Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-11-2017, 09:42 PM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,742,432 times
Reputation: 5007
Ask yourself, which candidate did the bankers fund/endorse in 2016 and then ask yourself, why?

Glass-Steagall: Wall Street is not happy with Donald Trump. The GOP candidate’s pledge to bring back Glass-Steagall is an unwelcome surprise for the financial services industry.
Glass-Steagall: Wall Street is not happy with Donald Trump

Clinton dismisses reinstating Glass-Steagall
Clinton dismisses reinstating Glass Steagall, knocks those focused on the issue - CNNPolitics.com

 
Old 06-11-2017, 09:45 PM
 
Location: sumter
12,963 posts, read 9,639,296 times
Reputation: 10427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
That's great. Doesn't matter if the things go to hell as long as 'left' is not happy.

That's partisanship on steroids.
Absolutely, but some comments just isn't worth responding to, and that was one of them.
 
Old 06-11-2017, 09:47 PM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,742,432 times
Reputation: 5007
Sanders backs reviving Glass-Steagall
Sanders backs reviving Glass-Steagall | TheHill

Elizabeth Warren calls for return of Glass-Steagall
Warren calls for return of Glass-Steagall | TheHill

Jill Stein: Break up the big banks. Reinstate Glass-Steagall.
https://twitter.com/drjillstein/stat...316417?lang=en
 
Old 06-11-2017, 09:47 PM
 
Location: sumter
12,963 posts, read 9,639,296 times
Reputation: 10427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
A good example of party before country.
Yes
 
Old 06-11-2017, 09:54 PM
 
56,989 posts, read 35,168,788 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by FKD19124 View Post
well lets not forget who caused the baking crisis of 2008 and tried to blame it on Bush.
Remember the "feel good" legislation that forced banks to make loans to people who could not afford them so

they could buy a home?
B.S.

The banks WANTED to make those loans and came up with endless products to help unqualified people get mortgages. The government didn't force them to do anything.

Down here in Arizona, the banks came up with a loan that allowed illegals to buy homes using their Matricula Consular...the Feds had NOTHING to do with that!
 
Old 06-11-2017, 10:02 PM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,742,432 times
Reputation: 5007
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
B.S.

The banks WANTED to make those loans and came up with endless products to help unqualified people get mortgages. The government didn't force them to do anything.

Down here in Arizona, the banks came up with a loan that allowed illegals to buy homes using their Matricula Consular...the Feds had NOTHING to do with that!
After the stock market crash of 1929, people tried to pull their money from the banks, only to find their savings were gone. The government created FDIC, tax payer insurance on customer deposits to reestablish trust in the banks & the Glass Steagall Act, which made sure customer deposits were insured, but not risky banking investments. When Bill Clinton repealed the Glass-Steagall Act it opened the flood gates for banks to gamble with house money (i.e. our taxes) & get heavily into derivative markets, high risk mortgage bundles, etc. because it was a no-lose proposition for them. When things were going good, they money hand over fist. When it went **** up, the tax payers had to bail them out. Re-enactiong Glass-Steagall would fix that & force banks to gamble with their own money.
 
Old 06-11-2017, 10:13 PM
 
56,989 posts, read 35,168,788 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason3000 View Post
After the stock market crash of 1929, people tried to pull their money from the banks, only to find their savings were gone. The government created FDIC, tax payer insurance on customer deposits to reestablish trust in the banks & the Glass Steagall Act, which made sure customer deposits were insured, but not risky banking investments. When Bill Clinton repealed the Glass-Steagall Act it opened the flood gates for banks to gamble with house money (i.e. our taxes) & get heavily into derivative markets, high risk mortgage bundles, etc. because it was a no-lose proposition for them. When things were going good, they money hand over fist. When it went **** up, the tax payers had to bail them out. Re-enactiong Glass-Steagall would fix that & force banks to gamble with their own money.
Correct.

People who love taking the side of the oligarchs are talking a load of nonsense when they try to make us believe that banks were forced by the Feds to make loans to financially shaky people. The banks knew exactly what they were doing. In fact, if anything, they lobbied the Feds to take the shackles off even more. They thought that it would last forever.

