want to argue their competency, that is something else.
The courts said it is legal. This has nothing to do with what you are saying BUT, this goes back as it often does to a long standing argument of mine......you can NOT expect others to do what you refused to do.
There was a question asked. I found the answer. The courts ruled.
Now, as I said in my first post......if you want to argue their competency, that is something else.
I am not necessarily arguing legality, perhaps more morality. More of a broad question as to partisanship itself, really, which is an annoyance of mine. Just all this deflection back and forth to "Hillary Did it!" "Bush did!" etc.
I am not necessarily arguing legality, perhaps more morality. More of a broad question as to partisanship itself, really, which is an annoyance of mine. Just all this deflection back and forth to "Hillary Did it!" "Bush did!" etc.
When one refuses to condemn something, they have little ground in condemning others. (For the record, I did condemn Hillary's involvement and taking the proceedings behind closed doors).
Neither in question here have the background to do what they are doing. They are doing what they are doing because we refused to hold politicians accountable in the past.
It's still happening. (yes a biased source but the clip is here).
When one refuses to condemn something, they have little ground in condemning others. (For the record, I did condemn Hillary's involvement and taking the proceedings behind closed doors).
Neither in question here have the background to do what they are doing. They are doing what they are doing because we refused to hold politicians accountable in the past.
It's still happening. (yes a biased source but the clip is here).
Nepotism: the practice among those with power or influence of favoring relatives or friends, especially by giving them jobs.
You cannot defend Trump doing this and be a supporter of our way of government in the USA.
Hillary ran in part on a ticket proclaiming Bill would be a sort of co-President running the economy.
Did you complain about that at the time?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
