Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-11-2017, 04:13 PM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,737,662 times
Reputation: 21097

Advertisements

Joe Biden told DNC donors that he knew Hillary was going to lose as early as late September.

Said that she was going to lose all the battleground states and that she wasn't the right candidate.

How can this be? Obama & Hillary said that she lost because of Russians. Both can't be True.

Biden: I knew Hillary would lose the election | New York Post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-11-2017, 04:15 PM
 
34,153 posts, read 17,225,555 times
Reputation: 17255
I knew, too.

Rust Belt sent a statement when Sanders upset 21 point fav HRC in Michigan primary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2017, 04:21 PM
 
32,029 posts, read 27,221,906 times
Reputation: 24958
Biden should have done what all sensible vice-presidents in past have; run for POTUS.


Obama may not have been the most popular POTUS in some quarters, but Joe Biden would have blown HC out of the water, and energized enough democratic voters to turn out that may have swung the election.


The whole DNC anointing of the Clinton Woman as the "only" choice for 2016, then using sharp elbows to clear the field is one large part of why DT is POTUS.


Sadly wiser heads in the DNC along with rank and file democrats *knew* just how much the electorate at large detested or at least didn't trust HC much less he Clintons in general. They simply were counting on how Obama won in 2012 striking lightening twice; that is the GOP nominating such a repulsive candidate that the democrat would win largely by default. Well things didn't work out that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2017, 04:23 PM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,737,662 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960 View Post
I knew, too.

Rust Belt sent a statement when Sanders upset 21 point fav HRC in Michigan primary.

Yeah. They don't like Hillary Clinton in Michigan.

Obama's anti-worker policies turned Michigan into a Red state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2017, 04:24 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,382,127 times
Reputation: 10644
This is fakenews from Politico. Politico is the only one reporting this, and as usual, cite "unnamed sources". And Biden denies the comments.

Anyone else notice that the only people obsessed with the election are the Trump cultists? Anything to draw attention away from the disaster in the White House. Everyone else has moved on, and is concentrating on ending our present national nightmare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2017, 04:33 PM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,737,662 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
This is fakenews from Politico. Politico is the only one reporting this, and as usual, cite "unnamed sources". And Biden denies the comments.

Anyone else notice that the only people obsessed with the election are the Trump cultists? Anything to draw attention away from the disaster in the White House. Everyone else has moved on, and is concentrating on ending our present national nightmare.
How do you know it's fake?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2017, 05:01 PM
 
21,427 posts, read 7,495,075 times
Reputation: 13233
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Obama & Hillary said that she lost because of Russians. Both can't be True.
You are promoting a false narrative.

#1 - The Russian meddling was seen as a serious national security issue regardless of whether they preferred any one candidate over another. They could do it for any reason, without having a preference. Because of this the involvement of the Russians must be studied and procedures put in place to protect the integrity of elections -local and/or national- going forward.

#2 - IF the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian hackers to try and gain an advantage, in other words a quid pro quo, it would be a crime whether or not Mr Trump won and we would still be seeing an investigation. This is a separate issue from #1.

In other words, if Joe Biden, or Ted Cruz, or Hillary Clinton or Marco Rubio (or anyone else, including Trump) was president right now we would still need to investigate the Trump campaign because of the contacts that have shown up. It doesn't matter that Trump won the election or that Clinton lost, the possible crime needs to be investigated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2017, 05:17 PM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,737,662 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
You are promoting a false narrative.

#1 - The Russian meddling was seen as a serious national security issue regardless of whether they preferred any one candidate over another. They could do it for any reason, without having a preference. Because of this the involvement of the Russians must be studied and procedures put in place to protect the integrity of elections -local and/or national- going forward.

#2 - IF the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian hackers to try and gain an advantage, in other words a quid pro quo, it would be a crime whether or not Mr Trump won and we would still be seeing an investigation. This is a separate issue from #1.

In other words, if Joe Biden, or Ted Cruz, or Hillary Clinton or Marco Rubio (or anyone else, including Trump) was president right now we would still need to investigate the Trump campaign because of the contacts that have shown up. It doesn't matter that Trump won the election or that Clinton lost, the possible crime needs to be investigated.
No false narrative.

#1 Russian hacking happened under Obama's watch. They knew it was going on Why did he allow it?

#2 Trump did not collude with Russian hackers. So irrelevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2017, 05:37 PM
 
21,427 posts, read 7,495,075 times
Reputation: 13233
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
No false narrative.

#1 Russian hacking happened under Obama's watch. They knew it was going on Why did he allow it?
Everything known was after the fact. They didn't watch the hacking into state voter databases, as in most cases the states discovered the breaches, then investigated them to try and find out the perpetrators.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
#2 Trump did not collude with Russian hackers. So irrelevant.
Whether Mr Trump personally colluded or not, there were multiple contacts between the campaign and the Russian government. These were discovered incidentally, while monitoring the Russians.

No other campaign had this. There were 16 other Republican campaigns, five Democratic campaigns, the Johnson campaign and the Stein campaign. None of the others had any contacts with the Russian government ... none of them.

The Trump campaign had multiple contacts at many levels over several months. Quite a coincidence.

It should be noted that up to this point it has been the campaign being investigated, not the man. If the man turns out to have tried to interfere or cover up the investigation into his campaign, that would be a separate crime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2017, 05:48 PM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,981,963 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
Everything known was after the fact. They didn't watch the hacking into state voter databases, as in most cases the states discovered the breaches, then investigated them to try and find out the perpetrators.
Whether Mr Trump personally colluded or not, there were multiple contacts between the campaign and the Russian government. These were discovered incidentally, while monitoring the Russians.

No other campaign had this. There were 16 other Republican campaigns, five Democratic campaigns, the Johnson campaign and the Stein campaign. None of the others had any contacts with the Russian government ... none of them.

The Trump campaign had multiple contacts at many levels over several months. Quite a coincidence.

It should be noted that up to this point it has been the campaign being investigated, not the man. If the man turns out to have tried to interfere or cover up the investigation into his campaign, that would be a separate crime.
Did you believe a YouTube video caused a preplanned terrorist attack, too?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top