Of course, AFTER it all tanked, they got their conservative allies to put the blame on things like the Community Reinvestment Act (blame the black and brown people again). Total B.S. The banks were making money hand over fist. And the Feds never have to force the banks to come up with ideas to make money no matter how questionable it is.
 
Old 06-12-2017, 06:14 AM
 
58,936 posts, read 27,247,795 times
Reputation: 14250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Don't they ever learn?

Stand by for new bail-out boom.

House Passes Bill that Would Roll Back Consumer Financial Protections - Consumer Reports

The bill’s backers also say financial institutions would have more opportunity to create new financial services that could benefit consumers, businesses and the economy.

Opponents of the bill say it could again usher in the days of expensive bank bailouts and leave consumers with few safeguards.
"Here’s what you need to know about how it would change regulations."

NOT here is what is actually in it.

I find the article very biased and I'd bet other publications will tell a DIFFERENT story.
 
Old 06-12-2017, 06:17 AM
 
58,936 posts, read 27,247,795 times
Reputation: 14250
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimChi2PG View Post
This is Bannon. He was reported to have said, "I’m a Leninist. Lenin wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal, too. I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of today’s establishment."

It's already been proven the banks cannot police themselves. While I know the Pubs will do anything to benefit their big money donors, it would be suicide to repeat what happened before. It's just too soon.

Bannon hasn't spoken well of Paul Ryan but there are Republicans who have shown they may be strongly in support of bringing everything down. I've heard a few of them say on camera, "I am willing to burn the house down" to get their way.

And since Trump hangs on every word Bannon says, Trump would have no problem signing the bill if it gets to him.

" He was reported to have said,"

Reminds me of "unnamed sources".

Come back when you have REAL stuff.
 
Old 06-12-2017, 06:24 AM
 
7,185 posts, read 3,696,028 times
Reputation: 3174
Quote:
Originally Posted by FKD19124
well lets not forget who caused the baking crisis of 2008 and tried to blame it on Bush.
Remember the "feel good" legislation that forced banks to make loans to people who could not afford them so

they could buy a home?


Yes, I remember Bush & GOP crammed through 40 initiatives to make sure low income people can get a loan. Thanks for reminding me. Feel good indeed. Or maybe "get re-elected" legislation is a better term.

Quote:
Bush's mission to get 5.5 million low income minorities mortgages when they would not otherwise qualify for them.

- Mobilizing the Private Sector: America's Homeownership Challenge

- Establish a national goal of at least 5.5 million new minority homeowners before the end of the decade.

- Challenge the private sector real estate and mortgage finance industries to dramatically increase their efforts to reduce the barriers to homeownership faced by minority families and to work with the nonprofit sector in a concerted effort to achieve this goal through national and local partnerships.

- Convene a White House Conference on Increasing Minority Homeownership, to highlight the homeownership barriers faced by minorities and develop proposed solutions.

- A substantial increase of at least $440 billion in the financial commitment made by the government-sponsored enterprises involved in the secondary mortgage market, specifically targeted toward the minority market;

- Twenty-five different local initiatives to be undertaken across the nation, geared toward eliminating the specific homeownership barriers faced by minority families in those communities;

- A commitment to raise $750 million in below-market-rate investments by 2007, which will work in collaboration with local homeownership initiatives and be targeted to heavily minority program areas;

- Pursuing strategic partnerships in 20 top housing markets between homebuilders, lenders, local officials, and community leaders to develop approaches that address the local challenges to building homes for minority families living in urban centers;

- Establishing of faith-based housing partnerships between the participants and at least 100 churches, mosques, synagogues, and other faith-based institutions;

- Aggressively developing new mortgage products so that conventional market alternatives are available to combat the predatory loan products that are disproportionately targeted to minorities;

- Creating new mortgage products to meet the unique needs of recent immigrants;

- Dramatically expanding financial education efforts for minorities, providing financial counseling to at least 380,000 minority families, and taking measures at the local level to reduce predatory lending; and

- Establishing multilingual, consumer-oriented internet Web sites designed to help minorities overcome barriers to homeownership, including creation of a central data bank of affordable housing programs made available to real estate agents when working with clients.

----

Yeah, that whole thing about someone "trying to blame the banking crisis on bush"... wonder who the OP thought was really to blame?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:05 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top